scorecardresearch
Add as a preferred source on Google
Wednesday, January 7, 2026
Support Our Journalism
HomePageTurnerBook ExcerptsGovt doesn't name tribal lands on maps for megaprojects

Govt doesn’t name tribal lands on maps for megaprojects

In ‘Island on Edge: The Great Nicobar Crisis,' Pankaj Sekhsaria explores the plight of the indigenous Nicobarese and how mega-development projects threaten their existence.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

The autochthonous tribes of Shompen and Nicobarese have  lived on the island of Great Nicobar for thousands of years. The  Shompen are a semi-nomadic, hunter-gatherer community and  they live deep in the forests in Great Nicobar. They are, by and  large, isolated from the rest of the population on the island. They are a particularly vulnerable tribal group with a population of just  around 250 people.  

The Nicobarese are also a tribal community but they are  largely a settled population. They grow plantations, fish and hunt,  and in recent years, they have also taken up daily wage work to  make a living. They are spread across the Nicobar Islands like Car Nicobar, Little Nicobar and Great Nicobar. The population of the  Nicobarese in Great Nicobar is about 1,200. 

In the Nicobarese language, the Great Nicobar Island is called  ‘Patai Takaru’, meaning ‘the big island’, because, with an area of  920 square kilometres, the island is the biggest one in the Nicobar  group of islands. We do not know how the Shompen conceptualise  their land and forests because their language has not been  deciphered yet.  

The project will displace Nicobarese and Shompen communities  whose way of life is closely connected to their lands. It will take  over forests comprising settled villages and areas used for foraging,  hunting and plantations. Like Chingenh, Kirasis and Kurchinom  in Galathea Bay; In Haengloi and Pulo Baha in Pemmaya Bay; and  Kokeon, Bui Jayae and Pulo Pakka in Nanjappa Bay.  

‘All these villages will go when the project comes. These are  all tribal villages,’ Barnabas said, pointing to the map prepared by  Chandi, taped onto the wall in his office. Chandi prepared the map  between 2000 and 2004 when he was working with the Andaman  Nicobar Environment Team (ANET). Later, he went on to pursue  a PhD in the field of human ecology. To date, this remains the only  comprehensive map of the island that lists tribal lands. 

The map shows settlements like Chingenh, In Haengloi  and Kokeon along the south and southwest coasts of the island.  These are ancestral villages of the Nicobarese who were settled  by the government in a tribal colony in Rajiv Nagar after the 2004  tsunami. Some of these areas also belong to the Shompen. The two communities share a bartering relationship over forest and  agricultural products.  

In fact, Chingenh, which Barnabas pointed to on the map, is  located right in the area where the transshipment terminal is  proposed to be built in Galathea Bay. This location is a biodiversity  hotspot and serves as one of the largest nesting sites in the world  for giant leatherback turtles.  

The Nicobar division of the Andaman and Nicobar Forest  Department did not permit us to visit Galathea Bay even while a  steady stream of tourists and government officials from the island,  Port Blair and New Delhi were allowed and even escorted by  the department during the same time. Many of the officials were  visiting Galathea Bay for project-related work.  

A ‘Babu’s’ Idea of Demarcation 

It is no secret that, for decades now, the local administration in  Great Nicobar has been relying on the map prepared by Chandi  to identify tribal areas. The map was used as and when it was  convenient to contact the tribes but ignored when the proposed  project directly threatened the tribes’ way of life.  

The maps that have been used to plan the megaproject do not  list lands used by the two tribal communities. This, even while  it seeks to take over such lands. This disingenuity reveals that  no attempt was made to sincerely assess the impact of the land  acquisition on the affected communities or be deterred by the  protections that covered the land. The rescue and relief efforts  after the tsunami of 2004 relied heavily on Chandi’s map to locate  tribal areas. In fact, the office of the then Assistant Commissioner  in Campbell Bay specifically requested Chandi’s help in locating  tribal communities and their villages. Chandi also provided details  of tribal community demographics and land ownership patterns. 

After 2004, he added more Nicobarese settlements and  Shompen community areas to this map. However, given that  these are efforts undertaken by one individual, the map is not  exhaustive. It is safe to assume that there are many more unmapped  tribal settlements and foraging grounds, more so those belonging  to the Shompen community.  

This reporter visited and spoke to various officials from the  Andaman and Nicobar administration, such as the office of the  Assistant Commissioner (Campbell Bay), the Nicobar division of  the Forest Department and the Directorate of Tribal Welfare. None  of them possessed maps where tribal settlements and foraging  grounds were marked. Every office only displayed maps with  broad boundaries like revenue areas, tribal reserves and national  parks. 

‘The government has no proper map of tribal areas. There  has been no systematic mapping effort,’ said Vishvajit Pandya, an  anthropologist and Director of Andaman Nicobar Tribal Research  Institute under the Ministry of Tribal Affairs. ‘They use vague  language like “upper road Shompen” and “lower road Shompen”.  And these roads have been washed away in the [2004] tsunami! It’s  a babu’s idea of demarcation.’ Babu, in colloquial Hindi, means a  bureaucrat.  

Even the Anthropological Survey of India (AnSI), including its  regional centre in Andaman and Nicobar, does not have a map that  chalks out lands belonging to the Shompen and the Nicobarese in  Great Nicobar. This was confirmed by Anstice Justin, a Nicobarese  anthropologist and former deputy director of AnSI. Anstice also  belongs to the Nicobarese community from Car Nicobar. 

Consider the report prepared by AECOM, the consultancy  engaged by NITI Aayog to assess the feasibility of the megaproject.  The land use map contained in this report shows the location of  national parks, forest reserves and revenue lands but not tribal settlements and foraging grounds, something that is clearly shown  in the map prepared by Chandi (see Map 3).  

The documents submitted as part of environment clearance  also listed the project only in the revenue areas of Campbell Bay,  Govind Nagar, Joginder Nagar, Vijay Nagar, Laxminagar, Gandhi  Nagar and Shastri Nagar, completely ignoring the fact that tribal  areas will also be taken over. 

This excerpt from ‘Island on Edge: The Great Nicobar Crisis’ by Pankaj Sekhsaria has been published with permission from Westland Books.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular