‘Not allowing protests hurts India’s unity’: Read Bombay HC’s full judgment in anti-CAA protest case
Judiciary

‘Not allowing protests hurts India’s unity’: Read Bombay HC’s full judgment in anti-CAA protest case

The Bombay High Court quashed a lower court's order that barred an anti-CAA protest from taking place, saying people have right to express themselves under Article 19.

   

Bombay High Court

New Delhi: The Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court Thursday stated that protestors cannot be called “anti-nationals” or “traitors” just because they oppose one law, while quashing the orders of a magisterial court. The high court bench noted the magistrate’s order was only against those protesting against the amended citizenship law.

The court was hearing a petition filed by Iftekhar Zakee Shaikh, who wanted to hold peaceful demonstrations at old Idgah Maidan at Majalgaon in Maharahstra’s Beed district. Shaikh’s request was turned down by Beed’s additional district magistrate.

The two-judge bench of Justices T.V. Nalawade and M.G. Sewlikar went on to observe that under Article 19 of the Constitution people had the right to express themselves and granted the petitioner the right to to hold an indefinite protest against CAA.

Read the full judgment here:


Also read: Shaheen Bagh will not be seen as a national threat next week. Here’s why