The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 has done away with ‘waqf-by-user’ provision from law, but the Centre has told Supreme Court the amendments will be put on hold for now.
Concerns under scrutiny were drawn from a batch of nearly 100 petitions challenging the law, and revolve around significant changes to waqf governance and property recognition.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told bench that it would not be appropriate to consider a stay 'indirectly or directly based on prima facie or tentative reading of some sections'.
The high court also instructed both the Mamata government and the Centre to submit detailed reports on the situation. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on 17 April.
At a BJP workshop to answer party leaders’ queries, concerns over ‘practicing Islam’ clause were raised. There was no ‘satisfactory response’, but they were asked to focus on other positives.
When Parliament passed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, cries of 'Jai Modi' and 'Jai Amit Shah' broke out in Munambam. But the protesters say they won’t stop until the law is made retrospective.
Removing Section 40 of the 1995 Act and changing the long-standing 'once a waqf, always a waqf' rule could deepen the gap between Indian and Islamic Waqf systems.
Standing up to America is usually not a personal risk for a leader in India. Any suggestions of foreign pressure unites India behind who they see as leading them in that fight.
The concept of Waqf-by-user is an abomination. Only the Congress, under the leadership of Pandit Nehru, could have brought in such a law.
Independent India’s attempt to make Muslims feel part of the nation and develop a sense of belonging, involved such inherently unjust and legally unfounded acts of appeasement.
The concept of Waqf-by-user is an abomination. Only the Congress, under the leadership of Pandit Nehru, could have brought in such a law.
Independent India’s attempt to make Muslims feel part of the nation and develop a sense of belonging, involved such inherently unjust and legally unfounded acts of appeasement.