Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
India’s energy debate is often cast as a binary: secure fossil fuels today or invest in clean energy for tomorrow. That’s a false choice. For an economy that imports over 85% of its crude oil and a substantial share of its gas, energy security and energy transition are two sides of the same coin. Treating them as competing goals risks getting both wrong.
Start with the hard numbers. Every $10 increase in crude prices typically adds billions to India’s import bill, widens the current account deficit and pushes up inflation. That feeds directly into pump prices, fertiliser subsidies and household budgets. In a conflict-prone world, price volatility is the rule, not the exception. Energy insecurity, therefore, is macroeconomic instability.
Yet the policy response remains split. India has crossed 180 GW of renewable capacity and is targeting 500 GW of non-fossil capacity by 2030. At the same time, coal still accounts for roughly 70% of electricity generation, and oil demand is projected to keep rising through the decade. This duality is not policy confusion; it reflects structural reality. A $3.5 trillion economy growing at 6-7% cannot flip its energy system overnight.
The real question is sequencing. Energy systems are capital-intensive and long-lived. Get the transition wrong, and you lock in stranded assets or, worse, face supply disruptions. Get it right, and you lower import dependence while maintaining reliability and affordability.
Consider power. Solar and wind are now the cheapest sources of new capacity in India. But they are intermittent. Peak demand has already crossed 240 GW, and managing it requires firm power. Until storage scales meaningfully and grids become more flexible, coal will remain the backbone of baseload supply. The task is not to wish coal away but to reduce its intensity through better plant efficiency, flexible operation and a rapid build-out of storage, transmission and demand response.
Transport tells a similar story. Electrification is gaining traction, but oil will dominate in the medium term, especially in freight and aviation. That makes diversification of crude sources, expansion of strategic petroleum reserves and aggressive fuel-efficiency standards essential. At the same time, accelerating EV adoption especially in two and three wheelers and urban fleets, can shave incremental oil demand where it matters most.
This is where the transition strengthens security. Every gigawatt of domestic solar displaces imported fuel. Every electric bus cuts diesel demand. Green hydrogen, if it reaches cost parity, can reduce dependence on imported LNG and fertilisers in hard-to-abate sectors. In effect, the clean transition is the only durable route to energy sovereignty.
But ambition is outrunning execution. Renewable deployment still runs into land acquisition hurdles and transmission bottlenecks. Distribution companies remain financially fragile, delaying payments and distorting price signals. Battery storage costs are falling but remain high for large-scale deployment. Domestic manufacturing boosted by PLI schemes is improving, but scale and competitiveness are still works in progress.
Financing is the binding constraint. The transition will require hundreds of billions in the next decade. India cannot rely solely on public capital. It needs deep, liquid domestic markets, green bonds, infrastructure investment trusts, blended finance as well as predictable access to low-cost global capital. Without cheaper finance, the levelised cost advantage of renewables gets eroded at the project level.
There is also a political economy to manage. Coal-dependent regions face real risks of job loss and revenue decline. A “just transition” cannot be an afterthought. It needs targeted reskilling, local industrial diversification and fiscal support to states that bear the transition’s upfront costs.
What India needs is policy coherence. Short-term actions like securing crude supplies, managing coal output must align with long-term goals: electrification, storage and green fuels. That means stable tariffs, credible carbon signals, faster clearances for transmission, and a clear roadmap for phasing down the most inefficient thermal capacity. Stop-start policy undermines investor confidence; consistency crowds in capital.
The bigger mistake would be to delay the transition in the name of security. That only prolongs exposure to volatile imports. Conversely, rushing ahead without fixing grids, storage and DISCOM finances risks blackouts and backlash. The middle path is not compromise; it is strategy.
India doesn’t have the luxury of choosing between growth and decarbonisation. It must deliver both. The endgame is clear: an energy system that is diversified, resilient and progressively less import-dependent. The transition will be uneven, but the direction cannot be.
Energy security versus transition is a false debate. The real test is whether India can combine the two in a way that is both fast enough to make a difference and strong enough to endure.
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.