Dalit couple Shiv Shankar Das and Kshipra Kamlesh Uke secure landmark compensation for intellectual property loss under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
I joined JNU’s Centre for Historical Studies in 1995, and found that books and archival materials on Dalits and Adivasis were scarce. Keeping up the Brahminical caste status was a primary motive of these studies.
Allies and partners are now pushed not only to align strategically and spend more on their own security, but also to accept the economic and political terms of “America First.”
Number of states implementing unconditional cash transfers increased fivefold between FY23 and FY26, half of them estimated to be in revenue deficit, report says.
Mechanical engineer & alumnus of IIM-A & IAS France, Kota was General Manager in HAL’s Light Combat Aircraft division. He was selected from a pool of eight candidates.
No nation other than China can negotiate one-on-one with Trump on an equal footing. That’s why the middle powers who so far formed the core of multilateral bodies now feel orphaned.
In 2016, the landlord asked them to vacate the premises. Usually, either party can notify the other of moving out a month in advance. The couple sought “some time” to do so. It’s clear from the news report that even in 2018 (two years after they were asked to move out), they had not vacated the property and were in possession of the same. This is nothing but hooliganism. How can anyone put up with such tenants?
Henceforth, landlords will be extra careful when renting out their properties and may even ask for thorough background check to look for caste and education/political markers.
What about the genuine cases where a renter refuses to leave? What if the renter is SC ST? In India discriminating before renting is prevalent hecause eviction is hard. Renting is not the same as selling and renters deciding schools etc based on rental property is not fair to the landlord who can never sell. This will raise the discrimination and filtering by landlords.
In 2016, the landlord asked them to vacate the premises. Usually, either party can notify the other of moving out a month in advance. The couple sought “some time” to do so. It’s clear from the news report that even in 2018 (two years after they were asked to move out), they had not vacated the property and were in possession of the same. This is nothing but hooliganism. How can anyone put up with such tenants?
Henceforth, landlords will be extra careful when renting out their properties and may even ask for thorough background check to look for caste and education/political markers.
What about the genuine cases where a renter refuses to leave? What if the renter is SC ST? In India discriminating before renting is prevalent hecause eviction is hard. Renting is not the same as selling and renters deciding schools etc based on rental property is not fair to the landlord who can never sell. This will raise the discrimination and filtering by landlords.