The star joins a handful of Bollywood celebrities, such as Zoya Akhtar, Swara Bhasker, Anurag Kashyap, Sonam Kapoor, Alia Bhatt, who have spoken against the violence.
Asking Goa to give up 4% of a river’s flow to help parched districts seems reasonable, moral. But it masks a deeper ethical problem: who bears the burden of the ‘greater common good’?
SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
India exited the Indo-Russian FGFA programme in 2018. But now it might procure at least 2 squadrons of Su-57 aircraft from Russia and evaluate Russian proposal to manufacture them in India.
Many really smart people now share the position that playing cricket with Pakistan is politically, strategically and morally wrong. It is just a poor appreciation of competitive sport.
Dear Mr Shorey
There is nothing wrong in CAA provided you personally take responsibility of looking after the need of those refugees. I hope you are aware of the state of the economy of this country. Where there is no job for existing citizens, how can we even think about bringing more people on this country? This is irrespective of the debate whether the CAA is discriminatory or unconstitutional or not. Further, what is currently happening in JNU is to my believe nothing to do with CAA or NRC.
Celebrity presence is an endorsement for a cause. Remember Jane Fonda during the Vietnam war and her loud words directed at the crowd: ““The Army builds a tolerance for violence; I find that intolerable.” Well, Padukone is not just a huge name but also has better image than Swara Bhaskara, who’s no more than a frivolous hypocrite. However, at the same time, it cannot be denied that DP is commercially savvy. who understands how to kill two birds with one stone. Interesting developments!!!
Yes RR I totally agree with you and it is like a killing two birds by throwing one stone. Snaps with injured guy is a pivotal. It is nothing but fooling the people and totally commercial interest. Tx.
As a professional actor, although I have not seen any of his films, Ranvir Shorey must be accustomed to using a script written by someone else. One would be most impressed if he could write an essay on an A 4 sheet, explaining the salient features of CAA and NRC and the linkage, if any, between them. He might wish to reflect why, in a democracy, a citizen expressing an honest opinion adds up to her “ putting her neck out “. Earlier it was her aquiline nose that was under threat.
The pretty lady has shown more guts – one will not use an indecorous word – than the studs of Bollywood. One does not blame them, of course, by declining to attend that dinner, they too were signalling acute discomfort. JNU at the moment is the least propitious venue to promote a film. Especially courageous considering that Ms Deepika Padukone is also the producer, has a lot riding on it. 2. What we should ask is why a simple act of decency – recall the way she greeted President Aishe Ghosh with folded hands – should stand out in a nation of a billion people, be seen as something out of the film High Noon. 3. When we saw Om Shanti Om, told my wife, This girl will go very far in life.
again the women take a more progressive stand! proud to be an indian woman!
Dear Mr Shorey
There is nothing wrong in CAA provided you personally take responsibility of looking after the need of those refugees. I hope you are aware of the state of the economy of this country. Where there is no job for existing citizens, how can we even think about bringing more people on this country? This is irrespective of the debate whether the CAA is discriminatory or unconstitutional or not. Further, what is currently happening in JNU is to my believe nothing to do with CAA or NRC.
JNU symbolises civil rights and freedom in this time. Deepikaji endorsed it. Let her tribe increase.
Celebrity presence is an endorsement for a cause. Remember Jane Fonda during the Vietnam war and her loud words directed at the crowd: ““The Army builds a tolerance for violence; I find that intolerable.” Well, Padukone is not just a huge name but also has better image than Swara Bhaskara, who’s no more than a frivolous hypocrite. However, at the same time, it cannot be denied that DP is commercially savvy. who understands how to kill two birds with one stone. Interesting developments!!!
Yes RR I totally agree with you and it is like a killing two birds by throwing one stone. Snaps with injured guy is a pivotal. It is nothing but fooling the people and totally commercial interest. Tx.
As a professional actor, although I have not seen any of his films, Ranvir Shorey must be accustomed to using a script written by someone else. One would be most impressed if he could write an essay on an A 4 sheet, explaining the salient features of CAA and NRC and the linkage, if any, between them. He might wish to reflect why, in a democracy, a citizen expressing an honest opinion adds up to her “ putting her neck out “. Earlier it was her aquiline nose that was under threat.
The pretty lady has shown more guts – one will not use an indecorous word – than the studs of Bollywood. One does not blame them, of course, by declining to attend that dinner, they too were signalling acute discomfort. JNU at the moment is the least propitious venue to promote a film. Especially courageous considering that Ms Deepika Padukone is also the producer, has a lot riding on it. 2. What we should ask is why a simple act of decency – recall the way she greeted President Aishe Ghosh with folded hands – should stand out in a nation of a billion people, be seen as something out of the film High Noon. 3. When we saw Om Shanti Om, told my wife, This girl will go very far in life.