The Southeast Asian theatre is central to the Great Power contest between the US and China. It’s also a landscape where middle powers—France, the UK, Turkey—are shaping the strategic environment.
Mini deal will likely see no cut in 10% baseline tariff on Indian exports announced by Trump on 2 April, it is learnt, but additional 26% tariffs are set to be reduced.
Capable of being fired in plain and high-altitude areas, it has day-and-night capability and two-way data link to support post-launch target, aim-point update.
Public, loud, upfront, filled with impropriety and high praise sometimes laced with insults. This is what we call Trumplomacy. But the larger objective is the same: American supremacy.
Why has the author excluded any mention whatsoever of the lack of women heading mosques and churches? When will we have a lady Pope or a lady archbishop for India? What about oppressive Islamic customs like the burqa or triple Talaq? What about Catholic opposition to birth control measures? I do agree with the author that asking for ladies to be part of temple boards is a good idea, but why is there absolutely no mention of other religions? This is a lopsided article.
Arre bhaiya the article was written for temples but the author did said that the government needs to step up and provide reservation for women in all religious institutions. Also it is better that he didn’t said anything about other religions cause he doesn’t represent them. He being a hindu can only talk about his religion right? Instead of going through this victimhood complex it’s better to find progressive voices from all religions and amplify them. Rather than saying waha pe ye hota hai yahan pe ye hota hai.
World over diversity in religion is not allowed. In india Siya Rama or Umapati have become Jai Shri Ram or Har Har Mahadev. Male patriachy means women are meant to be indoors, under control with honour of family intact if woman are 4 steps behind male head of family. All the shane is only for woman with men being shameless.
Good point. This situation should change. Please also tell us how many women are involved in the administration of churches, mosques, waqfs, and huge church properties. Your argument should not be limited to Hindu institutions only.
Why has the author excluded any mention whatsoever of the lack of women heading mosques and churches? When will we have a lady Pope or a lady archbishop for India? What about oppressive Islamic customs like the burqa or triple Talaq? What about Catholic opposition to birth control measures? I do agree with the author that asking for ladies to be part of temple boards is a good idea, but why is there absolutely no mention of other religions? This is a lopsided article.
Arre bhaiya the article was written for temples but the author did said that the government needs to step up and provide reservation for women in all religious institutions. Also it is better that he didn’t said anything about other religions cause he doesn’t represent them. He being a hindu can only talk about his religion right? Instead of going through this victimhood complex it’s better to find progressive voices from all religions and amplify them. Rather than saying waha pe ye hota hai yahan pe ye hota hai.
World over diversity in religion is not allowed. In india Siya Rama or Umapati have become Jai Shri Ram or Har Har Mahadev. Male patriachy means women are meant to be indoors, under control with honour of family intact if woman are 4 steps behind male head of family. All the shane is only for woman with men being shameless.
Why no female Christian pope or female muslim maulana? Is sermonizing reserved to Hindus only?
Good point. This situation should change. Please also tell us how many women are involved in the administration of churches, mosques, waqfs, and huge church properties. Your argument should not be limited to Hindu institutions only.