BJP youth wing leader Priyanka Sharma was arrested for allegedly superimposing a picture of West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee on to one of Priyanka Chopra’s Met Gala photo.
The Supreme Court observed that since Priyanka Sharma is a member of a political party (BJP), the insinuation of posting such a picture is different from those shared by common people.
China has not specifically protested about the revival of advanced landing grounds. However, given the historical and tactical significance of Chushul, it may make an exception.
Naidu attempts to shield aqua farmers after Trump’s tariff hits the shrimp farming sector in Andhra Pradesh, leading to the cancellation of 50% of the state's exports.
Company builds microsatellites that are smaller, faster, cheaper to produce. ICEYE will develop & launch micro-satellites, hand them over to India, which will have full control & sovereignty.
What Munir has achieved with Trump is a return to normal, ironing out the post-Abbottabad crease. The White House picture gives us insight into how Pakistan survives, occasionally thrives and thinks.
Section 66 A of the IT Act was struck down by the apex court in 2015. It has been invoked in the present case. This should be grounds to move against the errant policemen in suo moto contempt. As the apex court may be pleased to do when sedition charges are applied in contravention of guidelines framed by it in 1962.
Seldom has the ordinary citizen appeared so puny and inconsequential before the might of the state. It is for the apex court to not only grant relief in respect of cases such as Shri Prashant Kanojia’s which are before it but to issue binding directions in the operative part of the order – not mere obiter dicta – that will deter police forces all over the country from treating a citizen’s liberty as something wholly dependent on their benevolence and magnanimity.
Prashant Kishore,rabish Kumar,prashoon pandey etc they are to banned or should be declared as traitor and must be punished with life time prisonment
Section 66 A of the IT Act was struck down by the apex court in 2015. It has been invoked in the present case. This should be grounds to move against the errant policemen in suo moto contempt. As the apex court may be pleased to do when sedition charges are applied in contravention of guidelines framed by it in 1962.
Seldom has the ordinary citizen appeared so puny and inconsequential before the might of the state. It is for the apex court to not only grant relief in respect of cases such as Shri Prashant Kanojia’s which are before it but to issue binding directions in the operative part of the order – not mere obiter dicta – that will deter police forces all over the country from treating a citizen’s liberty as something wholly dependent on their benevolence and magnanimity.