Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
India’s nine-wicket win in Sydney was marketed as a return to vintage glory. Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli back in their elements, smiling, hugging, rekindling nostalgia. The headlines wrote “Ro-Ko Roars Again.” For fans, the script was perfect two icons, perhaps nearing their final stretch, finishing in style on Australian soil.
But beneath the emotional varnish lies a simple truth: this partnership, majestic as it looked, unfolded in a dead rubber and a match that was already over.
The real architects of India’s win at the Sydney Cricket Ground were the bowlers. It was they who strangled Australia for 236 on a placid pitch, exploiting discipline, variation and control.
The Context We Ignore
Narrative needs context. It’s easy to see why fans and broadcasters leaned into the sentiment. Rohit and Kohli, the twin pillars of Indian batting for over a decade, had struggled through the series. Kohli had two ducks in the previous matches; Rohit hadn’t crossed fifty. So when they finally clicked Rohit unbeaten on 121, Kohli on 74 the narrative wrote itself: redemption, legacy, closure.
This was a dead rubber a match played after Australia had already sealed the series 2-0. The intensity, both on the field and in the stands, was not that of a decider. It was, by cricketing convention, a footnote game, a chance for teams to experiment and for veterans to find form. To glorify a knock in such a setting is to inflate sentiment over substance and unfair to their own stellar careers.
The Bowlers’ Forgotten Brilliance
Compare the coverage. Television screens replayed Rohit’s lofted pull and Kohli’s straight drive in endless loops. Yet few headlines credited how India’s attack, on a flat Sydney pitch, bundled out Australia a sixty or seventy runs short of par.
On any fair day at the SCG, Australia should have been competitive but was instead undermined by disciplined bowling and a mid-innings collapse. It was Harshit Rana who led the charge, finishing with a match-defining 4-39, while India’s spinners and pace bowlers combined to dry up scoring and pick crucial wickets. Somehow, we prefer the image of Kohli’s raised bat to the stat sheet than showing Harshit Rana’s thumping fists.
By the time Rohit and Kohli took guard, the chase was more a procession than a problem.
A Familiar Pattern
Indian cricket has a long history of sentimental overreach. We love narratives of comebacks, reunions, poetic endings. When two giants of the modern era bat together, it becomes less about the match and more about mythology.
The “Ro-Ko” innings was no doubt graceful and efficient. But it didn’t demand genius; it demanded professionalism. There was no scoreboard pressure, no devilish pitch, no fiery opposition bowling. The chase that started 237 in 50 overs became 237 in 38. That’s not dominance; that’s inevitability.
This is not to diminish Rohit and Kohli. Their composure, shot selection and mutual understanding remain unmatched. Watching them bat together evokes a rare calm, a reminder of why they are modern greats. But journalism must separate
emotion from analysis.
The truth is, India’s bowlers created the platform. Rohit and
Kohli merely ensured there was no collapse. To treat their stand as an epic is to ignore the craft that came before it.
If anything, the Sydney game should be remembered as the day India’s bowlers delivered a masterclass.
The Sentiment Trap
Cricket, especially Indian cricket, often falls into the trap of nostalgia. We turn routine victories into moral triumphs and dead rubbers into defining moments.
But if the sport is to evolve, if storytelling around it is to mature, we must learn to balance awe with accuracy. Every great performance deserves applause, but not all of them deserve exaltation. The Sydney partnership was beautiful. It was also easy. The game was won long before Rohit and Kohli reached fifty. To elevate it to a saga of redemption is to misunderstand the anatomy of victory.
The unsung heroes were those who bowled hard lengths in the first innings, fielded sharply, and created the situation in which the “Ro-Ko” show could shine. They lit the fuse; the stars just watched the fireworks.
In the End
As the camera panned to Rohit and Kohli walking off arm-in-arm, it felt like a cinematic ending two veterans soaking in applause, aware that time is catching up. It was emotional, yes. But it wasn’t heroic.
India’s win in Sydney was a team triumph built from the ground up. The bowlers dug the foundation. By the time India began their chase, the hard work had been done. What followed was less a rescue act and more a a comfortable stroll for two modern greats on a sunny Sydney afternoon.
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.