Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
Constitution Day, celebrated every 26th November, marks the historic occasion of 1949 when the Constituent Assembly adopted India’s supreme law. This day is more than just an annual celebration; it provides a crucial opportunity for national reflection, encouraging us to consider how closely our current social and political realities align with the revolutionary vision entrusted to us by its framers.
The Constitution of India is arguably the boldest blueprint for social engineering ever attempted through democratic consensus. The importance of this document, primarily expressed by the chairman of the Drafting Committee, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, lies in its transformative aim. It sought to dismantle centuries of entrenched hierarchy and structural inequality, establishing a foundation based on Justice, Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity. It is a sacred agreement between the State and the individual, explicitly designed to protect the citizen from arbitrary power and to establish a true democratic, egalitarian republic.
The Enduring Vision and Its Current Contradictions
The Preamble is not an introduction; it is a declaration of sovereign intent. The guarantees of Social, Economic, and Political Justice serve as the Constitution’s promissory notes to every Indian. However, in today’s India, where unprecedented economic growth exists alongside widening wealth disparities and persistent caste-based inequalities, the economic promise remains unfulfilled. Debates about affirmative action and reservation policies essentially question whether the state has truly honoured the Directive Principles of State Policy—the moral compass guiding socio-economic governance.
This is where the principle of Constitutional Morality becomes crucial. Ambedkar described it as the effective functioning of constitutional conventions and the common person’s belief that the actions taken by the legislature and the executive are just and reasonable. When political discourse favours expediency over established legal norms, it directly undermines the Constitution’s moral foundation, risking the shift towards majoritarianism.
The Contemporary Test: Three Critical Strains
The foundational covenant is currently under severe strain, demanding renewed vigilance from the judiciary, the political class, and the citizenry on three critical fronts: Fraternity, Liberty, and Federalism.
1. The Strain on Fraternity and Pluralism
The preamble’s promise of Fraternity faces its stiffest challenge from growing social polarisation driven by identity politics—religious, linguistic, and cultural. The Constitution designates India as a secular republic, demanding that the state maintain a principled distance from all faiths to strongly protect the rights and dignity of minorities and marginalised groups. The recent narrow definition of “Indianness” directly threatens this pluralistic ethos. Constitution Day calls us to reaffirm secularism as a practical reality, viewing diversity as a source of national strength rather than a fault line.
2. Erosion of Liberties in the Digital Age
The guarantees of Liberty of thought and expression (Article 19(1)(a)) are constantly tested in the age of rapid digitalisation and social media. The line between vigorous democratic dissent and hate speech is increasingly blurred. While the right to critique the government must remain sacrosanct, the proliferation of misinformation and lack of accountability threaten public discourse by allowing majoritarian sentiment to dominate. Additionally, the rising reliance on digital surveillance puts the constitutional Right to Privacy under significant strain. The judiciary must exercise extra caution to safeguard democratic dissent from excessive state surveillance and digital authoritarianism.
3. Tensions in the Federal Structure
India’s quasi-federal structure, designed to accommodate significant regional diversity, faces tension between the Union and State Governments. Disputes over resource allocation, the role of Governors, and legislative encroachments challenge the delicate balance of our Federal Structure. The Constitution envisioned cooperative federalism—a mechanism of give-and-take. Constitution Day must serve as a compelling reminder that confrontation, financial coercion, or unilateral decision-making that disregards regional diversity are antithetical to the spirit of the Constitution. The success of India is intrinsically linked to the health of its federal structure, which demands consultation and mutual respect for equitable development.
The Call for Constitutional Patriotism
The Constitution is a “living document” precisely because it requires the ongoing, deliberate effort of its inheritors to keep its principles relevant and active. We cannot afford complacency; democratic freedoms, once lost, are difficult to recover. The duty to uphold the Constitution does not rest solely with the three branches of government; it extends to us, ‘We the People’.
Celebrating Constitution Day means more than just reciting the Preamble; it involves practising Constitutional Patriotism. It encourages every citizen, public servant, and leader to measure their actions against the standards of constitutional morality—prioritising the Rule of Law over political convenience, democratic dissent over forced silence, and universal human dignity over narrow sectarian interests.
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.