The 1947 partition of India was driven by British strategic, economic, and intelligence agendas, creating enduring geopolitical and economic divisions that still impact South Asia today.
In India, a divide exists between those who trust the legal system and those who’ve faced its harsh realities, revealing a painful truth about justice, power, and societal indifference.
India's strategic role in global affairs resembles the wise elephant in The Jungle Book: strong, benevolent, and poised to lead with wisdom, if it nurtures its internal growth and unity first.
The discovery of unaccounted cash in a Delhi High Court judge's residence raises serious questions about transparency and accountability in India's judiciary, calling for urgent reform.
A tale of contrasting fortunes in space travel: while SpaceX outshines Boeing with reliability and cost-effectiveness, Boeing struggles with losses, delays, and safety issues in its crewed space missions.
A tale of transformation, where a once peaceful rural village loses its essence to urbanisation, resulting in overcrowding, pollution, and cultural erosion in Delhi’s urban villages.
Exploring the need for judicial accountability in India, advocating for reforms like elected district judges, regional high courts, and a separate Supreme Court for constitutional cases.
Private banks and startups in India face rising risks from inflated credit and equity valuations, leading to financial distress. Businesses must balance debt and equity for sustainable growth.
Western markets are capitalizing on India's ancient wellness practices, turning them into luxury commodities, while India struggles to protect and profit from its own cultural heritage.
While global corporations setting up GCCs in India continue to express confidence in availability of skilled AI engineers, the panel argued that India’s real challenge lies elsewhere.
Taylor ‘Fema’ Hiester, commander of USAF F-16 Viper Demo Team, hit out at air show organisers for continuing with the show after Wing Commander Namansh Syal lost his life in the incident.
It is a brilliant, reasonably priced, and mostly homemade aircraft with a stellar safety record; only two crashes in 24 years since its first flight. But its crash is a moment of introspection.
It was a truly insightful and exceptionally well-articulated read—your analysis is both compelling and enlightening. I fully agree with your perspective. One key takeaway that strongly resonated with me is the recognition that the partition of India was not merely the result of Hindu-Muslim differences, but a deliberate British strategy aimed at creating division and sustaining control through fragmentation.
It also prompts a deeper historical reflection: why was Cyril Radcliffe—a man entirely unfamiliar with the Indian subcontinent—given the immense responsibility of drawing borders that would shape the fate of millions? The consequences of such decisions are still felt across the region.
As an Afghan, I cannot overlook a parallel act of colonial imposition—the Durand Line. The decision by Sir Henry Mortimer Durand to arbitrarily draw a boundary between Afghanistan and British India not only violated Afghanistan’s territorial integrity but also severed deeply connected ethnic, cultural, and historical regions such as Pukhtunkhwa and Balochistan. These areas, rich in identity and resilience, were unjustly separated and continue to suffer under policies that echo colonial-era suppression.
The legacy of such British decisions has caused profound and lasting harm. Communities divided by artificial lines still struggle with marginalization and the denial of fundamental rights. Your work highlights the necessity of revisiting these historical injustices with both honesty and urgency.
Thank you Mr. Varun Chaturvedi for shedding light on this crucial subject.
It was a truly insightful and exceptionally well-articulated read—your analysis is both compelling and enlightening. I fully agree with your perspective. One key takeaway that strongly resonated with me is the recognition that the partition of India was not merely the result of Hindu-Muslim differences, but a deliberate British strategy aimed at creating division and sustaining control through fragmentation.
It also prompts a deeper historical reflection: why was Cyril Radcliffe—a man entirely unfamiliar with the Indian subcontinent—given the immense responsibility of drawing borders that would shape the fate of millions? The consequences of such decisions are still felt across the region.
As an Afghan, I cannot overlook a parallel act of colonial imposition—the Durand Line. The decision by Sir Henry Mortimer Durand to arbitrarily draw a boundary between Afghanistan and British India not only violated Afghanistan’s territorial integrity but also severed deeply connected ethnic, cultural, and historical regions such as Pukhtunkhwa and Balochistan. These areas, rich in identity and resilience, were unjustly separated and continue to suffer under policies that echo colonial-era suppression.
The legacy of such British decisions has caused profound and lasting harm. Communities divided by artificial lines still struggle with marginalization and the denial of fundamental rights. Your work highlights the necessity of revisiting these historical injustices with both honesty and urgency.
Thank you Mr. Varun Chaturvedi for shedding light on this crucial subject.