scorecardresearch
Saturday, November 2, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeIndiaLaw student who accused Chinmayanand of rape questioned by SIT in extortion...

Law student who accused Chinmayanand of rape questioned by SIT in extortion case

UP Police’s SIT suspects law student was part of conspiracy to extort Rs 5 crore from Chinmayanand, the former BJP MP and Union minister.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: The law student who has accused former Union minister and BJP MP Chinmayanand of allegedly raping, threatening and physically assaulting her was Tuesday questioned at her house by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) in a case of extortion.

“Members of the SIT had come home and questioned her in connection with the extortion case,” the student’s brother told ThePrint.

She has maintained her stand that she wasn’t involved, the brother added.

He also said his family had moved an anticipatory bail in the Shahjahanpur district court. The plea will be heard on 26 September.

Last Friday, the SIT arrested three persons — Sanjay Singh, Sachin Senger and Vikram — for allegedly sending a text message to Chinmayanand to extort Rs 5 crore from him. The student is also a suspect in the case. Even though she had been not included as an accused in the FIR, she was on the SIT’s radar.

According to sources in the SIT, a complex web of phone calls and digital evidence, including a video and CCTV footage, suggested that the student too was part of the conspiracy hatched by the men to extort money from Chinmayanand.

The student, however, had denied these allegations, stating that it was attempt to make her case of sexual assault against Chinmayanand weak.


Also read: 4,300 calls, CCTV videos – How woman accusing Chinmayanand of rape is a ‘suspect’ herself


‘Exchanged several calls with arrested men’

The SIT claimed it had prepared a flowchart of call detail records and found that the law student and six of her friends exchanged over 4,300 calls since January. Of these, the most number of calls were exchanged in August — just before that alleged extortion call was made to Chinmayanand.

The police claimed that Sanjay, who reportedly is the student’s friend, installed WhatsApp on his mobile and activated the SIM card through which the message was sent and conveyed this to the student immediately.

“Sanjay was the centre of this operation, as all of these persons, including the girl, were in touch with him,” said a source in the SIT.

The SIT also claimed that Chinmayanand exchanged calls with the law student, her father and mother, who then made several calls to her.

The student is also seen in a video in which the three men can be seen discussing the extortion attempt, the SIT source alleged.

“Two of her friends are (seen) discussing how they sent a message to a powerful person (Chinmayanand) asking for Rs 5 crore and its implications while driving in a car. The student is seen sitting on the rear seat contributing actively to their conversation,” alleged a source in the UP Police.


Also read: I am ashamed of what I have done: Chinmayanand tells SIT when confronted with massage clips


The extortion case

On 22 August, Chinmayanand allegedly received a text message from an unknown number on WhatsApp, threatening that if he did not pay up Rs 5 crore, then his naked videos would be leaked online.

Speaking to ThePrint, Chinmayanand’s lawyer Om Singh had said after receiving the text, the BJP leader immediately forwarded it to him, asking him to inform the police and get the number traced.

“The text also said that if he tries to act smart, it will be him who will suffer in the end,” said Singh, adding that he reported the case to the police and lodged a formal complaint on behalf of Chinmayanand. “I also met senior police officers for the next two days and was assured that the number will be traced.”

However, before a case could be registered, the student posted a video on her Facebook profile on 24 August, alleging sexual assault, Singh claimed.

In the video, the student can be heard alleging that she was sexually harassed by a “sanyasi” who is also the “manager” of her college in Shahjahanpur.

“She did not name Chinmayanand in that video. May be it was a tactic to scare him. She released that video because she knew we have approached the police and now her involvement may come out in the public domain,” Singh said.

The police registered a case of extortion on the same night, he added.


Also read: 6 am massages, 2.30 pm ‘sex’ — law student recalls ‘horror sessions’ with Chinmayanand


This report has been updated to accurately reflect that the law student wasn’t arrested but questioned by the SIT.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

4 COMMENTS

  1. Utter disregard for human values seems to be a professed policy of the ruling dispensation which always goes overboard for protecting the perpetrators amongst them and punish the hapless victims! Examples galore!

  2. These gimmicks were seen before in the unnao rape case as well. BJP leaders are clearly using pressure tactics to divert and dilute the allegation against them. Finally, it is clear that BJP leadership is involved in the suppression of case against them and the BJP government stands fully supporting them. They do not take any action against the BJP leaders. They take mild action and try to dilute the case. Only the action is taken when the court issues the directives.

  3. just to save the skin of chimayanand

    how can one ignore this godman-cum-mla’s confession that he felt ashamed for message events?
    the police of UP has learned to shut eyes when perpetrators just cant escape from their wrongdoings…

  4. A complete travesty. It will create a false equivalence between perpetrator and victim of abuse. She is not running away, is not powerful enough to obstruct the course of justice.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular