Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
India’s ESG framework just crossed a critical threshold—and most Boards haven’t noticed. Union Budget 2026 allocated significant capex to waterways and energy transition, triggering market euphoria. The World Economic Forum’s Global Risks Report 2025 identified 7 of the top 10 long-term business risks as ESG-related. Even amid intensifying geopolitical tensions, the 2026 edition shows 5 of 10 risks still center on ESG—evidence these concerns aren’t temporary.
Here’s what mainstream media misses: ESG is no longer compliance theatre, nor mere storytelling under the now common Sustainability Reports. By 2026, Indian corporations face three converging realities separating ESG-credible organisations from merely ESG-compliant ones.
The Three Structural Breaks of 2025
First, ESG risks are now financial and legal risks—period. The Supreme Court’s environmental enforcement—including strict liability for industrial accidents and mandatory clearances—and SEBI’s assurance requirements have eliminated the buffer between ESG non-compliance and balance sheet impact. Climate extremes, water scarcity, and community conflicts manifest as pricier capital, operational shutdowns, regulatory penalties, and insurance constraints.
GermanWatch’s Climate Risk Index 2026 confirms India amongst countries most affected by climate change over the long term (1995-2024), with recurrent extreme weather events. Chennai’s 2019 ‘Day Zero’ crisis foreshadowed Bangalore’s 2025 acute shortage. Globally, extreme weather killed over 832,000 people and caused $4.5 trillion in losses from 1995-2024. Summer 2024 was the hottest on record—2 billion people experienced 30+ risky heat days. Water scarcity forced 14 of India’s 20 largest thermal utilities to shut down between 2013-2016, costing $1.4 billion. These weren’t climate models—they were quarterly earnings hits.
Second, disclosure convergence is breaking silos. India’s BRSR remains a compliance checklist—enforcement is realistically 5+ years away, per regulatory insiders. What matters is convergence with IFRS Sustainability Standards (ISSB). Indian firms with international investors or export markets face implicit ISSB benchmarking. The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is business reality for Indian exporters.
Third, market-driven ESG pressure is real but inconsistent. Large corporations demand supplier ESG verification in automotive, engineering, and chemicals. However, major buyers often compromise sustainability standards to maintain supply from strategic Indian vendors. Pressure exists but application depends on supplier leverage.
Three Questions Every Board Must Answer in 2026
Is ESG embedded in enterprise risk management? Organisations treating ESG as standalone sustainability functions demonstrate delayed risk recognition. The IMF’s Financial Stability Report shows ESG-material risks managed through Audit or Risk Committees correlate with earlier intervention. Do risk registers include climate variability, water stress, and social licence?
Are transition plans operationally credible? India’s heavy industry faces unique decarbonisation challenges: grid constraints, renewable intermittency, fuel access, policy uncertainty. Credible pathways must account for India’s realities, not replicate European templates.
Can you integrate nature and community risks into capital allocation? Beyond climate, nature-related risks—biodiversity loss, land-use conflict, ecosystem degradation—and community risks around social licence increasingly influence permitting timelines and operational continuity.
Sectoral Realities
ESG risks are sector-driven. Hard-to-abate industries face emissions intensity and asset lock-in. Manufacturing sectors experience supply-chain scrutiny. Even “green” sectors face land acquisition and biodiversity conflicts. Strategies cannot transfer across sectors—what works for data centres fails for steel manufacturing.
What ESG Credibility Requires by End-2026
ESG-credible Indian organisations will demonstrate three capabilities:
Strategy: Credible, industry-specific roadmaps tailored to business realities, not aspirational targets disconnected from operational capacity.
Data: Systems generating audit-grade ESG data with independent assurance, moving beyond BRSR’s current checklist approach.
Risk Integration: Integration of climate, water, nature, and community risks into capital allocation, operational planning, and Board oversight.
What’s Not Being Said
Mainstream coverage treats ESG as “nice-to-have” sustainability. That framing is dangerously outdated. ESG failures increasingly trigger material business consequences.
The central question isn’t whether Indian companies are ESG-compliant. It’s whether they’re institutionally prepared to withstand sustained scrutiny from communities, regulators, and markets; physical climate disruption; and capital market discipline.
That’s the inflection point most headlines are missing—and the conversation Boards need to have before 2026 closes.
References
World Economic Forum (2025). Global Risks Report 2025.
World Economic Forum (2026). Global Risks Report 2026.
GermanWatch (2025). Climate Risk Index 2026.
Down to Earth (2026). India’s Rs 20,000-Crore CCUS Push.
Deccan Herald (2025). Bengaluru Water Crisis Study.
World Resources Institute. India’s Thermal Power Plants in Water-Scarce Areas.
Supreme Court of India. Environmental Enforcement.
Securities and Exchange Board of India. BRSR Framework.
IFRS Foundation (2023). Sustainability Disclosure Standards.
European Commission. Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism.
International Monetary Fund (2023). Global Financial Stability Report.
Asian Development Bank (2023). Asian Water Development Outlook.
—
Pranav Sinha is the founder of ESGPace, an ESG consulting firm focused on governance integration and enterprise risk management. He has executed 1,500+ ESG assignments across 17 countries, advising 250+ multinationals over the last two decades. He specialises in designing ESG strategies and frameworks that allow organisations to derive tangible value from the resources and efforts invested on ESG.
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.