Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
In its classical form, the Indian joint family brought multiple generations under one roof, bound by shared resources, responsibilities, and a collective identity. It was not merely a domestic arrangement but a sophisticated socio-economic institution. The joint family ensured the division of labour, efficient management of land and property, and the care of both the elderly and the young. In agrarian and craft-based societies, where livelihoods depended on shared labour and pooled knowledge, this model was both practical and desirable. Even today, India’s thriving family-owned businesses – large and small – reflect the same philosophy of collective work, shared risks, and interdependence.
Over the past century, however, the visible landscape of Indian families began changing. Several forces contributed to the displacement of the traditional joint household by nuclear units. Urbanisation and migration drew younger generations to cities in search of education and employment. Rising incomes and economic independence encouraged new aspirations. Modern education promoted individualism, career mobility, and personal choice. Changing gender roles led to shifts in household dynamics and decision-making.
As India’s economy expanded, particularly after liberalisation in the 1990s, lifestyles began transforming rapidly. Families moved from needs-based living to aspiration-led living. New consumer goods, private schooling, automobiles, travel, and lifestyle-oriented expenses became markers of progress. The economic logic that once favoured large joint households now leaned in favour of smaller nuclear families, where spending could be personalised, choices could be exercised freely, and financial decision-making could be more independent. Consumerism brought both opportunity and strain. While it expanded the choices available to individuals, it also placed pressure on traditional systems of shared resources, which required consensus and collective budgeting. Individual aspirations rarely align perfectly with collective priorities.
But does all this mean the joint family system in India has disappeared?
The belief that joint families are vanishing stems from the visible shifts in how families now live. However, this narrative oversimplifies a far more intricate social reality.
A closer look across regions and communities in India reveals a more nuanced picture. While the physical form and daily functioning of joint families have certainly evolved, the institution itself remains remarkably resilient. In many cases, what has changed is not the essence but the outward structure. The joint family may no longer always reside under a single roof, but its spirit manifests in multiple ways.
Families that appear nuclear on the surface often operate with joint-family characteristics; shared financial responsibilities, collective decision-making, and emotional interdependence across households. Parents may live separately from their married children but remain deeply integrated in matters of childcare, education, healthcare, and assets. Festivals, crises, major expenses, and property management are still navigated collectively. In cities, it is not uncommon to find siblings living in separate apartments in the same complex or locality, each maintaining independence, yet functioning as an extended joint unit when needed.
In rural areas, where land continues to be a binding asset, traditional joint families are still common, though adapted to changing economic pressures. Even in urban centres like Mumbai, Delhi, Ahmedabad, and Chennai, a significant number of households retain joint family arrangements, either physically or functionally. National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) data and census patterns consistently show that while nuclear families have grown, joint families still constitute a substantial share of Indian households. India never experienced the complete dissolution of extended families that occurred in some Western societies.
The transformation becomes easier to understand when viewed in the context of scale. The joint family flourished when it supported a few hundred million people. But it could not have remained static while supporting 1.4 billion Indians. Economic diversification, rising incomes, expanded opportunities, and increased consumerism all reshaped how families organised themselves. The need for flexibility, mobility, and personalised economic choices made it difficult for the old structure, with its implicit hierarchy and shared resources, to remain unchanged.
Yet, what is remarkable is not the decline of the joint family, but its ability to adapt without losing its essence. The core values lie mutual support, duty towards elders, shared responsibility, and emotional unity continue to hold strong across generations.
Today’s Indian joint family often exists in a distributed form:
- Members may not live under one roof, but remain connected through shared finances, caregiving, and decision-making.
- Technology enables constant communication, reducing the emotional distance that physical separation once created.
- Festivals, rituals, crises, and major life events still bring families together in ways uniquely Indian.
- Even among affluent urban households, the desire for intergenerational support and continuity remains strong.
The bottom line is simple, adaptation is not extinction. The joint family system did not disappear, it transformed itself to remain relevant in a changing India. The Indian joint family is not a relic of the past. It is a living institution, reshaped by time yet grounded in enduring values.
Col KL Viswanathan
(The author is an Indian Army veteran and a contemporary affairs commentator. The views are personal. He can be reached at kl.viswanathan@gmail.com )
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.