BJP youth wing leader Priyanka Sharma was arrested for allegedly superimposing a picture of West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee on to one of Priyanka Chopra’s Met Gala photo.
The Supreme Court observed that since Priyanka Sharma is a member of a political party (BJP), the insinuation of posting such a picture is different from those shared by common people.
Disenfranchisement by institutional fiat is profoundly undemocratic. The effect of the ECI's new documentary process in Bihar will tilt the scales in favour of the BJP.
Mini deal will likely see no cut in 10% baseline tariff on Indian exports announced by Trump on 2 April, it is learnt, but additional 26% tariffs are set to be reduced.
India-Russia JV is also racing to deliver 7,000 more AK-203 assault rifles by 15 Aug. These are currently being made with 50% indigenisation and this will surge to 100% by 31 December.
Public, loud, upfront, filled with impropriety and high praise sometimes laced with insults. This is what we call Trumplomacy. But the larger objective is the same: American supremacy.
Section 66 A of the IT Act was struck down by the apex court in 2015. It has been invoked in the present case. This should be grounds to move against the errant policemen in suo moto contempt. As the apex court may be pleased to do when sedition charges are applied in contravention of guidelines framed by it in 1962.
Seldom has the ordinary citizen appeared so puny and inconsequential before the might of the state. It is for the apex court to not only grant relief in respect of cases such as Shri Prashant Kanojia’s which are before it but to issue binding directions in the operative part of the order – not mere obiter dicta – that will deter police forces all over the country from treating a citizen’s liberty as something wholly dependent on their benevolence and magnanimity.
Prashant Kishore,rabish Kumar,prashoon pandey etc they are to banned or should be declared as traitor and must be punished with life time prisonment
Section 66 A of the IT Act was struck down by the apex court in 2015. It has been invoked in the present case. This should be grounds to move against the errant policemen in suo moto contempt. As the apex court may be pleased to do when sedition charges are applied in contravention of guidelines framed by it in 1962.
Seldom has the ordinary citizen appeared so puny and inconsequential before the might of the state. It is for the apex court to not only grant relief in respect of cases such as Shri Prashant Kanojia’s which are before it but to issue binding directions in the operative part of the order – not mere obiter dicta – that will deter police forces all over the country from treating a citizen’s liberty as something wholly dependent on their benevolence and magnanimity.