A judge in Madras High Court once passed a comment on my short haircut. I protested but other male lawyers made me apologise. This is what women lawyers face.
The petition, heard by a bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi, claimed that Indira Jaising & Anand Grover’s Lawyers Collective misused foreign funding under FCRA.
Supreme Court cites a 2003 case to say it’s not liable to disclose report in CJI Ranjan Gogoi sexual harassment probe. ThePrint looks at details of the judgment.
Canada faces serious foreign interference issues, but these challenges must not be weaponized to unfairly target friendly and important allies like India.
In Episode 1544 of CutTheClutter, Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta looks at some top economists pointing to the pitfalls of ‘currency nationalism’ with data from 1991 to 2004.
Among 19 Indian firms sanctioned by US Treasury Dept was Lokesh Machines Ltd accused of coordinating with 'Russian defence procurement agent to import Italy-origin CNC machines'.
While we talk much about our military, we don’t put our national wallet where our mouth is. Nobody is saying we should double our defence spending, but current declining trend must be reversed.
I think there is a factual mistake in this article. The government had elevated 3 judges in February/March, 2019, one of whom is a Dalit and is on track to become CJI after the next CJI, probably in 2022. I read this in an article on THE PRINT itself.
The author is described as working in the Supreme court and a Dalit. I wonder why she does not know about it since it has been 4 months since the appointment.
Or is she intentionally leaving out these details to make her point. In this case, she would as guilty as any of the others she is criticising.
Please update the article with the correct information and avoid spreading misinformation.
I think there is a factual mistake in this article. The government had elevated 3 judges in February/March, 2019, one of whom is a Dalit and is on track to become CJI after the next CJI, probably in 2022. I read this in an article on THE PRINT itself.
The author is described as working in the Supreme court and a Dalit. I wonder why she does not know about it since it has been 4 months since the appointment.
Or is she intentionally leaving out these details to make her point. In this case, she would as guilty as any of the others she is criticising.
Please update the article with the correct information and avoid spreading misinformation.
The goal is to spread misinformation why would they update anything