Reports on Allahabad High Court’s judgment in Salamat Ansari-Priyanka Kharwar case wrongly suggests a constitutional death-knell against UP’s 'love jihad' ordinance.
The HC ruled that two of its earlier verdicts, which said religious conversion solely for the purpose of a marriage was prohibited, do not lay down good law.
The court made the remark while dismissing a plea by a newly married couple, who had approached the court to direct police and the woman's father not to disturb their marital life.
Under the campaign, VHP workers will conduct door-to-door visits in tribal areas to educate people about Hindu religion. It also wants a law to halt conversion.
Webinars organised under Unnat Bharat Abhiyan meant for rural and tribal development have featured numerous speakers allegedly propounding the RSS line.
News channels were also in two minds about removing stray dogs to the government dog pounds. NDTV took credit for it and CNN-News 18 called ‘controversial order’.
Centre for Science and Environment in new report makes case for rationalising GST on waste material, saying most informal operators can’t afford high tax & it also hinders recycling.
21st edition of annual joint military exercise will be held from 1 to 16 September, aimed at sharing military tech, operational best practices & disaster relief coordination methods.
Standing up to America is usually not a personal risk for a leader in India. Any suggestions of foreign pressure unites India behind who they see as leading them in that fight.
I have a small clarification and a subsequent question which I intend to ask through this comment. The author quotes section 6 of the UP Anti conversion Bill 2019 which states that “Conversion for the sole purpose of marriage to be null and void”. I want to clarify here that if the law declares marriage void or the conversion void. The author in the next line states that the marriage is declared void through this section but I believe that the section merely declaring the conversion void.
Further, the author argues that this section(assuming it declares marriage void) cannot be held unconstitutional as it confirms with the dicta of Lily Thomas and Sarla Mudgal, but if we look at the wording of section 6 of the ordinance that has been recently passed then section 6 of that ordinance states that “marriage done for the sole purpose of conversion and vice versa to be void”, that is a considerable shift in position from the language used in the bill, so would the author’s argument still hold water vis-a-vis the present ordinance.
When the law itself is unconstitutional why the State government and police force is enforcing on victims? Look like Muslims have no Constitutional rights, any law and any action can be applied on them without any shame or fear. The SC should bring a “Sue O Moto’ bill against this illegal bill soon to save many victims.
Does one think these writers who are against Yogi are really against him.? No. They are paid writers as well as the PRINT media. These writers have loyalty to the money they get from whom so ever. These writers who support the love jihads should become victims of the islamic malaise to understand the gravity of the situation. Most of these writers have no loyalty to their religion or even the country where they live like parasites and they may feeling ashamed of their parents to have kept Hindu names and these anti Hindus are masquerading as liberals are the scourge of a decent society. For these writers it is fashionable to criticize Hindus but will hide under the cot if asked to do against islam and christian cults. This print media thinks people are still idiots and can be brainwashed to support their satanic views.They are wasting their time as to day social media are exposing their lies ,biased views and most important being anti national communist mentality
Liberal Left doesn’t care about hindus, They will deny all issues and concerns, like there was no Ra mtemple in Ayodhya, no hindu ever lived in kashmir valley, there is no conversion going on in the name of marriage. Don’t looks towards traditional media to highlight this, they are appeasers.
Does the author thinks abt grooming gangs of UK as laughable notion too…. has the author written how ” laughable” is sariah law. Has the author written about urgency of ucc???? Dont laugh at others pain for ur phd …… just as people die from dowry harrassment, women and men are dying becoz of loopholes in law….(politicians anyway take advantage of situation, scholars should do better than laughing…..)
Hindutvadi men fashion themselves as security guard for the private parts of their women folk. And in this they are not much different from their Muslim counterparts.
The ‘LJ’ thing is real.
I know only two cases very closely.
A couple more in the social periphery.
This may be inadequate data to extrapolate, but the matter in my ‘liberal’ mind is; ‘does it interfere with the choice displayed by women’.
The law was not made just on the observations of Allahabad High court. It has been made due to popular public demand to curb the practices of fradulent marriages.
It is this lot’s of children in a small house where parents cannot afford education or proper care let’s them to their own devices.
Many become vagabonds and extremely violent. A nuisance to society.
With nothing to do they focus on stealing vehicles and mobiles to impress girls and use fake identity for the same purpose as well.
INDIAN government must ensure strict population control measures and ensure modern scienctific education as well as respect for all religions is imbibed in all citizens.
No religious community must be allowed FREE hand in disturbing peace .
I have a small clarification and a subsequent question which I intend to ask through this comment. The author quotes section 6 of the UP Anti conversion Bill 2019 which states that “Conversion for the sole purpose of marriage to be null and void”. I want to clarify here that if the law declares marriage void or the conversion void. The author in the next line states that the marriage is declared void through this section but I believe that the section merely declaring the conversion void.
Further, the author argues that this section(assuming it declares marriage void) cannot be held unconstitutional as it confirms with the dicta of Lily Thomas and Sarla Mudgal, but if we look at the wording of section 6 of the ordinance that has been recently passed then section 6 of that ordinance states that “marriage done for the sole purpose of conversion and vice versa to be void”, that is a considerable shift in position from the language used in the bill, so would the author’s argument still hold water vis-a-vis the present ordinance.
When the law itself is unconstitutional why the State government and police force is enforcing on victims? Look like Muslims have no Constitutional rights, any law and any action can be applied on them without any shame or fear. The SC should bring a “Sue O Moto’ bill against this illegal bill soon to save many victims.
Does one think these writers who are against Yogi are really against him.? No. They are paid writers as well as the PRINT media. These writers have loyalty to the money they get from whom so ever. These writers who support the love jihads should become victims of the islamic malaise to understand the gravity of the situation. Most of these writers have no loyalty to their religion or even the country where they live like parasites and they may feeling ashamed of their parents to have kept Hindu names and these anti Hindus are masquerading as liberals are the scourge of a decent society. For these writers it is fashionable to criticize Hindus but will hide under the cot if asked to do against islam and christian cults. This print media thinks people are still idiots and can be brainwashed to support their satanic views.They are wasting their time as to day social media are exposing their lies ,biased views and most important being anti national communist mentality
‘No religious community must be allowed FREE hand in disturbing peace .’
Will you be banning the RSS ?
Liberal Left doesn’t care about hindus, They will deny all issues and concerns, like there was no Ra mtemple in Ayodhya, no hindu ever lived in kashmir valley, there is no conversion going on in the name of marriage. Don’t looks towards traditional media to highlight this, they are appeasers.
Does the author thinks abt grooming gangs of UK as laughable notion too…. has the author written how ” laughable” is sariah law. Has the author written about urgency of ucc???? Dont laugh at others pain for ur phd …… just as people die from dowry harrassment, women and men are dying becoz of loopholes in law….(politicians anyway take advantage of situation, scholars should do better than laughing…..)
Hindutvadi men fashion themselves as security guard for the private parts of their women folk. And in this they are not much different from their Muslim counterparts.
The ‘LJ’ thing is real.
I know only two cases very closely.
A couple more in the social periphery.
This may be inadequate data to extrapolate, but the matter in my ‘liberal’ mind is; ‘does it interfere with the choice displayed by women’.
The law was not made just on the observations of Allahabad High court. It has been made due to popular public demand to curb the practices of fradulent marriages.
INDIA must focus on reducing POPULATION.
It is this lot’s of children in a small house where parents cannot afford education or proper care let’s them to their own devices.
Many become vagabonds and extremely violent. A nuisance to society.
With nothing to do they focus on stealing vehicles and mobiles to impress girls and use fake identity for the same purpose as well.
INDIAN government must ensure strict population control measures and ensure modern scienctific education as well as respect for all religions is imbibed in all citizens.
No religious community must be allowed FREE hand in disturbing peace .