General Rawat said there shouldn't be much concern over it as India is also carrying out similar activities and stated that the forces have adequate reserves to counter any threat.
MEA spokesperson Anurag Srivastava said that both countries agreed that restoration of peace, tranquility would be essential for the overall development of bilateral ties.
14 Corps Commander Lt Gen Harinder Singh is scheduled to meet China’s Southern Xinjiang Military District chief at Chushul-Moldo border personnel meeting point Saturday.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said the two countries have unimpeded communication channels and hoped the issue can be resolved through dialogue and consultations.
In episode 475 of #CutTheClutter, Shekhar Gupta explains why Nepal is criticising India on Covid-19 and Lipulekh Pass, and how China figures in this equation.
Former NSA Shivshankar Menon says impact of Covid will lead to “huge reputational loss” for China as well as other countries. He also cautions India against aligning with US or China.
The claim that VB-GRAMG provides an employment guarantee is incorrect. The only guarantee is to 'empower' the Centre to allow partial implementation in notified areas alone.
It is argued that India-Israel ties are moving from buyer–seller dynamic to one focused on joint development & manufacturing partnership, a shift 'more durable' than traditional arms sales.
Don’t blame misfortune. This is colossal incompetence and insensitivity. So bad, heads would have rolled even in the old PSU-era Indian Airlines and Air India.
Such a pusillaminous article whose advise must be outrightly rejected by all Indians. A country of India’s size and strength will not be a door mat for Chinese. Agressor and expansionist Countries like China only respects strength and India must stand up against them with all their might. If China meddles in Leh and Kashmir, then India also can in Tibet and South China Sea.
We need to define India ‘s long term interests. Economic and Security in a realistic way. With US increasing its pressure on China certainly China would be inclined to wean India away and consolidate its position further in South Asia. This should be seen as a window of opportunity by India to finally negotiate its boundary / territorial dispute with China. Walk the path of cooperation rather than Confrontation. This approach may also assist Dalai Lama to secure Tibetan autonomy. Independent Tibet is no longer possible.
I don’t understand why India’s hands should be tied as pointed out by these so-called experts. The Tibetan people considered Chinese occupation of Tibet as invasion and they fled because they were opposed to China. It is Chinese responsibility to win back the Tibetan people, why should India keep quiet? Please note, India lost to China in 1962 because it never expected China to attack. China realized this in 1967 when it got a bloody nose. Moreover, China’s win was very small compared to India’s win over Pakistan in 1971 which gave birth to a new country. So I never understand when these spineless experts comment that India’s hands are tied. India’s response should be mature to China’s aggression.
Such a pusillaminous article whose advise must be outrightly rejected by all Indians. A country of India’s size and strength will not be a door mat for Chinese. Agressor and expansionist Countries like China only respects strength and India must stand up against them with all their might. If China meddles in Leh and Kashmir, then India also can in Tibet and South China Sea.
We need to define India ‘s long term interests. Economic and Security in a realistic way. With US increasing its pressure on China certainly China would be inclined to wean India away and consolidate its position further in South Asia. This should be seen as a window of opportunity by India to finally negotiate its boundary / territorial dispute with China. Walk the path of cooperation rather than Confrontation. This approach may also assist Dalai Lama to secure Tibetan autonomy. Independent Tibet is no longer possible.
Such a defeatist attitude.
The Chinese can keep raising Kashmir as and when they please, call revocation of status quo illegal and we’re not even supposed to utter a word?
There is an escalatory ladder that we should employ to send a clear message that comments on India’s core issues are not welcome.
Quad and other multilateral organzations become more and more important for India’s security.
I don’t understand why India’s hands should be tied as pointed out by these so-called experts. The Tibetan people considered Chinese occupation of Tibet as invasion and they fled because they were opposed to China. It is Chinese responsibility to win back the Tibetan people, why should India keep quiet? Please note, India lost to China in 1962 because it never expected China to attack. China realized this in 1967 when it got a bloody nose. Moreover, China’s win was very small compared to India’s win over Pakistan in 1971 which gave birth to a new country. So I never understand when these spineless experts comment that India’s hands are tied. India’s response should be mature to China’s aggression.