The top court has refused to stay the Madras High Court order quashing criminal prosecution against the Chidambarams as requested by the Income Tax dept.
Munir indicates that he’s willing to go for broke, even if it risks taking his country “and half the world” down with him. It’s important to understand where he is coming from.
India’s industrial output growth saw a 10-month low in June, with Index of Industrial Production (IIP) growing by mere 1.5% as against 1.9% in May 2025.
Standing up to America is usually not a personal risk for a leader in India. Any suggestions of foreign pressure unites India behind who they see as leading them in that fight.
Certainly yes. Any one who knows about the inhuman, well planned murder, of her own daughter, and the elaborate cover up she has made to conceal the crime, can easily make out her criminal mind set.
This is the height of revengeful mentality of the rulers, to absolve the culprit of the said money laundering, and make her the approver, just to corner and harass a person who no involvement with that crime. The entire country know about Ms Indrani Mukherjee’s heinous crime and her manipulations.
Ppl It is not pro PC or antiPC, one shd bear in mind that now a days no politician is innocent. And it appears from Sristi’s comment he/she is remembering the good great picture Mother India, in witch the honest Mother shot her own son in open public view. It was for a noble cause. Here the reality is quite different and opposite. The one who is unfaithful to the society and self is put before the court as a ‘witness’. Whether anybody’s concious agrees with? God save our great Nation.
What catastrophic times. Mass murderers in power who justify that as being true Indian! I did want dictatorship for India but not this one. God help lower castes and religious minorities in this country.
I rolled my eyes when I read “High society is not particularly kind to ambitious women on the make”. She was on the power list of 50 women to watch out for. True, but for entirely different reasons, I suppose.
Maybe this is how Indian politics and business works in reality, except for a few honorable exceptions.
Chidambaram is and will always be intelligent chor, he is 2000 % corrupt, no one can have the property that he and his son own without any industry by being honest, just look what the poor people of india are being deprived and cheated off by our political bosses to loot india’s vast resources
A women who tried to frame her daughter as sister, murdered her for xyz reasons, I think as per current Indian political ruling system we must believe her, only then we can become real shikandis. I hope atleast few people of our country still remember the slogan “Satyameva Jayate”.
In Hiren pandya murder case, sorrabuddien and his colleagues confessed the role of amit shah, at that time people had opinion of how to believe the words of these criminals, though they have any hidden gain. Here Indrani has some gain here. PC may be corrupt so as Amit Shah.
Whatever , I would say that she should be given the minimum sentence . She looks so vunerable , murder committed due to fear of being exposed or blackmail. The law needs to take a lenient view. She is not a habitual criminal.
Sad state of affairs in the country where a murderer is most saught after person and he who took millions of people out of poverty is being treated like a common criminal
Dear print! Your writers are trying their best to taint the witness and prove Chidambaram is innocent. Chidambaram is a tainted neta. Let courts prove his guilt or innocence. Just because Indrani is convicted in a murder case… Her credibility as a witness need not be questioned. Remember the Delhi High court already named Chidambaram “the kingpin”
CRIME COMMITTED BY INDRANI HAD DEFINITELY A MOTIVE & UNLESS MOTIVES TO BLAME/ALLEGATIONS ARE PROVEN TO ASCERTAIN BENEFITS INTENDED BY INDRANI, NONE SHOULD THINK ABOUT ANY SLIPPAGES IN HER STATEMENTS ON CHIDAMBARAM. SLIGHTEST CORROBORATING EVIDENCE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ADEQUATE ENOUGH BECAUSE AS THE LAWYER, CHIDU & KARTI BOTH MUST HAVE ALREADY DONE ENOUGH TO DESTROY EVIDENCES.
Not to forget Amit Shah is taking badla on Chidabaram because Shah was sent to jail while PC was HM and now it’s his turn he thinks. What a shame….since last 5 years they have not been able to get evidence and using Indrani who is a criminal murdering her own daughter. The article clearly tells what is her take in life so to get away with her case and the politician to their benefit going on her words…..the SC should not heed to such tactics and to insist on proper evidence and action as per law and not on allegation. Hope SC upholds law
Every thing possible in India. Looks like Indrani is a proffisinal witness found out side the small courts in India. Cost may very. It is laughable that our courts trust a born criminal as known from her back ground and past activities.God bless all of us
Many of us have already passed judgement on whether PC is corrupt or no depending upon which party we support. Forget the political affiliation we may have for a moment. This lady is in jail since 2015 for murder of her own daughter by torching her with the help of the driver and her ex husband which is a third degree murder. She has a suspect background from the beginning and have multiple children through multiple people. Her life was just hanging on a thin thread and which over a period of time has become thick rope thanks to our investigating agencies. Her murder trial has not even started.. are we going to decide the fate of PC by the murderer turned approver’s statement for settling political scores. Though there might be immediate setback for PC but when the trial starts many things will be fiercely challenged and fought.
We should forget or overlooked that Amit Shah was sent to jail when P Chitambramb was HM now Amit Shah is HM. From a common man’s point of view both Amit Shah and P Chitambramb are Criminals former first did crime in Gujarat then killed Judge and the latter one took bribe. Only God can punish in India might is always right.
Is chidambaram corrupt or not?That is not a question of Hamletian proportion. The germane question here , is the pursuit of ‘truth’ ,’nothing but the truth’, as sacrosanct as made out by the ‘ bhakt’.The truth I believe will prevail in this case and it is here that God and religion has it’s uses , finally ‘one day’,when it’s all over, justice will prevail,ahem,Jai Shri ram ,inshallah to that.
Chidambaram if found guilty, let him face punishment. Why to bring a witness whose credibility. Tomorrow any criminal can be tuned around witness approver to nail political opponent.
If she is speaking the ‘truth’, her status as ‘murder accused’ should not have any bearing on the weight of her statement. The defense will naturally use that as an excuse to ‘discredit’ her testimony. But facts are facts, even if stated by an accused in a different case. In these proceedings, ‘SHE” is NOT on trial, but PC is. There is no law barring an accused from testifying. Nor is an accused a ‘liar’ ipso facto. The CBI however has a job proving that the meting did indeed take place and what was said then.
Just because she is convicted for murder, we cannot say Chidambaram is a clean person and she is a liar. Each case has it’s own merits to be investigated and punished if found guilty. One doesn’t absolve the other.
Certainly yes. Any one who knows about the inhuman, well planned murder, of her own daughter, and the elaborate cover up she has made to conceal the crime, can easily make out her criminal mind set.
This is the height of revengeful mentality of the rulers, to absolve the culprit of the said money laundering, and make her the approver, just to corner and harass a person who no involvement with that crime. The entire country know about Ms Indrani Mukherjee’s heinous crime and her manipulations.
I wish it had a proof reading before getting published. Peter is her husband and not “brother”.
Ppl It is not pro PC or antiPC, one shd bear in mind that now a days no politician is innocent. And it appears from Sristi’s comment he/she is remembering the good great picture Mother India, in witch the honest Mother shot her own son in open public view. It was for a noble cause. Here the reality is quite different and opposite. The one who is unfaithful to the society and self is put before the court as a ‘witness’. Whether anybody’s concious agrees with? God save our great Nation.
Let the truth come out in it’s time. However, poetically written…lovely!
What catastrophic times. Mass murderers in power who justify that as being true Indian! I did want dictatorship for India but not this one. God help lower castes and religious minorities in this country.
I rolled my eyes when I read “High society is not particularly kind to ambitious women on the make”. She was on the power list of 50 women to watch out for. True, but for entirely different reasons, I suppose.
Maybe this is how Indian politics and business works in reality, except for a few honorable exceptions.
Chidambaram is and will always be intelligent chor, he is 2000 % corrupt, no one can have the property that he and his son own without any industry by being honest, just look what the poor people of india are being deprived and cheated off by our political bosses to loot india’s vast resources
A women who tried to frame her daughter as sister, murdered her for xyz reasons, I think as per current Indian political ruling system we must believe her, only then we can become real shikandis. I hope atleast few people of our country still remember the slogan “Satyameva Jayate”.
The print, persons/entities like you can be hired by any elements. Tainting the witness though she from dubious background. Cheap, mean u print media.
In Hiren pandya murder case, sorrabuddien and his colleagues confessed the role of amit shah, at that time people had opinion of how to believe the words of these criminals, though they have any hidden gain. Here Indrani has some gain here. PC may be corrupt so as Amit Shah.
A PROSTITUTE IS ALWAYS APROOOOSTITUE, UR A KILLER ALSO…
HELK WITH UUUUUUUU. BLOODY SHIT.
Whatever , I would say that she should be given the minimum sentence . She looks so vunerable , murder committed due to fear of being exposed or blackmail. The law needs to take a lenient view. She is not a habitual criminal.
Daughter killers could be patriots too.
Very good logic by the way by the journalist… That means you find Chidambaram innocent…
Sad state of affairs in the country where a murderer is most saught after person and he who took millions of people out of poverty is being treated like a common criminal
Dear print! Your writers are trying their best to taint the witness and prove Chidambaram is innocent. Chidambaram is a tainted neta. Let courts prove his guilt or innocence. Just because Indrani is convicted in a murder case… Her credibility as a witness need not be questioned. Remember the Delhi High court already named Chidambaram “the kingpin”
CRIME COMMITTED BY INDRANI HAD DEFINITELY A MOTIVE & UNLESS MOTIVES TO BLAME/ALLEGATIONS ARE PROVEN TO ASCERTAIN BENEFITS INTENDED BY INDRANI, NONE SHOULD THINK ABOUT ANY SLIPPAGES IN HER STATEMENTS ON CHIDAMBARAM. SLIGHTEST CORROBORATING EVIDENCE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ADEQUATE ENOUGH BECAUSE AS THE LAWYER, CHIDU & KARTI BOTH MUST HAVE ALREADY DONE ENOUGH TO DESTROY EVIDENCES.
Not to forget Amit Shah is taking badla on Chidabaram because Shah was sent to jail while PC was HM and now it’s his turn he thinks. What a shame….since last 5 years they have not been able to get evidence and using Indrani who is a criminal murdering her own daughter. The article clearly tells what is her take in life so to get away with her case and the politician to their benefit going on her words…..the SC should not heed to such tactics and to insist on proper evidence and action as per law and not on allegation. Hope SC upholds law
Every thing possible in India. Looks like Indrani is a proffisinal witness found out side the small courts in India. Cost may very. It is laughable that our courts trust a born criminal as known from her back ground and past activities.God bless all of us
A multi-dimentional criminal. Great.
Many of us have already passed judgement on whether PC is corrupt or no depending upon which party we support. Forget the political affiliation we may have for a moment. This lady is in jail since 2015 for murder of her own daughter by torching her with the help of the driver and her ex husband which is a third degree murder. She has a suspect background from the beginning and have multiple children through multiple people. Her life was just hanging on a thin thread and which over a period of time has become thick rope thanks to our investigating agencies. Her murder trial has not even started.. are we going to decide the fate of PC by the murderer turned approver’s statement for settling political scores. Though there might be immediate setback for PC but when the trial starts many things will be fiercely challenged and fought.
We should forget or overlooked that Amit Shah was sent to jail when P Chitambramb was HM now Amit Shah is HM. From a common man’s point of view both Amit Shah and P Chitambramb are Criminals former first did crime in Gujarat then killed Judge and the latter one took bribe. Only God can punish in India might is always right.
Is chidambaram corrupt or not?That is not a question of Hamletian proportion. The germane question here , is the pursuit of ‘truth’ ,’nothing but the truth’, as sacrosanct as made out by the ‘ bhakt’.The truth I believe will prevail in this case and it is here that God and religion has it’s uses , finally ‘one day’,when it’s all over, justice will prevail,ahem,Jai Shri ram ,inshallah to that.
Chidambaram if found guilty, let him face punishment. Why to bring a witness whose credibility. Tomorrow any criminal can be tuned around witness approver to nail political opponent.
If she is speaking the ‘truth’, her status as ‘murder accused’ should not have any bearing on the weight of her statement. The defense will naturally use that as an excuse to ‘discredit’ her testimony. But facts are facts, even if stated by an accused in a different case. In these proceedings, ‘SHE” is NOT on trial, but PC is. There is no law barring an accused from testifying. Nor is an accused a ‘liar’ ipso facto. The CBI however has a job proving that the meting did indeed take place and what was said then.
We have such a porous system, one would never write off someone till the Last Post is sounded.
Just because she is convicted for murder, we cannot say Chidambaram is a clean person and she is a liar. Each case has it’s own merits to be investigated and punished if found guilty. One doesn’t absolve the other.
Wonderful logic from you! Made my Sunday. The future of India is very bright indeed.