The Indian judiciary is handling more than 30 million pending cases. As a result, administration of legal aid receives scant attention & is poorly managed.
Data shows that in some cases, new courts and transfer courts performed worse than courts which did not transfer cases to new courts to help with backlog.
In May 1974, RSS chief Madhukar Dattatraya Deoras spoke at a lecture series in Pune about caste-based discrimination and social equality within the Hindu fold.
SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
While the IAF remains committed to the Tejas programme and has placed orders for 180 Tejas Mk1A, the force is eagerly waiting for the Tejas Mk 2 version.
What Munir has achieved with Trump is a return to normal, ironing out the post-Abbottabad crease. The White House picture gives us insight into how Pakistan survives, occasionally thrives and thinks.
First of all entire legal system require overhaul.
Still we believe in British culture !!. Technology is not effectively used. Even gram Panchayat , Mandal can have The courts. Here, the judges can be revenue officer level class C level. Decorative staff is needed. All petty matters can be pushed here.
Coming to court , there are many staff they don’t have 8 hours job. Expenses can be reduced by introduction and utilisation of technology.
Law education should be technology driven. And 5 years or 3 years law it should be divided in 50% theory and 50% practical. The student should have practical experience in all areas 2 weeks each labour, taxation, revenue , civil, criminal , IPR, tribunals, corporate laws, family courts, international laws, documentation sub registrar office etc that is all facets. Trimister can be introduced. MLA judge, thahasildar salary may be equal. Hence more judges can be appointed if office expenses are less to reduce burden
Articles attempting to hold a mirror to what happens in grassroot levels are very relevant for
Policy makers since the delivery participants wouldn’t want to speak about their daily challenges, overburdened work is only an aspect of the problem. Good work author.
It’s time to redundant these authorities as first they told to establish these to improve legal support to needy now they said they were overburden , first they said more number of courts would diminish the case load now they said there is no adequate number of persons to man these,all after spending public funds in lakhs crores! How long they fool is?
This article is very timely. Crores and crores of rupees have been spent on legal services authorities, but very few people, especially the needy litigants, are hardly aware of the existence of these authorities. But then, abolition of these authorities , much as we desire, is only wishful thinking. No SC Judge will permit it because to abolish them will deprive him of the golden opportunity of doing Bharat Darshan free of cost. No Executive Chairperson or HC Chief Justice will endorse such suggestion for the simple reason that such abolition will diminish the chance to interact with SC Judges to further their their early elevation to SC Judges or Chief Justice of a HC .
This is a good article.. can you also do an article on how administration has improved after technology introduction? Please include as much statistics as possible
This article is a joke, judges enjoy tax payers money but no accountability for pending cases. They get more vacation than nursery students with untold benefits. Look at their benefits, emoluments, known and unknown income yo understand whether they are burdened or not. A person spends a lifetime waiting for judgements and not every common man can become a teesta setalvad getting bail on phone.
Article reflects a very shallow approach on the part of author while dealing with ‘legal aid system of India. Important aspects of the legal aid have been ignored and instead general and sweeping statements have been made. The legal aid system of India has developed in a very unified and robust manner because of the fact that judiciary is manning it. It seems that the author has not considered the various reforms and the activities being done and implemented by legal services Authorities which are making appreciable impact at the grassroots.
First of all entire legal system require overhaul.
Still we believe in British culture !!. Technology is not effectively used. Even gram Panchayat , Mandal can have The courts. Here, the judges can be revenue officer level class C level. Decorative staff is needed. All petty matters can be pushed here.
Coming to court , there are many staff they don’t have 8 hours job. Expenses can be reduced by introduction and utilisation of technology.
Law education should be technology driven. And 5 years or 3 years law it should be divided in 50% theory and 50% practical. The student should have practical experience in all areas 2 weeks each labour, taxation, revenue , civil, criminal , IPR, tribunals, corporate laws, family courts, international laws, documentation sub registrar office etc that is all facets. Trimister can be introduced. MLA judge, thahasildar salary may be equal. Hence more judges can be appointed if office expenses are less to reduce burden
Articles attempting to hold a mirror to what happens in grassroot levels are very relevant for
Policy makers since the delivery participants wouldn’t want to speak about their daily challenges, overburdened work is only an aspect of the problem. Good work author.
It’s time to redundant these authorities as first they told to establish these to improve legal support to needy now they said they were overburden , first they said more number of courts would diminish the case load now they said there is no adequate number of persons to man these,all after spending public funds in lakhs crores! How long they fool is?
This article is very timely. Crores and crores of rupees have been spent on legal services authorities, but very few people, especially the needy litigants, are hardly aware of the existence of these authorities. But then, abolition of these authorities , much as we desire, is only wishful thinking. No SC Judge will permit it because to abolish them will deprive him of the golden opportunity of doing Bharat Darshan free of cost. No Executive Chairperson or HC Chief Justice will endorse such suggestion for the simple reason that such abolition will diminish the chance to interact with SC Judges to further their their early elevation to SC Judges or Chief Justice of a HC .
This is a good article.. can you also do an article on how administration has improved after technology introduction? Please include as much statistics as possible
This article is a joke, judges enjoy tax payers money but no accountability for pending cases. They get more vacation than nursery students with untold benefits. Look at their benefits, emoluments, known and unknown income yo understand whether they are burdened or not. A person spends a lifetime waiting for judgements and not every common man can become a teesta setalvad getting bail on phone.
Article reflects a very shallow approach on the part of author while dealing with ‘legal aid system of India. Important aspects of the legal aid have been ignored and instead general and sweeping statements have been made. The legal aid system of India has developed in a very unified and robust manner because of the fact that judiciary is manning it. It seems that the author has not considered the various reforms and the activities being done and implemented by legal services Authorities which are making appreciable impact at the grassroots.