Instead wants to Centre to appoint him as Jharkhand CJ; collegium reiterates justice Joseph’s elevation.
New Delhi: Buckling under pressure from the Modi government, the...
Punjab & Haryana HC judge Ajay Kumar Mittal wrote to the Union law minister on 30 May saying some of the names don’t merit appointment as high court judges.
The collegium gives the impression that it has been certain of the need to appoint an eminent member of the Bar and that Joseph was the only other fit person.
It decided that his name “should also be accompanied by the recommendation of the names of chief justices of high courts for elevation” to the Supreme Court.
MoSPI proposes to remove closed factories from IIP sample, aiming for truer picture of India’s industrial health in upcoming 2022–23 base series. Plan open to public feedback until 25 November.
Bihar is blessed with a land more fertile for revolutions than any in India. Why has it fallen so far behind then? Constant obsession with politics is at the root of its destruction.
What ever happened in Rafael deal is very unworthy of the situation. Now whatever is said now is that, it could have been avoided had the purchases were approved and finalized during UPA’s regime. Nobody is questioning them as why it didn’t happen then? Why was nation’s security not prioritized?
Mr. Ram wants to hang an imaginary impropeity on the rafeal deal. But try as he might he finds not even an imaginary trail. So he freaks out that he can’t find one.
Ram in his own wisdom says there is no money trial in Rafeal deal.My dear Ram I say you erred on wrong side .In the name national security and purchase of arms ,nation can not be fooled by Rhetorics and dancing on the stage and dragging army and patriotism to play. This is an internal governmental agreement without sovereign guarantee. Everybody with some knowledge know the limitations of comfort letter.The agreement is in fly away condition so where is place for offset partner. Indian government do not have any MOU with Dassault as such India can not proceed against Dassault in case of any dispute whatsoever ever. How many Indians believe that Dassault has choosen Anil defence as offset partner without any indication from Mr Modi. Is it not true that then defence Minister parrikar said in the TV panel interview that he did not know about deal, Mr Modi put the deal the and I endorse it.Is it not true Anil group failed to pay Rs550/ crs to Ericson as committed in the supreme court and it is an offence where imprisonment is for 6 months.?Is it not true in IDBI case Anil group is facing bankruptcy under IBC2016. ? What is the financial status and jet manufacturing capacity of Anil group. Anil group purchased the land at Nagpur only after Dassault invested Rs245/ crs in Anil group. Pl do a fact check
N Ram’s logic is opaque. He considered the 2016 price with a scenario of what could have been the price with India-specific enhancements if the bid had been accepted in 2009-2012. This didn’t happen and is just a wishful thinking. If we think of options available in 2025-2016, the calculations would be as below: The total contracted price for 36 planes is 7.87 billion euros , i.e. 0.219 billion euros per plane. Now reduce 1.3 billion euros from the total cost of 7.87 billion euros- the amount comes to 6.57 billion euros, i.e. 0.1825 billion euros per plane – this is the cost that includes coast of a bare plane plus cost of weaponry and spares etc. per plane. (To purchase x number of planes excluding the facility of India specific enhancement , we would have to pay 0.1825*x billion euros). Therefore, now multiply this by 126, it comes 22.995 billion euros. We may now add the total cost of India specific enhancements of 1.3 billion euros, the aggregate cost, as per Mr. Ram’s logic, would come to 23.295 billion euros. The total cost per plane comes to 0.190 billion euros. Thus the comparison is 0.219 billion euros per plane versus 0.190 billion euros per plane. Thus the price has increased by 15 percent and not by 41 per cent as claimed. And to enjoy this price difference the country was required to shell out huge amount of Rs.1.63 trillion !( 23.295* 70=Rs. 1630 billion)
And money trail will never be found, thanks to a noisy species called “journalists”. They have completely spoiled the game. The groundwork was being done for multi year reaping of harvest by making a huge and lucrative project easily available to Anil Ambani, because he was seen as what’s called in Gujarati, “Apdo Manus”, meaning a confidant, literally meaning, “our man”. We all know how, because of spoilsport noisy journalists, what was supposed to be a cakewalk for Mr Ambani has turned out to be sticky wicket for him, and has put Mr Modi himself on a back foot. He is so much on back foot that he may get out “hit wicket”!
Trail of “money” is visible as trail of illegal and intangible “gratification” obtained by Mr Modi. Even if no money changed hands, Mr Modi has benefitted an UNSUITABLE candidate “for the gratification of his personal ego, by misusing his official position, and by risking our country’s security and wasting our national funds”. Surely it’s corruption of some sort!
(Whatever has transpired in Rafale, has not transpired due to Mr Modi’s PERSONAL FRIENDSHIP with anyone in France but because of his official status as prime minister of India.)
What ever happened in Rafael deal is very unworthy of the situation. Now whatever is said now is that, it could have been avoided had the purchases were approved and finalized during UPA’s regime. Nobody is questioning them as why it didn’t happen then? Why was nation’s security not prioritized?
Mr. Ram wants to hang an imaginary impropeity on the rafeal deal. But try as he might he finds not even an imaginary trail. So he freaks out that he can’t find one.
Ram in his own wisdom says there is no money trial in Rafeal deal.My dear Ram I say you erred on wrong side .In the name national security and purchase of arms ,nation can not be fooled by Rhetorics and dancing on the stage and dragging army and patriotism to play. This is an internal governmental agreement without sovereign guarantee. Everybody with some knowledge know the limitations of comfort letter.The agreement is in fly away condition so where is place for offset partner. Indian government do not have any MOU with Dassault as such India can not proceed against Dassault in case of any dispute whatsoever ever. How many Indians believe that Dassault has choosen Anil defence as offset partner without any indication from Mr Modi. Is it not true that then defence Minister parrikar said in the TV panel interview that he did not know about deal, Mr Modi put the deal the and I endorse it.Is it not true Anil group failed to pay Rs550/ crs to Ericson as committed in the supreme court and it is an offence where imprisonment is for 6 months.?Is it not true in IDBI case Anil group is facing bankruptcy under IBC2016. ? What is the financial status and jet manufacturing capacity of Anil group. Anil group purchased the land at Nagpur only after Dassault invested Rs245/ crs in Anil group. Pl do a fact check
N Ram’s logic is opaque. He considered the 2016 price with a scenario of what could have been the price with India-specific enhancements if the bid had been accepted in 2009-2012. This didn’t happen and is just a wishful thinking. If we think of options available in 2025-2016, the calculations would be as below: The total contracted price for 36 planes is 7.87 billion euros , i.e. 0.219 billion euros per plane. Now reduce 1.3 billion euros from the total cost of 7.87 billion euros- the amount comes to 6.57 billion euros, i.e. 0.1825 billion euros per plane – this is the cost that includes coast of a bare plane plus cost of weaponry and spares etc. per plane. (To purchase x number of planes excluding the facility of India specific enhancement , we would have to pay 0.1825*x billion euros). Therefore, now multiply this by 126, it comes 22.995 billion euros. We may now add the total cost of India specific enhancements of 1.3 billion euros, the aggregate cost, as per Mr. Ram’s logic, would come to 23.295 billion euros. The total cost per plane comes to 0.190 billion euros. Thus the comparison is 0.219 billion euros per plane versus 0.190 billion euros per plane. Thus the price has increased by 15 percent and not by 41 per cent as claimed. And to enjoy this price difference the country was required to shell out huge amount of Rs.1.63 trillion !( 23.295* 70=Rs. 1630 billion)
And money trail will never be found, thanks to a noisy species called “journalists”. They have completely spoiled the game. The groundwork was being done for multi year reaping of harvest by making a huge and lucrative project easily available to Anil Ambani, because he was seen as what’s called in Gujarati, “Apdo Manus”, meaning a confidant, literally meaning, “our man”. We all know how, because of spoilsport noisy journalists, what was supposed to be a cakewalk for Mr Ambani has turned out to be sticky wicket for him, and has put Mr Modi himself on a back foot. He is so much on back foot that he may get out “hit wicket”!
Trail of “money” is visible as trail of illegal and intangible “gratification” obtained by Mr Modi. Even if no money changed hands, Mr Modi has benefitted an UNSUITABLE candidate “for the gratification of his personal ego, by misusing his official position, and by risking our country’s security and wasting our national funds”. Surely it’s corruption of some sort!
(Whatever has transpired in Rafale, has not transpired due to Mr Modi’s PERSONAL FRIENDSHIP with anyone in France but because of his official status as prime minister of India.)