Judges are squabbling, popular confidence is frayed, and the executive is poised to bury the hatchet: in its back. Can an exhausted judiciary fight back?
At a recent event, Justice Chelameswar said that serving judges can talk to the media about issues relevant to the judiciary without violating guideline number 9 of the Judicial Code of Ethics. Experts weigh in on the likely impact on the Indian judiciary.
This edition of 'Off The Cuff' saw Indian Jurist, President of The Bar Association, Fali Nariman in conversation with ThePrint Chairman & Editor-in-Chief Shekhar...
Pressure on judiciary to be transparent has resulted in a travesty – a pilot project in two district courts where proceedings will be recorded without audio.
Indian sampradayas have to institutionalise their knowledge and boil it down to essentials for transmission and proselytisation if they are to compete with the major Abrahamic sects.
On 4 November 2025, NCLAT bench, comprising Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan and Member Arun Baroka, noted that WhatsApp and Meta are distinct legal entities.
This world is being restructured and redrawn by one man, and what’s his power? It’s not his formidable military. It’s trade. With China, it turned on him.
To better understand why Modi and his aides are deliberately misleading people about this problem, don’t stop with Nehru but go back in time, may be a 1000 years. A very deep wound wound in the Hindu psyche is the conquest of North India by ‘foreigners’. So by blaming the politicians, the myth that the army of the kings were defeated because of the fault of the kings, i.e. the Hindus are a brave people.
You can’t understand present India without referring to these wounds. And this can partially explain the ferocious attack of the BJP/RSS on the JNU-types and the Muslims.
Are you pushing an agenda Mr Coupta when you say
This impression will now be cemented if the CJI persists with the PIL demanding action against critics of the Loya judgement.
To better understand why Modi and his aides are deliberately misleading people about this problem, don’t stop with Nehru but go back in time, may be a 1000 years. A very deep wound wound in the Hindu psyche is the conquest of North India by ‘foreigners’. So by blaming the politicians, the myth that the army of the kings were defeated because of the fault of the kings, i.e. the Hindus are a brave people.
You can’t understand present India without referring to these wounds. And this can partially explain the ferocious attack of the BJP/RSS on the JNU-types and the Muslims.
Are demagogues allowed unlimited ‘no balls,’ in an election campaign?