By James Oliphant and Gram Slattery
(Reuters) -U.S. Senator JD Vance, Republican Donald Trump’s pick as his vice presidential running mate, squared off against Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, who Democrat Kamala Harris tapped to be her No. 2, in a nationally televised debate on Tuesday.
The debate is likely the final one of the 2024 presidential campaign, potentially giving it some additional weight ahead of the Nov. 5 election.
Here are some takeaways from the event in New York:
BOB AND WEAVE AT THE OPENING BELL
The first question of the debate related to the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, asking both men if they would support a preemptive strike by Israel on Iran to disrupt the development of the latter’s nuclear program.
Neither candidate was eager to answer.
A visibly nervous Walz dodged the question, pivoting to a critique of Trump’s record during his four years in office.
“What’s fundamental here is that steady leadership is going to matter,” Walz said. “It’s clear, and the world saw it on that debate stage a few weeks ago, a nearly 80-year-old Donald Trump talking about crowd sizes is not what we need in this moment.”
Vance appeared to rib Walz for not addressing the question head on, but then segued into a description of his biography.
“My mother required food assistance for periods of her life,” said Vance, who grew up in a working-class Ohio household.
Vance did eventually circle back to the question, saying a second Trump administration would support Israel’s decision on the matter. But not before he offered an extended defense of Trump’s foreign policy, characterizing his time in office as extraordinarily peaceful.
In the opening exchange, at least, the candidates were less eager to dive into policy details than they were in litigating Trump’s legacy and introducing themselves to Americans.
THE ‘HARRIS ADMINISTRATION’
Joe Biden has been president of the U.S. for almost four years, but you would never have known that listening to Vance. And that was by design.
Early in the debate, Vance continually implied that Harris, as vice president, has been a primary decision maker in the White House on issues such as immigration and the war in Gaza. At one point, Vance referred to the “administration of Kamala Harris” and later he referred to when Harris “came into office.”
It’s a strategy the Trump campaign has long employed on the campaign trail — an attempt to make Harris inherit Biden’s political liabilities. In his debate with Harris, Trump largely failed to make that connection for viewers at home. But at rallies since then, he has repeatedly suggested that Harris has had more than three years to fix the nation’s problems.
Vance said something similar in a debate answer on the economy. “If Kamala Harris has such great plans for how to address middle class problems, then she ought to do them now,” he said.
It’s a tactic that has not completely borne fruit, however. Opinion polls have shown that voters largely don’t blame Harris for Biden’s economic and immigration policies, allowing her to cut into Trump’s advantages on those issues.
(Reporting by James Oliphant and Gram Slattery; Editing by Colleen Jenkins, Daniel Wallis and Deepa Babington)
Disclaimer: This report is auto generated from the Reuters news service. ThePrint holds no responsibilty for its content.