Exclusive satellite images accessed by ThePrint show that the Chinese has deployed 2,000 troops near Doklam. We bring perspectives if the Doklam issue has resolved or can flare up again.
Ahead of his visit to New Delhi, US Secretary of State reveals the Indo-US relationship will be tough on China, firm on terrorism, and open for business.
Niti Aayog Vice Chairman Rajiv Kumar's comments made news on a range of hot button issues – from the slowdown to GST, unemployment to disinvestment in Air India.
Sitharaman, who is only the second woman defence minister in India's history, is expected to work closely with the Finance Minister to take key industry-related decisions
The Italian term sprezzatura—a studied nonchalance that conceals intention—best captures the spirit of Trump’s foreign policy so far. The pattern is unpredictability, transactionalism, and disruption as diplomacy.
With 20.2 percent of its total loans in default by the end of last year, Bangladesh had the weakest banking system in Asia. Despite reforms, it will take time to recover.
This world is being restructured and redrawn by one man, and what’s his power? It’s not his formidable military. It’s trade. With China, it turned on him.
All satellite imageries have the coordinates of the image. the absence of any such data in the imagery posted makes the thrudt of the story irrelevant since the imagery could be anywhere- at a PLA base well inside China, in the area inside the disputed Bhutan-China territory, near the Bhutan boundary but in the Chinese side of the disputed terriroty etc. Inshort in the absence of such hard info on the geographic coordinates of the imagery makes the stroy irrelevant. It could be anywhere- one could as well show an imagery of the Indian troops anywhere in Sikkim and claim that Indian troops are amassing the Doklam area.
Either such coordinates data was available and ThePrint chose not to show it, in which case somke justification for such an omission is in order or The Print does not have any such coordiante information which indicates a lack of professionalism on the part of whoever wrote the story
All satellite imageries have the coordinates of the image. the absence of any such data in the imagery posted makes the thrudt of the story irrelevant since the imagery could be anywhere- at a PLA base well inside China, in the area inside the disputed Bhutan-China territory, near the Bhutan boundary but in the Chinese side of the disputed terriroty etc. Inshort in the absence of such hard info on the geographic coordinates of the imagery makes the stroy irrelevant. It could be anywhere- one could as well show an imagery of the Indian troops anywhere in Sikkim and claim that Indian troops are amassing the Doklam area.
Either such coordinates data was available and ThePrint chose not to show it, in which case somke justification for such an omission is in order or The Print does not have any such coordiante information which indicates a lack of professionalism on the part of whoever wrote the story