For all its obvious blemishes, capitalism alone holds out the most creative and dynamic force that any civilization has ever discovered, wrote BP Godrej in 1980.
SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
This is the first major attack on central security forces since last November, when a CRPF jawan was killed and four were injured in an ambush in Jiribam on Manipur-Assam border.
Many really smart people now share the position that playing cricket with Pakistan is politically, strategically and morally wrong. It is just a poor appreciation of competitive sport.
The opposition always attack on lalu for corruption by making lots of false rumors which he had not done in that scale every political party make money …but the upper caste media never shouts on other like nitish and sushil modil lots of other leaders but on lalu they shouts by knowing incomplete information..shame on indian media and investmenting agency of India
You have shown one side of coin, just flip the coin and see Lalu has image of corrupt, scandalous politician. He has wasted 15 years of his tenure and pushed Bihar 50 years back. Look at his family, his daughter got gold medal in medical and what she is doing, all in disproportionate assets case. Shameful
The thought underlying democracy being that – No thought is so heinous that it does not deserve to be heard once. Now having heard the thought it must be mulled upon with a unprejudiced mind.
In that context everyone who is rejecting the article upfront is incapable of the said democratic exercise and needs to rethink because some lies are so tempting that we end up as victims of make believe game……
The writer has just put forward an explanation to a phenomenon which is a reality and no one can deny it. One’s interest may make him to believe otherwise but definitely lalu prasad yadav has most persistently charismatic political career we have seen in recent times.
In 1990 to 2000, most of the states including tamilnadu by jayalalitha n Karunanidhi are in poverty, corruption , unemployment etc. Lalu is not arrogance as like JJ, mayawathi, Mamatha Banerjee. In India all states are caste based politics only. Also who has not done corruption in India after 90’s? As a nutshell, Lalu initiated revolution for backward people in India and controlled riots in Bihar whereas caste based riots was more in Tamil nadu at the time. Still no industry, IT company coming forward to Bihar though Buhari’s ready to work with low salary n more time. It is bcz of mindset of owners and CEOs of the company and region connectivity of the state. In his 15 yrs tenure, Lalu was tried to become good teacher among poor govt school students compared to talented rich private school students. Overall Lalu is better than JJ, Karunanidhi, nitish , Maya etc based on his principles followers in life.
Written is seems to be a paid journalist working as PR of lalu yadav..yes lalu was revolutionary but revolutionary of what ?? He brought revolution in kidnapping industry, he brought revolution in looting the public money, ruined the education system, divided bihar in fragments of caste , and still he got votes of particular caste..and that caste ll remain underdeveloped till they stop voting lalu the killer of many innocents for ransom and kidnapping.
For a South Indian (which is dominated population-wise by shudras), and for someone who has studied and taught many North Indian students from various states and had many debates with them, this article appears to be very biased.
The journalist does not seem to understand human psychology. Committing criminal acts per se requires boldness. It is called Sociopathy when you do not feel any guilt for your actions and can lie your way through anything whether it is needed or not. Arresting Advani was part of that boldness and part political mileage.
I do not understand why the author is fixated on communalism under Lalu while forgetting the corruption, extortion & kidnapping industries he has developed. These are the only industries he has developed.
For the kind author’s information, he can go check the Patna Medical College records of a DR. MISA (Lalu’s daughter) who apparently failed in all university exams but somehow go the the university gold medal in her final exams.
Journalism is supposed to be unbiased sir. Your article is plain bullshit whose colour is very obvious.
It is like ridiculing Bihar and being unfair to thousands of innocents who either perished or were forced to migrate to other states forever due to utter lawlessness and rampant misgovernance in Bihar….perhaps the only state where calls from CM residence were directly made to even thanas to release caste specific murder accused immediately!
The righter while being blindly prejudiced has made a mockery of journalism and perhaps he forgot to mention that this is a paid advertisement!
Offcourse, Bihar was the best performing state in India after independence under Shri Babu (SK Singh) and his illustrious deputy Anugrah Babu (Dr. AN Sinha).Both were outstanding administrators and intellectual thinkers by any standards..
Even till the time of Lalu Ji’s CMship, Bihar continued to be somewhat an ‘average’ state performing normally before all hell broke loose and development nosedived and governance passed away in Bihar….
The testimony is poverty which jumped from a mere a whopping 44 percent under leader of ‘poor’ Lalu Ji and Complete closure of many important factories, establishments and virtual rot of government machinery…It is also interesting to point out that Lalu Ji’s wealth increase a million times during this period.
By the way how was Bihar ‘governed’ when an illiterate spouse was forcefully hoisted as CM?
The journalist has chosen to gloss over certain impotant points to justify the 15 years rule of Lalu Yadav.
Firstly,Other than Shree Krishna Singh, no other Chief Minister got such an extended run as Chief Minister as Lalu-Rabri.Many of the Congress CMs mentioned were just stop -gap arrangements.Besides,after Lalu took over as Chief Minister,economic liberalisation was set in motion and the GDP of many states galloped.Lalu had a bias against developement as he had a firm conviction that fruits of developement go only to upper caste people.So,Bihar which was anyway not a developed state at the start of his rule further descended deep in economic backwardness.The economic disparity between between Bihar and other states accentuated further.
The main reason behind the unprecedented growth curve of Lalu was that he could exploit the pent up frustration and anger of intermediate caste against the upper caste.He kind of symbolized the rising aspiration of the the lower caste which wanted the levers of power in post Mandal era.His rustic but confident mannerisms, organisational ability, witty articulation made him the hero that the lower caste had always aspired for.He literally decimated the Congress party in Bihar as it was seen as a party where power rests with the upper caste .It had to happen as numerically upper caste were no match for intermediate and lower castes.Once Congress was marginalised and Lalu got embroiled in corruption cases his popularity graph came down.Nitish Kumar,the other backward caste leader was everyting that Lalu was not.Nitish was articulate,development oriented and had a vision.Very soon the cloak of invincibility came off Lalu and he was ousted of power.
Lalu was on a terminal downhill journey until Nitish gave him a lifeline by snapping his ties with BJP.He still hold sway among Yadavs and Muslims.But going will be tough for him in 2019.
Don’t know what the author is trying to achieve with this article. Projecting Lalu as hero is a shameful act, the author is only telling the stories from which he can change his image. why dont you tell his crimes, corruptions, murder stories and let the readers be the judge weather he is victim or culprit. None of the above written can justify the bads which he has done to the state. Lalu chor tha chor hai aur rahega.
Good one. Keep writing these articles. This we knew that he is not only responsible for Bihar. There are other factors also for the deterioration of Bihar. And I know that those who are not getting reservation are against the same.
Bihar has developed a lot under Nitish. Lalu should have advised his Son properly when he was Dy. CM. His son could not establish a good equation with Nitish possibly because he may have a bit of arrogance like his father in his DNA.
Deepak Mandal, The writer of this Article, i feel like that you were not in Bihar when Lalu ruled for 15 years or else u wont have find words to appreciate him. Sir, many of things in your write up are true that Bihar was underdeveloped before Lalu also and is still in the bottom. You are very right that he gave strength to the down trodden and did not let riots happen in Bihar in his 15 years rule. But at the same time, in Lalu’s 15 years Bihar became a dreaded land where even people from other states of India stopped visiting. In Lalu’s era, It became necessary for parents to send their children outside Bihar for education or else once Patna University was a name to recon with. Bihari became a thing of Mockery because the Leader of Bihar Lalu behaved like a Joker everywhere. Greatness would have been in Lalu if after giving social strength to the down trodden Lalu would also had strengthened economically to this class. Lalu’s Wealth increased like a Zamindar and the people became more poor in Bihar. I dont say that Nitish Kumar’s rule is great but at least we have some good roads ( Travel time from Patna to my village 100 Kms, has reduced from 7 hours to 3 hours), we have good electricity ( More than 20 hours in Patna and also more than 15 hours in my village out of 24 hours ) and up of all a sense of security. Nitish definitely failed in Industrialization / Generating Jobs / Stopping Migration / Stopping Corruption / Improving Education, but at least he is taken seriously and is not a reason of making Biharis a thing of Mockery.
A senior journalist who wrote this article didn’t even mentioned that till the 3rd 5 year plan, the state Bihar was developing on higestest growth rate in compare to the current developed states with high industrialization being done there like the Tisco, Sindri, Bokaro, Dalmia Nagar, Barauni came and was developing the region. Most of the prominent Institute also opened that time only like BIT Mesra, Sindri, XISS, XLRI etc. That time the CM which the author mentioned was Sri Krishna Singh who was a progressive person and called Father of Modern Bihar, and this Irony that he is today compared with a the theif and lootera Lalu
The development got slow after 1965-67 when these scocialists started gaining power.
Do your homework before writting any thing crap.
Very aptly said Mandal ji. While disallowing him to avail required medical facilities his opponents have shown their feudal mindset. Humanity shld be above political battle.Nobody has right to play with the life of anybody irrespective of political affiliation.Be human first.
The writer Dilip Mandal seems to be very biased. He presents Lalu as a victim and goes on eulogising him. No where he mentions that he looted treasury and is a corrupt person.
According to him Lalu is an achiever as a chief minister. My foot.
What can you expect from such a writer whose family members seem to be the beneficiaries of Lalu’s lopsided policies.
Abe Deepak Mandal AA Bihar mein dekh AA ke dekh… underdeveloped??? Bahar se commentary mat kar aa kar dekh…..a prominently developing state….tumhare jaise hi jhaantu journalist stereotype karke reputation kharab karte hain
The opposition always attack on lalu for corruption by making lots of false rumors which he had not done in that scale every political party make money …but the upper caste media never shouts on other like nitish and sushil modil lots of other leaders but on lalu they shouts by knowing incomplete information..shame on indian media and investmenting agency of India
You have shown one side of coin, just flip the coin and see Lalu has image of corrupt, scandalous politician. He has wasted 15 years of his tenure and pushed Bihar 50 years back. Look at his family, his daughter got gold medal in medical and what she is doing, all in disproportionate assets case. Shameful
What the journalist wrote is 100% right. Aaj lalu ji ki hi then hai ki dalit and backward seena taan ke bolte hai…….
Looting the country and its resources is okay for a rustic and low caste person? Which formula of ethics? Misguided anger?
The thought underlying democracy being that – No thought is so heinous that it does not deserve to be heard once. Now having heard the thought it must be mulled upon with a unprejudiced mind.
In that context everyone who is rejecting the article upfront is incapable of the said democratic exercise and needs to rethink because some lies are so tempting that we end up as victims of make believe game……
The writer has just put forward an explanation to a phenomenon which is a reality and no one can deny it. One’s interest may make him to believe otherwise but definitely lalu prasad yadav has most persistently charismatic political career we have seen in recent times.
In 1990 to 2000, most of the states including tamilnadu by jayalalitha n Karunanidhi are in poverty, corruption , unemployment etc. Lalu is not arrogance as like JJ, mayawathi, Mamatha Banerjee. In India all states are caste based politics only. Also who has not done corruption in India after 90’s? As a nutshell, Lalu initiated revolution for backward people in India and controlled riots in Bihar whereas caste based riots was more in Tamil nadu at the time. Still no industry, IT company coming forward to Bihar though Buhari’s ready to work with low salary n more time. It is bcz of mindset of owners and CEOs of the company and region connectivity of the state. In his 15 yrs tenure, Lalu was tried to become good teacher among poor govt school students compared to talented rich private school students. Overall Lalu is better than JJ, Karunanidhi, nitish , Maya etc based on his principles followers in life.
Misleading article from paid journalist.
We should have stopped him before writing such bullshit article and misleading the reader.
Lalu is a really a great politician
Written is seems to be a paid journalist working as PR of lalu yadav..yes lalu was revolutionary but revolutionary of what ?? He brought revolution in kidnapping industry, he brought revolution in looting the public money, ruined the education system, divided bihar in fragments of caste , and still he got votes of particular caste..and that caste ll remain underdeveloped till they stop voting lalu the killer of many innocents for ransom and kidnapping.
For a South Indian (which is dominated population-wise by shudras), and for someone who has studied and taught many North Indian students from various states and had many debates with them, this article appears to be very biased.
The journalist does not seem to understand human psychology. Committing criminal acts per se requires boldness. It is called Sociopathy when you do not feel any guilt for your actions and can lie your way through anything whether it is needed or not. Arresting Advani was part of that boldness and part political mileage.
I do not understand why the author is fixated on communalism under Lalu while forgetting the corruption, extortion & kidnapping industries he has developed. These are the only industries he has developed.
For the kind author’s information, he can go check the Patna Medical College records of a DR. MISA (Lalu’s daughter) who apparently failed in all university exams but somehow go the the university gold medal in her final exams.
Journalism is supposed to be unbiased sir. Your article is plain bullshit whose colour is very obvious.
Absolutely insane!
It is like ridiculing Bihar and being unfair to thousands of innocents who either perished or were forced to migrate to other states forever due to utter lawlessness and rampant misgovernance in Bihar….perhaps the only state where calls from CM residence were directly made to even thanas to release caste specific murder accused immediately!
The righter while being blindly prejudiced has made a mockery of journalism and perhaps he forgot to mention that this is a paid advertisement!
Offcourse, Bihar was the best performing state in India after independence under Shri Babu (SK Singh) and his illustrious deputy Anugrah Babu (Dr. AN Sinha).Both were outstanding administrators and intellectual thinkers by any standards..
Even till the time of Lalu Ji’s CMship, Bihar continued to be somewhat an ‘average’ state performing normally before all hell broke loose and development nosedived and governance passed away in Bihar….
The testimony is poverty which jumped from a mere a whopping 44 percent under leader of ‘poor’ Lalu Ji and Complete closure of many important factories, establishments and virtual rot of government machinery…It is also interesting to point out that Lalu Ji’s wealth increase a million times during this period.
By the way how was Bihar ‘governed’ when an illiterate spouse was forcefully hoisted as CM?
The journalist has chosen to gloss over certain impotant points to justify the 15 years rule of Lalu Yadav.
Firstly,Other than Shree Krishna Singh, no other Chief Minister got such an extended run as Chief Minister as Lalu-Rabri.Many of the Congress CMs mentioned were just stop -gap arrangements.Besides,after Lalu took over as Chief Minister,economic liberalisation was set in motion and the GDP of many states galloped.Lalu had a bias against developement as he had a firm conviction that fruits of developement go only to upper caste people.So,Bihar which was anyway not a developed state at the start of his rule further descended deep in economic backwardness.The economic disparity between between Bihar and other states accentuated further.
The main reason behind the unprecedented growth curve of Lalu was that he could exploit the pent up frustration and anger of intermediate caste against the upper caste.He kind of symbolized the rising aspiration of the the lower caste which wanted the levers of power in post Mandal era.His rustic but confident mannerisms, organisational ability, witty articulation made him the hero that the lower caste had always aspired for.He literally decimated the Congress party in Bihar as it was seen as a party where power rests with the upper caste .It had to happen as numerically upper caste were no match for intermediate and lower castes.Once Congress was marginalised and Lalu got embroiled in corruption cases his popularity graph came down.Nitish Kumar,the other backward caste leader was everyting that Lalu was not.Nitish was articulate,development oriented and had a vision.Very soon the cloak of invincibility came off Lalu and he was ousted of power.
Lalu was on a terminal downhill journey until Nitish gave him a lifeline by snapping his ties with BJP.He still hold sway among Yadavs and Muslims.But going will be tough for him in 2019.
Don’t know what the author is trying to achieve with this article. Projecting Lalu as hero is a shameful act, the author is only telling the stories from which he can change his image. why dont you tell his crimes, corruptions, murder stories and let the readers be the judge weather he is victim or culprit. None of the above written can justify the bads which he has done to the state. Lalu chor tha chor hai aur rahega.
Shree laloo yadav is the great leader.No doubts.I appriciate the views of journlist
Good one. Keep writing these articles. This we knew that he is not only responsible for Bihar. There are other factors also for the deterioration of Bihar. And I know that those who are not getting reservation are against the same.
The writer is simply an idiot with no grey matter.
Bihar has developed a lot under Nitish. Lalu should have advised his Son properly when he was Dy. CM. His son could not establish a good equation with Nitish possibly because he may have a bit of arrogance like his father in his DNA.
Most corrupt, a buffoon surviving on his buffoonery,and above all a disgusting so called leader.
Deepak Mandal, The writer of this Article, i feel like that you were not in Bihar when Lalu ruled for 15 years or else u wont have find words to appreciate him. Sir, many of things in your write up are true that Bihar was underdeveloped before Lalu also and is still in the bottom. You are very right that he gave strength to the down trodden and did not let riots happen in Bihar in his 15 years rule. But at the same time, in Lalu’s 15 years Bihar became a dreaded land where even people from other states of India stopped visiting. In Lalu’s era, It became necessary for parents to send their children outside Bihar for education or else once Patna University was a name to recon with. Bihari became a thing of Mockery because the Leader of Bihar Lalu behaved like a Joker everywhere. Greatness would have been in Lalu if after giving social strength to the down trodden Lalu would also had strengthened economically to this class. Lalu’s Wealth increased like a Zamindar and the people became more poor in Bihar. I dont say that Nitish Kumar’s rule is great but at least we have some good roads ( Travel time from Patna to my village 100 Kms, has reduced from 7 hours to 3 hours), we have good electricity ( More than 20 hours in Patna and also more than 15 hours in my village out of 24 hours ) and up of all a sense of security. Nitish definitely failed in Industrialization / Generating Jobs / Stopping Migration / Stopping Corruption / Improving Education, but at least he is taken seriously and is not a reason of making Biharis a thing of Mockery.
A senior journalist who wrote this article didn’t even mentioned that till the 3rd 5 year plan, the state Bihar was developing on higestest growth rate in compare to the current developed states with high industrialization being done there like the Tisco, Sindri, Bokaro, Dalmia Nagar, Barauni came and was developing the region. Most of the prominent Institute also opened that time only like BIT Mesra, Sindri, XISS, XLRI etc. That time the CM which the author mentioned was Sri Krishna Singh who was a progressive person and called Father of Modern Bihar, and this Irony that he is today compared with a the theif and lootera Lalu
The development got slow after 1965-67 when these scocialists started gaining power.
Do your homework before writting any thing crap.
Very aptly said Mandal ji. While disallowing him to avail required medical facilities his opponents have shown their feudal mindset. Humanity shld be above political battle.Nobody has right to play with the life of anybody irrespective of political affiliation.Be human first.
Worst article.nobody is afraid of laloo.he is only important in bihar.
The writer Dilip Mandal seems to be very biased. He presents Lalu as a victim and goes on eulogising him. No where he mentions that he looted treasury and is a corrupt person.
According to him Lalu is an achiever as a chief minister. My foot.
What can you expect from such a writer whose family members seem to be the beneficiaries of Lalu’s lopsided policies.
Yeh writer asli jhaantu hai
Abe Deepak Mandal AA Bihar mein dekh AA ke dekh… underdeveloped??? Bahar se commentary mat kar aa kar dekh…..a prominently developing state….tumhare jaise hi jhaantu journalist stereotype karke reputation kharab karte hain
Till date not any article found that detailed details about truth behind Lalu’s political domination.
All follow similar ideology of freebies subsidies reservation socialism which will not lead to development.
Right
Lalu a PM material. Lost the seat for his arrogance. When offered PM seat he told BBC Lalu maketh a king not a king himself.
A man who stole millions of rupes is not worth a mention. I am glad the law eventually caught up with him.
Its not the Law but a trap . India judistriction will be shameful in coming time.
Agree