Allen v. Farrow has been made in a time that has freed us to take sides. It’s becoming more and more okay to accept that only one side of the story can be true.
Rosneft, the Russian state-owned oil behemoth, has large interests in India. Reliance has a contract to purchase 500,000 barrels of crude per day from the firm.
Fresh details of operation conducted by IAF, Army have come out in gazette notification giving citations of those who were awarded Vir Chakra for their bravery.
Education, reservations, govt jobs are meant to bring equality and dignity. That we are a long way from that is evident in the shoe thrown at the CJI and the suicide of Haryana IPS officer. The film Homebound has a lesson too.
Allen v. Farrow has been made in a time that has freed us to take sides without the dread of appearing simplistic.
Great. We live in a culture where it’s fine to be almost childishly simplistic, even primitive, in our representation of a very complex world, and we no longer have to dread being called out on it.
Allen v. Farrow has been made in a time that has freed us to take sides without the dread of appearing simplistic.
Great. We live in a culture where it’s fine to be almost childishly simplistic, even primitive, in our representation of a very complex world, and we no longer have to dread being called out on it.
And that’s a good thing…WHY?