Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
As Ukraine’s reconstruction needs mount, pressure is building on Western nations to unlock the roughly $300 billion in frozen assets belonging to Russia’s central bank. While the moral imperative of holding the Kremlin accountable and aiding Kyiv is understandable, a growing number of economists and policymakers are warning that confiscating these funds represents a dangerous gamble with potentially devastating consequences for global economic security, the dollar’s standing in the world, and – crucially – the everyday finances of Indian investors and consumers connected to the international system. This isn’t simply about Russia; it’s about the bedrock of global finance.
The ‘Nuclear Option’ in finance: rewriting the rules on the fly
Confiscating sovereign assets is not merely another round of sanctions – it’s a dramatic escalation of economic warfare with far–reaching implications. Imagine changing the rules of cricket mid–match, during the World Cup final. This move fundamentally challenges the principle of sovereign immunity for central bank reserves, which is a cornerstone of international monetary stability. It’s not just about Russia; it’s about trust – the very foundation upon which the global financial system is built.
Countries like China (which holds billions in US Treasuries), India (a major holder of USD–denominated assets), Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and others are watching closely. Seeing Russia’s reserves potentially seized, they might well ask, ‘Could we be next if geopolitical tensions escalate?’ History shows that when trust in a reserve currency erodes, the consequences are severe. While the Bretton Woods system didn’t collapse overnight, this precedent could accelerate the fragmentation of the global monetary order, creating a more volatile and unpredictable landscape for all nations.
Dollar dominance: an economic advantage – for India too
The dollar’s status as the world’s primary reserve currency is not just a matter of American prestige; it is also a significant economic advantage for the United States. This enables Washington to borrow at lower interest rates (saving taxpayers billions annually), gives US businesses a competitive edge in global trade, and keeps import costs relatively low for American consumers. For India, this translates into cheaper access to vital imports such as oil, high–tech components and equipment, which are crucial for sustaining economic growth.
However, if major nations start accelerating the diversification of their reserves away from dollars and euros (into gold or yuan and other currencies), it could significantly weaken the dollar’s grip and exchange rate. A weaker dollar would mean:
- Higher import costs: everyday goods imported into India, priced in USD, become more expensive, contributing to inflationary pressure and squeezing household budgets. This is particularly concerning given India’s reliance on energy imports.
- Increased volatility in rupee–dollar exchange rate: a weakening dollar can lead to increased fluctuations in the INR/USD exchange rate, impacting Indian businesses involved in international trade and potentially increasing hedging costs.
- Potential impact on attracting foreign direct investment (FDI): a less stable dollar could deter FDI into India, as international investors seek more cost–efficient options. This would impact capital markets and economic growth.
Business fallout: retaliation & investor jitters
Western companies operating globally could face retaliation from Russia, which has explicitly threatened to seize their assets within its borders. More broadly, investors worldwide may become reluctant to invest in US, EU and other assets, fearing that they could be seized based on political decisions or shifting geopolitical winds. This could deter foreign direct investment in the West and make it harder for US companies to do business globally – impacting their ability to invest in emerging markets like India. Increased uncertainty surrounding international business would stifle global economic growth, including in India.
Immediate gain vs. long–term pain
Funding Ukraine’s reconstruction is a crucial objective. However, seizing Russian sovereign assets isn’t ‘free money’. The potential long–term cost to the dollar’s dominance and to the stability of the global financial system could far outweigh any immediate financial gain. This gamble could accelerate the fragmentation of the global monetary system and weaken America’s unique economic advantage, which India has strategically leveraged for decades.
Why not to explore alternative funding mechanisms? These might be a safer bet for long–term economic security and stability. With its growing economic influence and neutral stance on the Ukraine conflict, India could play a crucial role in advocating these alternatives.
Safeguarding the dollar’s standing is not just a matter of symbolism; it is about protecting jobs, consumer purchasing power and the foundation of global economic stability from which all nations, including India, benefit. As the saying goes, ‘If the foundation is weak, the house will crumble.‘ Seizing sovereign assets risks undermining the very foundation upon which an emerging multipolar economic order rests.
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.