The development comes a day after the woman, who accused Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi of sexual misconduct, expressed reservations about Justice Ramana.
Pakistan failed to understand the fiercely independent psyche of the Afghans and Pashtun nationalism, which has dominated politics in Afghanistan since its emergence in 1747.
Tajikistan did not want to extend the lease because of apparent pressure from Russia & China over non-regional military personnel at the air base, it is learnt.
On 21 Oct, a buzz went up that the govt had released full list of gallantry award recipients along with Op Sindoor citations. I put an AI caddy on the job. It took me into a never-ending rabbit hole.
The last sentence of this article is:
“She claimed that her husband and brother-in-law, both of whom were head constables, were suspended for a 2012 criminal case that had been mutually resolved.”
Could this have any bearing on her complaint against the CJI? Can we construe that, perhaps, she requested the CJI to “please help” in restoring the services of the two policemen related to her, and the CJI refused, and she decided to launch a fake case against him “to teach him a lesson”?
The above may not be the direct provocation, but I will put 2 FACTS before everyone : 1) in every, I repeat EVERY office where men and women work together, there are umpteen instances of lighthearted banter which can be called sexist or flirtatious. Women themselves wholeheartedly participate in such lightheaded banter. At a later date, if it suits her, a woman can call such banter a nasty insult inflicted on her by one of her male colleagues.
2) the complainant has demonstrated, as evident from the FIR against her dated 3 March, that she has once before threatened a man “to implicate him in a false case”. Not every woman has such a temperament. So many quarrels take place between men and women, but not every woman thinks up THIS ALTERNATIVE at her disposal to settle the argument. The investigation should try to find out if this woman who has complained against the CJI has such temperament – – that she is haughty and revengeful by nature. This in my humble opinion is the most important key to this case. Her friends, colleagues, and relatives should be interviewed to see if this woman has such a spiteful nature IN GENERAL
The last sentence of this article is:
“She claimed that her husband and brother-in-law, both of whom were head constables, were suspended for a 2012 criminal case that had been mutually resolved.”
Could this have any bearing on her complaint against the CJI? Can we construe that, perhaps, she requested the CJI to “please help” in restoring the services of the two policemen related to her, and the CJI refused, and she decided to launch a fake case against him “to teach him a lesson”?
The above may not be the direct provocation, but I will put 2 FACTS before everyone : 1) in every, I repeat EVERY office where men and women work together, there are umpteen instances of lighthearted banter which can be called sexist or flirtatious. Women themselves wholeheartedly participate in such lightheaded banter. At a later date, if it suits her, a woman can call such banter a nasty insult inflicted on her by one of her male colleagues.
2) the complainant has demonstrated, as evident from the FIR against her dated 3 March, that she has once before threatened a man “to implicate him in a false case”. Not every woman has such a temperament. So many quarrels take place between men and women, but not every woman thinks up THIS ALTERNATIVE at her disposal to settle the argument. The investigation should try to find out if this woman who has complained against the CJI has such temperament – – that she is haughty and revengeful by nature. This in my humble opinion is the most important key to this case. Her friends, colleagues, and relatives should be interviewed to see if this woman has such a spiteful nature IN GENERAL
Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud would make a fine replacement.