BJP youth wing leader Priyanka Sharma was arrested for allegedly superimposing a picture of West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee on to one of Priyanka Chopra’s Met Gala photo.
The Supreme Court observed that since Priyanka Sharma is a member of a political party (BJP), the insinuation of posting such a picture is different from those shared by common people.
Imposition of formal rights and digital compliance mechanisms introduces new expectations for both employers and workers. This transition will require sustained awareness efforts.
While global corporations setting up GCCs in India continue to express confidence in availability of skilled AI engineers, the panel argued that India’s real challenge lies elsewhere.
Speaking to ThePrint, Salman Akram urges dignity in tragedy, recalling the loss of his brother, Wing Commander Nauman Akram, in similar crash & the mockery his family faced after.
It is a brilliant, reasonably priced, and mostly homemade aircraft with a stellar safety record; only two crashes in 24 years since its first flight. But its crash is a moment of introspection.
Section 66 A of the IT Act was struck down by the apex court in 2015. It has been invoked in the present case. This should be grounds to move against the errant policemen in suo moto contempt. As the apex court may be pleased to do when sedition charges are applied in contravention of guidelines framed by it in 1962.
Seldom has the ordinary citizen appeared so puny and inconsequential before the might of the state. It is for the apex court to not only grant relief in respect of cases such as Shri Prashant Kanojia’s which are before it but to issue binding directions in the operative part of the order – not mere obiter dicta – that will deter police forces all over the country from treating a citizen’s liberty as something wholly dependent on their benevolence and magnanimity.
Prashant Kishore,rabish Kumar,prashoon pandey etc they are to banned or should be declared as traitor and must be punished with life time prisonment
Section 66 A of the IT Act was struck down by the apex court in 2015. It has been invoked in the present case. This should be grounds to move against the errant policemen in suo moto contempt. As the apex court may be pleased to do when sedition charges are applied in contravention of guidelines framed by it in 1962.
Seldom has the ordinary citizen appeared so puny and inconsequential before the might of the state. It is for the apex court to not only grant relief in respect of cases such as Shri Prashant Kanojia’s which are before it but to issue binding directions in the operative part of the order – not mere obiter dicta – that will deter police forces all over the country from treating a citizen’s liberty as something wholly dependent on their benevolence and magnanimity.