Since nuclear energy is a risky business for commercial operators , it's crucial to get government assistance through regulated cost recovery & price guarantees.
Pak transgenders push for political representation, prepare election manifesto. Pakistani entrepreneur’s solar revolution to combat nation’s power woes. Punjab assembly passes historic bill that gives Sikh marriages legal status. Karachi nuclear power plant praised for ‘security infra’
India’s premier defence public sector undertaking, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, will have a new Chairman and Managing Director in May 2026. The selection process has...
While global corporations setting up GCCs in India continue to express confidence in availability of skilled AI engineers, the panel argued that India’s real challenge lies elsewhere.
Taylor ‘Fema’ Hiester, commander of USAF F-16 Viper Demo Team, hit out at air show organisers for continuing with the show after Wing Commander Namansh Syal lost his life in the incident.
It is a brilliant, reasonably priced, and mostly homemade aircraft with a stellar safety record; only two crashes in 24 years since its first flight. But its crash is a moment of introspection.
Pakistan’s conventional strength shows that Pakistan is trying to put its all efforts to halt any aggression from Indian side. On the other hand India’s efforts to counter Pakistan’s defense are only for attaining hegemonic status in the region and it will create instability in the region.
Pakistan will maintain deterrence against any Indian threat, whether, conventional or strategic by any means necessary. Indian aggressive military buildup is posing a territorial threat to Pakistan, because more than seventy percent of Indian troops are deploying on Pakistani border, while India is further reducing troops deployment on Chinese border. Pakistan must develop any weapon necessary to defeat the Indian ill designs.
This article has a purpose attached. Pakistan is not conventionally strong when it comes to the comparison with its arch rival. Pakistan spends meager amount on its defense where India spends handsome amount, which allows it to be worlds largest arms importer. Leave alone its nuclear budget for single ISRO. Pakistan has a well professional army that relies on meager defense allocation but its not overwhelming to make its conventional deterrence as effective as India’s
Pakistan has repeatedly proposed the initiation of a strategic restraint regime in the subcontinent but India has dismissed such peace overtures. It is ironical that a State that aspires to revise the global order is not amenable to make peace in its immediate neighbourhood. Charity usually begins at home. Pakistan has no regional or global power ambitions. It has always aspired to live peacefully, if unencumbered with such challenges on its borders.
Pakistan’s defense planners always considered their conventional might as first line of defense against any conventional military attack. In 2001-02 conflict, Pakistan was certain that its military is fully capable of thwarting Indian military advancement. Pakistan strategic deterrence is mostly based on robust conventional military capability and readiness. Any coercive diplomacy by India will always be encountered by deploying Pakistani troops across the international border as exercised in “Azm-e-Nau.”
Dear editor or writer
He was never KILLED. He is a martyr.
If you know the difference please correct.
Pakistan’s conventional strength shows that Pakistan is trying to put its all efforts to halt any aggression from Indian side. On the other hand India’s efforts to counter Pakistan’s defense are only for attaining hegemonic status in the region and it will create instability in the region.
Pakistan will maintain deterrence against any Indian threat, whether, conventional or strategic by any means necessary. Indian aggressive military buildup is posing a territorial threat to Pakistan, because more than seventy percent of Indian troops are deploying on Pakistani border, while India is further reducing troops deployment on Chinese border. Pakistan must develop any weapon necessary to defeat the Indian ill designs.
This article has a purpose attached. Pakistan is not conventionally strong when it comes to the comparison with its arch rival. Pakistan spends meager amount on its defense where India spends handsome amount, which allows it to be worlds largest arms importer. Leave alone its nuclear budget for single ISRO. Pakistan has a well professional army that relies on meager defense allocation but its not overwhelming to make its conventional deterrence as effective as India’s
Pakistan has repeatedly proposed the initiation of a strategic restraint regime in the subcontinent but India has dismissed such peace overtures. It is ironical that a State that aspires to revise the global order is not amenable to make peace in its immediate neighbourhood. Charity usually begins at home. Pakistan has no regional or global power ambitions. It has always aspired to live peacefully, if unencumbered with such challenges on its borders.
Pakistan’s defense planners always considered their conventional might as first line of defense against any conventional military attack. In 2001-02 conflict, Pakistan was certain that its military is fully capable of thwarting Indian military advancement. Pakistan strategic deterrence is mostly based on robust conventional military capability and readiness. Any coercive diplomacy by India will always be encountered by deploying Pakistani troops across the international border as exercised in “Azm-e-Nau.”