Today, Vaisakhi is celebrated with langar, processions, and fairs. But its real spirit lies in asking ourselves: Are we still brave enough to become Khalsa?
RJD, once a prominent representative of Mandal politics, now finds itself in a political era where welfare, good governance, and new aspirations are overshadowing old caste equations.
Without a Congress revival, there can be no challenge to the BJP pan-nationally. Modi’s party is growing, and almost entirely at the cost of the Congress.
Banal article written with chatgpt and full of brahmin hatred. He waxes eloquent about Khalsa panth without mentioning who exactly was Opressor and who were they fighting against. Truth wouldn’t suit his Leftist ,Hindu hating agenda. Hence Brahminical patriarchy.
Why do these people get representation in The Print is beyond reasoning. I mean if you assume The Print is a a reasonable publication.
What a pseudo narrative!! Sikism came about with first born boys from the farm lands. It also included Khatri and brahmin boys. It was a social movement to begin with. Mostly against Muslim aristocracy. So what spin are we trying to portray here…
I glanced through the article. Except for one paragraph, the subject header and content barely match. This is misleading. I also wonder how Sikh Dalits and ex-Sikh Dalits, now Christian, will react to the claims.
Is that so, Mr. Singh and Ms. Kaur?
For a change why don’t you rise up against Islamic radicalism? Or initiate a spiritual revolution against Islamic fundamentalism?
Don’t see the havoc caused across the world by Islamic Jihadi terrorism?
Banal article written with chatgpt and full of brahmin hatred. He waxes eloquent about Khalsa panth without mentioning who exactly was Opressor and who were they fighting against. Truth wouldn’t suit his Leftist ,Hindu hating agenda. Hence Brahminical patriarchy.
Why do these people get representation in The Print is beyond reasoning. I mean if you assume The Print is a a reasonable publication.
What a pseudo narrative!! Sikism came about with first born boys from the farm lands. It also included Khatri and brahmin boys. It was a social movement to begin with. Mostly against Muslim aristocracy. So what spin are we trying to portray here…
I glanced through the article. Except for one paragraph, the subject header and content barely match. This is misleading. I also wonder how Sikh Dalits and ex-Sikh Dalits, now Christian, will react to the claims.
Is that so, Mr. Singh and Ms. Kaur?
For a change why don’t you rise up against Islamic radicalism? Or initiate a spiritual revolution against Islamic fundamentalism?
Don’t see the havoc caused across the world by Islamic Jihadi terrorism?