Dalit couple Shiv Shankar Das and Kshipra Kamlesh Uke secure landmark compensation for intellectual property loss under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
I joined JNU’s Centre for Historical Studies in 1995, and found that books and archival materials on Dalits and Adivasis were scarce. Keeping up the Brahminical caste status was a primary motive of these studies.
On paper, the 21-point plan looks balanced—Palestinian governance, international oversight, reconstruction pledges. But in reality, it is a non-negotiable diktat.
As many as 21 policy reforms are under implementation following Invest Kerala Global Summit, as LDF govt works to change perception that the state is not conducive to businesses.
Amid continued concerns over cross-border terrorism, General Upendra Dwivedi further warned the neighbour that India will not show restraint if there is an Op Sindoor 2.0.
What Munir has achieved with Trump is a return to normal, ironing out the post-Abbottabad crease. The White House picture gives us insight into how Pakistan survives, occasionally thrives and thinks.
In 2016, the landlord asked them to vacate the premises. Usually, either party can notify the other of moving out a month in advance. The couple sought “some time” to do so. It’s clear from the news report that even in 2018 (two years after they were asked to move out), they had not vacated the property and were in possession of the same. This is nothing but hooliganism. How can anyone put up with such tenants?
Henceforth, landlords will be extra careful when renting out their properties and may even ask for thorough background check to look for caste and education/political markers.
What about the genuine cases where a renter refuses to leave? What if the renter is SC ST? In India discriminating before renting is prevalent hecause eviction is hard. Renting is not the same as selling and renters deciding schools etc based on rental property is not fair to the landlord who can never sell. This will raise the discrimination and filtering by landlords.
In 2016, the landlord asked them to vacate the premises. Usually, either party can notify the other of moving out a month in advance. The couple sought “some time” to do so. It’s clear from the news report that even in 2018 (two years after they were asked to move out), they had not vacated the property and were in possession of the same. This is nothing but hooliganism. How can anyone put up with such tenants?
Henceforth, landlords will be extra careful when renting out their properties and may even ask for thorough background check to look for caste and education/political markers.
What about the genuine cases where a renter refuses to leave? What if the renter is SC ST? In India discriminating before renting is prevalent hecause eviction is hard. Renting is not the same as selling and renters deciding schools etc based on rental property is not fair to the landlord who can never sell. This will raise the discrimination and filtering by landlords.