Confronting only secular insurgents in Pakistan, while overlooking jihadist groups operating from Iran, will do little to change the broader strategic equilibrium. History underlines this point.
A public meeting, where the women voiced their protest, took place this month in Delhi, grounded on the findings of an AIDWA survey, covering 9,000 women borrowers.
Joint Doctrine for Special Forces Operations, released Wednesday, also outlines plans for the future expansion of AFSOD and the creation of Joint Service Training Institutes.
Putin sees this as a victory. Europeans have decided to deal with Trump on his terms for the sake of the larger Western alliance. We look at the lessons for us in India.
How absurd these women are. Are they implying there is no sexual harassment of women in workplaces? They must be like the three monkeys who don’t see, hear or speak of evil. Pathetic!
If we respect freedom of expression and plurality of views, it would be unfair to castigate someone for taking a contrarian position. However, if someone who stands accused of impropriety is a former colleague, friend or husband, writing against the movement is liable to be seen as pushing an agenda. What seems to be paining younger journalists about their seniors mentioned in this column is that these women are failing to see the historic importance of the Me Too movement, for all workspaces and newsrooms in particular. Worse may be happening in rural India. However, to refer to that in an effort to trivialise what is presently a largely urban, middle class movement is classic whataboutery. Some tasteless remarks can be made, reflecting a lack of education and upbringing, but violating the bodily integrity of a woman, especially someone in a subordinate position, is a criminal act. No alibis.
I agree with each of the original statements of the women being attacked in this article.
Despicable “women” aka enablers.
How absurd these women are. Are they implying there is no sexual harassment of women in workplaces? They must be like the three monkeys who don’t see, hear or speak of evil. Pathetic!
If we respect freedom of expression and plurality of views, it would be unfair to castigate someone for taking a contrarian position. However, if someone who stands accused of impropriety is a former colleague, friend or husband, writing against the movement is liable to be seen as pushing an agenda. What seems to be paining younger journalists about their seniors mentioned in this column is that these women are failing to see the historic importance of the Me Too movement, for all workspaces and newsrooms in particular. Worse may be happening in rural India. However, to refer to that in an effort to trivialise what is presently a largely urban, middle class movement is classic whataboutery. Some tasteless remarks can be made, reflecting a lack of education and upbringing, but violating the bodily integrity of a woman, especially someone in a subordinate position, is a criminal act. No alibis.