At Indology departments, India is presented as rich and complete — a civilisation to be approached with reverence, rather than curiosity and playfulness.
This census will map both the numbers and the incomes of various caste groups. Thereby providing a basis for those who call to exclude the 'creamy layer' from SC/ST reservation.
The Telangana government, which has still not even fully absorbed the TGSRTC, is now going to take over the Hyderabad metro rail. Expectations are not high.
Younger generations have ample reason to be upset with boomers — for getting bigger retirement benefits and leaving behind lots of debt. But these issues do not elicit much anger.
Indian corporate chiefs—from Ambani to Adani—are looking to China as a solution to their tech deficit. And China views India as a market where it can offload some excess production.
A young workforce entering a changing labour market needs rules that recognise mobility, skill transitions, and new forms of work. Laws rooted in past industrial models cannot serve this future.
For over three decades, AR Rahman has been a cultural ambassador of Indian pluralism. And yet, in today’s climate, that legacy seems disturbingly fragile.
Instead of buying more Mirages outright in early 2000s, the requirement was tweaked in favour of a medium-weight, multi-role fighter with Mirage-like performance.
Pakistan not only has zero chance of catching up with India in most areas, but will inevitably see the gap rising. Its leaders will offer its people the same snake oil in different bottles.
, 1. Subversion of Democratic Norms:
The assertion that amendments in the past decade have solely brought stability overlooks instances where constitutional changes have raised serious concerns about democratic erosion. For example, the abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir, while claimed to integrate the region more fully into India, has been criticized for bypassing democratic processes and silencing local political voices. This act not only destabilized the region but also set a precedent for unilateral executive actions.
2. Impact on Academic Freedom:
The claim that there is no danger to the Constitution under Modi’s leadership ignores the pressures exerted on academic institutions and scholars. There have been numerous reports of increased surveillance, censorship, and punitive actions against academics critical of the government. These actions compromise the independence of educational institutions and stifle critical inquiry, which is essential for a vibrant democracy.
3. Manipulation of Public Discourse:
The portrayal of constitutional amendments as purely stabilizing disregards the government’s role in influencing media narratives and public opinion. Government-friendly media channels often propagate a one-sided view, marginalizing dissenting voices. This manipulation of public discourse creates an environment where critical debate is suppressed, and propaganda thrives, undermining the fundamental democratic principle of informed citizenry.
4. Judicial Independence:
While the headline suggests constitutional stability, it fails to address concerns regarding the independence of the judiciary. The executive’s influence over judicial appointments and decisions has been a contentious issue. Instances of judicial verdicts favoring the government raise questions about the judiciary’s ability to act as a check on executive power, which is crucial for maintaining constitutional integrity.
5. Legislative Overreach:
The framing of amendments as stabilizing does not account for the legislative overreach observed in recent years. Laws such as the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) have sparked widespread protests and have been criticized for undermining the secular fabric of the Constitution. The passage of such laws, often without adequate parliamentary debate, exemplifies how the legislative process can be manipulated to serve political ends rather than uphold democratic principles.
6. Suppression of Dissent:
The article’s narrative ignores the broader context of increasing suppression of dissent. Activists, journalists, and students critical of the government have faced harassment, arrests, and violence. This trend of curbing dissent not only threatens individual freedoms but also erodes the foundational democratic principle of freedom of speech and expression.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, while the headline asserts that Modi poses no danger to the Constitution and that recent amendments have ensured stability, this perspective fails to consider the multifaceted ways in which democratic institutions and principles have been compromised. The intertwining of political agendas with academia and media, the suppression of dissent, and the undermining of judicial and legislative independence collectively pose significant risks to the democratic fabric of India. A truly stable democracy requires the protection of academic freedom, robust public discourse, and unwavering adherence to constitutional norms, all of which appear increasingly vulnerable in the current political climate.
propaganda puff piece
, 1. Subversion of Democratic Norms:
The assertion that amendments in the past decade have solely brought stability overlooks instances where constitutional changes have raised serious concerns about democratic erosion. For example, the abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir, while claimed to integrate the region more fully into India, has been criticized for bypassing democratic processes and silencing local political voices. This act not only destabilized the region but also set a precedent for unilateral executive actions.
2. Impact on Academic Freedom:
The claim that there is no danger to the Constitution under Modi’s leadership ignores the pressures exerted on academic institutions and scholars. There have been numerous reports of increased surveillance, censorship, and punitive actions against academics critical of the government. These actions compromise the independence of educational institutions and stifle critical inquiry, which is essential for a vibrant democracy.
3. Manipulation of Public Discourse:
The portrayal of constitutional amendments as purely stabilizing disregards the government’s role in influencing media narratives and public opinion. Government-friendly media channels often propagate a one-sided view, marginalizing dissenting voices. This manipulation of public discourse creates an environment where critical debate is suppressed, and propaganda thrives, undermining the fundamental democratic principle of informed citizenry.
4. Judicial Independence:
While the headline suggests constitutional stability, it fails to address concerns regarding the independence of the judiciary. The executive’s influence over judicial appointments and decisions has been a contentious issue. Instances of judicial verdicts favoring the government raise questions about the judiciary’s ability to act as a check on executive power, which is crucial for maintaining constitutional integrity.
5. Legislative Overreach:
The framing of amendments as stabilizing does not account for the legislative overreach observed in recent years. Laws such as the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) have sparked widespread protests and have been criticized for undermining the secular fabric of the Constitution. The passage of such laws, often without adequate parliamentary debate, exemplifies how the legislative process can be manipulated to serve political ends rather than uphold democratic principles.
6. Suppression of Dissent:
The article’s narrative ignores the broader context of increasing suppression of dissent. Activists, journalists, and students critical of the government have faced harassment, arrests, and violence. This trend of curbing dissent not only threatens individual freedoms but also erodes the foundational democratic principle of freedom of speech and expression.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, while the headline asserts that Modi poses no danger to the Constitution and that recent amendments have ensured stability, this perspective fails to consider the multifaceted ways in which democratic institutions and principles have been compromised. The intertwining of political agendas with academia and media, the suppression of dissent, and the undermining of judicial and legislative independence collectively pose significant risks to the democratic fabric of India. A truly stable democracy requires the protection of academic freedom, robust public discourse, and unwavering adherence to constitutional norms, all of which appear increasingly vulnerable in the current political climate.