Past court judgments have been unable to clarify whether women's right under Domestic Violence Act takes precedence over the right of parents-in-law under the Senior Citizens Act.
Researchers from Boston and Delhi universities surveyed young married Indian women aged between 18-30 in Uttar Pradesh’s Jaunpur district. This is what they found.
Assam CM can’t celebrate that the Congress drew a blank in the Bodoland Territorial Council polls in 2010 as well as 2015, and bagged only one in 2020.
SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
In post on social media, Cooper narrated experience of MiG-21 researcher from Germany who wanted to attend aircraft’s farewell ceremony in India, and the roadblocks he faced.
What Munir has achieved with Trump is a return to normal, ironing out the post-Abbottabad crease. The White House picture gives us insight into how Pakistan survives, occasionally thrives and thinks.
A feminist approach to write a biased article by hiding real picture of daughter in law….the print is totally a feminist plateform. They care only for daughter in law for their rights without responsibility. It is breaking family system in india…
Batra vs batra judgment is landmark judgment in history of india and very good too
What a biased article. Daughter in laws all over India are misusing right to residence of DV act by faking allegations of Domestic violence against husband and his family. This causes tremendous mental and financial harrasment of the family. Senior citizens were at least made safe from this and now your biased article wants to take their right away? Have some shame, stop selling out of Feminist lobby.
What if a wife is colluding with her parent? The family breaking foreign agenda to weaken the state of India is the only thing you wish to achieve. Instead of staying together in a hostile home with abusive people, why shouldn’t you think of milking the maintenance for rental?
The complete interpretation needs an overhaul.
1. The women today are educated. The country spends money on their education. They become dependent on others for life does not make any sense.
2. Parent-in-laws have completed their responsibility. They should be kept sway from husband wife dispute.
3. Parents-in-laws do not have any income. Our country has no social security system. Old people have to manage their own living and healthcare. They can’t be held responsible for someone else’s dispute.
4. There is a blatant misuse of dv act by today’s women.
Very good explanation given by Manish ji. Courts give interim relief to daughter in law on mere allegations of domestic violence, then what is remedy left for inlaws to vacate their home .
Its not contrary to each other.lawyers including judges forget this fact that dv act can be applied only if domestic violence has been committed upon the daughter in law and not othrws. Courts in a routine nanner grant interim relief which is unlawful.
Senior citizen act is applied when the daughter in law treats them with cruelty.
Further, even a mother in kaw can invoke dv act against daughter in law for domestic violence commited by daughter in law and can take relief to throw out daughter in law from the residence.
So whenever there is no domestic violence on daughter in law, or the allegations are false, she is not entitled to any relief under the DV act.
A feminist approach to write a biased article by hiding real picture of daughter in law….the print is totally a feminist plateform. They care only for daughter in law for their rights without responsibility. It is breaking family system in india…
Batra vs batra judgment is landmark judgment in history of india and very good too
What a biased article. Daughter in laws all over India are misusing right to residence of DV act by faking allegations of Domestic violence against husband and his family. This causes tremendous mental and financial harrasment of the family. Senior citizens were at least made safe from this and now your biased article wants to take their right away? Have some shame, stop selling out of Feminist lobby.
What if a wife is colluding with her parent? The family breaking foreign agenda to weaken the state of India is the only thing you wish to achieve. Instead of staying together in a hostile home with abusive people, why shouldn’t you think of milking the maintenance for rental?
The complete interpretation needs an overhaul.
1. The women today are educated. The country spends money on their education. They become dependent on others for life does not make any sense.
2. Parent-in-laws have completed their responsibility. They should be kept sway from husband wife dispute.
3. Parents-in-laws do not have any income. Our country has no social security system. Old people have to manage their own living and healthcare. They can’t be held responsible for someone else’s dispute.
4. There is a blatant misuse of dv act by today’s women.
Very good explanation given by Manish ji. Courts give interim relief to daughter in law on mere allegations of domestic violence, then what is remedy left for inlaws to vacate their home .
Its not contrary to each other.lawyers including judges forget this fact that dv act can be applied only if domestic violence has been committed upon the daughter in law and not othrws. Courts in a routine nanner grant interim relief which is unlawful.
Senior citizen act is applied when the daughter in law treats them with cruelty.
Further, even a mother in kaw can invoke dv act against daughter in law for domestic violence commited by daughter in law and can take relief to throw out daughter in law from the residence.
So whenever there is no domestic violence on daughter in law, or the allegations are false, she is not entitled to any relief under the DV act.