A Supreme Court judgment in 1994 in the Ayodhya case had ruled that while a Muslim can pray practically anywhere, the site of a Hindu temple is set in stone.
Armani built a multibillion-dollar global brand from something as simple as an unstructured jacket, and broke down the walls between formal and casual.
From Munir’s point of view, a few bumps here and there is par for the course. He isn’t going to drive his dumper truck to its doom. He wants to use it as a weapon.
Both lack civic sense.
It is correct that Hindu Yatra is limited for a few days , but namaz programme is daily five times every day.
Use of loud speakers should be banned in both cases and public rights be given top priority. Strict discipline be maintained in both the cases.
Personally I haven’t ever seen roads being blocked for namaaz, so can’t comment on it. Have seen traffic and civic life affected due to processions (both Hindu & Muslim) though. People who are concerned about civic life being affected due to religious events should demand better roads and traffic & civic administration. They could actually volunteer and help the administration in managing such events. People/organizations who are involved in/organize such events should also help the administration in managing by providing volunteers such that civic life is not disrupted due to their event. Special care must be taken so that emergency services are not at all hindered.
Are these authors/people who wrote in the article seriously dumb (or just acting) not to know the difference that : HINDU festivities/Yatras etc are for a day or short duration while the MUSLIM NAMAZ/AZAN is a DAILY TORTURE… That too EARLY MORNING…… How can you even compare the TWO ???
A country called Pakistan/ Bangladesh was created for islam to be practiced openly 5 times a day everyday. Please spare a thought for hindus who have to make space for secular faith of liberals every day
Why this question is only arising when there is BJP in UP, we never raised questions on people using loudspeaker 6 times a day before it was the BJP government. Both are equally wrong, but now only we realized it only because there is. BJP government, but before that there was no one asking the 6 times loudspeaker question.
Both lack civic sense.
It is correct that Hindu Yatra is limited for a few days , but namaz programme is daily five times every day.
Use of loud speakers should be banned in both cases and public rights be given top priority. Strict discipline be maintained in both the cases.
Personally I haven’t ever seen roads being blocked for namaaz, so can’t comment on it. Have seen traffic and civic life affected due to processions (both Hindu & Muslim) though. People who are concerned about civic life being affected due to religious events should demand better roads and traffic & civic administration. They could actually volunteer and help the administration in managing such events. People/organizations who are involved in/organize such events should also help the administration in managing by providing volunteers such that civic life is not disrupted due to their event. Special care must be taken so that emergency services are not at all hindered.
Are these authors/people who wrote in the article seriously dumb (or just acting) not to know the difference that : HINDU festivities/Yatras etc are for a day or short duration while the MUSLIM NAMAZ/AZAN is a DAILY TORTURE… That too EARLY MORNING…… How can you even compare the TWO ???
A country called Pakistan/ Bangladesh was created for islam to be practiced openly 5 times a day everyday. Please spare a thought for hindus who have to make space for secular faith of liberals every day
Why this question is only arising when there is BJP in UP, we never raised questions on people using loudspeaker 6 times a day before it was the BJP government. Both are equally wrong, but now only we realized it only because there is. BJP government, but before that there was no one asking the 6 times loudspeaker question.