It aligns with 2023 National Curriculum Framework, updated to reflect NEP, which aims to reduce high-stakes nature of board exams by allowing students two attempts per year.
The board released a draft policy Tuesday introducing reforms that are in line with 2023 National Curriculum Framework for school education, which was updated to align with NEP 2020.
PARAKH, a body under NCERT notified last year following NEP recommendations, also working on sample question bank to help bring equivalence among boards, says CEO Indrani Bhaduri.
CBSE has more than 16 full-fledged regional offices in the country manned by permanent employees. These regional offices monitor every aspect of exams, from transportation to selection of exam centres, custodians, invigilators, and evaluation.
The IGST component of total import duty collections is growing faster than that from Customs duty. And states enjoy a larger share in the rapidly growing pie of IGST on imports.
India’s industrial output growth saw a 10-month low in June, with Index of Industrial Production (IIP) growing by mere 1.5% as against 1.9% in May 2025.
Standing up to America is usually not a personal risk for a leader in India. Any suggestions of foreign pressure unites India behind who they see as leading them in that fight.
Great step, but it would only be meaningful if accompanied by a fundamental shift in mathematics education, viz. a shift away from abstract formal maths completely divorced from the empirical evidence (pratyakshapramāna) that all Bharatiya sciences including ganita hold to be the supreme kind of proof. Education must fully embrace ganita grounded in the philosophy of shūnyatā and accepting empirical proof as valid.
Also as a side note, the philosophy of our sciences needs to become Bharatiya too, e.g. free it from the mechanistic universe ideology and the tyranny of “method” (not arguing for science without method but against the imposition of one method grounded in Western philosophy).
Great step, but it would only be meaningful if accompanied by a fundamental shift in mathematics education, viz. a shift away from abstract formal maths completely divorced from the empirical evidence (pratyakshapramāna) that all Bharatiya sciences including ganita hold to be the supreme kind of proof. Education must fully embrace ganita grounded in the philosophy of shūnyatā and accepting empirical proof as valid.
Also as a side note, the philosophy of our sciences needs to become Bharatiya too, e.g. free it from the mechanistic universe ideology and the tyranny of “method” (not arguing for science without method but against the imposition of one method grounded in Western philosophy).