Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
When I represented the opposition at the Late Dada Nirbhay Singh Patel Memorial Debate in August 2025 on “Railway Development: Symbol of National Progress,” I anchored my critique in granular research exposing data drowned out by performative budget speeches. Union Budget 2026-27 has transformed those debate points into a national imperative. As Parliament reconvenes for the Budget Session from March 9 to April 2 and takes up Railway Demand for Grants in the coming weeks, the railway priorities outlined in Budget 2026–27 deserve closer scrutiny. Capital expenditure of ₹2,78,030 crore impresses on paper. Seven high-speed corridors spanning Mumbai-Pune to Varanasi-Siliguri sound ambitious. But when Railway spends ₹98.40 of every ₹100 earned on operations, a fundamental question emerges: Are we constructing a skyscraper without reinforcing the foundation?
Safety Narrative: Statistical Semantics Over Human Tragedy
Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw claims consequential train accidents plummeted from 135 in 2014-15 to 12 in 2025-26. Commendable — but the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) reveals a starkly different picture: 27,987 railway accidents claimed 26,381 lives in 2019; in 2023, 24,678 accidents killed 21,803 people.
The discrepancy lies in definitional politics. The government counts only ‘consequential train accidents’—collisions, derailments, major fires. NCRB includes deaths from falling on tracks, trespassing, and unmanned level crossings. Does it matter to a grieving mother whether her son died in a ‘consequential’ or ‘non-consequential’ accident? Can Viksit Bharat 2047 be built on statistical semantics over human tragedy?
Railways in January 2026 set a record deploying Kavach across 472.3 km in one month — yet barely 2% of the 70,000 km network is protected. Complete coverage will require how many decades?
Financial Health: A Deepening Crisis
With a 98.40% operating ratio, just ₹1.60 of every ₹100 earned is available for investment. The pension burden alone stands at ₹71,500 crore — approximately 23.6% of total revenue. The Economic Survey 2025-26 reveals Railways’ freight market share collapsed from 86% in 1950-51 to 27-30% today, with the first three quarters of FY 2026 showing anaemic growth of 2.5%, 4.1%, and 3.2%. Politically sensitive passenger fares forced freight charges to subsidize passenger travel — driving customers to trucks, harming both the environment and logistics competitiveness.
Budget 2026-27’s most glaring contradiction is that the finance minister announced seven new high-speed corridors costing ₹16 lakh crore. Scrutiny of 300-plus budget pages reveals not a single rupee allocated for these corridors in FY 2026-27. This is a policy announcement, not a financial commitment.
Mumbai-Ahmedabad: A Cautionary Tale Half-Told
Prime Ministers Modi and Abe launched the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train in 2017 with a ₹1.08 lakh crore budget and an August 2023 deadline. Today, costs have escalated 83% to ₹1.98 lakh crore; despite spending ₹86,793 crore till March 2026, physical completion stands at merely 57%. If one project with 81% Japanese assistance proves this challenging, how realistic is announcing seven simultaneously? Following this trajectory, the ₹16 lakh crore estimate could balloon to ₹25-30 lakh crore.
Priorities: A Fundamental Question
Mumbai’s suburban trains witness passengers falling to deaths due to overcrowding. Thousands of unmanned level crossings claim hundreds of lives annually. Small cities lack basic connectivity. This is also a question of class equity. High-speed rail will serve the upper and upper-middle classes seeking air travel alternatives, while millions travelling daily in Mail, Express, and Passenger trains are left waiting. Should our priority be 300 kmph trains between metros, or basic safety everywhere?
The Way Forward: Ground-Level Reforms
The four-pillar framework I proposed at that debate has only grown more relevant today:
Accountability in Safety: Issue performance-based safety bonds. Establish an independent National Safety Verification Board. The ministry cannot be both the examiner and the examinee.
Financial Transparency: Create a Public Service Obligation Trust that explicitly shows passenger subsidies in budgets. Eliminate hidden freight subsidies. Monetize unused railway commercial land to raise ₹40,000-60,000 crore.
Green Transformation: Convert stations into solar micro-grids. Create Green Freight Credit Markets where road-to-rail shifters receive tradeable certificates.
Inclusive Growth: Build rail-linked economic clusters around 250-300 district headquarters. Guarantee minimum daily rail service for every aspirational district.
Policy or Pageantry?
Budget 2026-27 prioritizes headlines over implementation. Seven high-speed corridors worth ₹16 lakh crore with zero allocation. Mumbai-Ahmedabad project with 83% cost overrun, four-year delay, 57% completion, serves as a warning. A 98.40% operating ratio, 23.6% pension burden, freight share shrunk to 27%, and 21,803 annual deaths aren’t just numbers: they’re a story of failed priorities. Indian Railway needs fundamental reforms, not grand announcements. High-speed corridors are welcome, but only after we ensure that normal-speed trains are safe, Railways is financially healthy, and the capacity to complete at least one high-speed project is established.
Late Dada Nirbhay Singh Patel said public service comes from real work, not announcements. Railways need that principle today. The real question is: ₹16 lakh crore announced, zero allocated — is this Policy or Pageantry? My debate judge said, “Good opposition doesn’t just criticize, it offers alternatives.” I’ve tried. Now it’s the decision-makers’ turn.
________________________________________________________________________
Data sources: Union Budget 2026-27; Economic Survey 2025-26; NCRB- ADSI Report 2019 & 2023; Rajya Sabha – Unstarred Question No. 1699:(February 13, 2026); PIB Release – January 30, 2026; MoSPI Monthly Project Monitoring Flash Report: January 2026.
About the Author: – * Ekjot Kaur Khalsa is a Class 10 student at New Digamber Public School, Indore. She was the runner-up at the Late Dada Nirbhay Singh Patel Memorial Debate in August 2025 for her opposition stance on railway policy, and that research informs this article. Her article “Why Budget 2026 Must Put Pilot Safety First” was published in the Free Press Journal on January 31, 2026. She is also a published novelist and a 2025 Homi Bhabha Balvaidyanik Competition silver medallist.
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.