Law minister Prasad writes to CJI Misra suggesting judiciary didn’t handle the probe well, but SC functionary calls it an attempt to obfuscate the issue.
Khaps gained prominence as a tribal and village administration mechanism, and are most prevalent in the states of Maharashtra, Rajasthan, MP, UP, and Haryana.
Experts weigh in on the opposition leaders petition to impeach Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra. If it happens, it will be the first time a motion to remove a sitting CJI is moved in Parliament.
Justice A.P. Shah also says 4 judges who have questioned Chief Justice of India didn’t breach any code of conduct and had instead upheld constitutional values.
The mercy killing debate began with the Aruna Shanbaug case, the Mumbai nurse spent 42 years in a vegetative state after a brutal assault by a sweeper.
New bill aims to fix key issues with IBC 2016, including delays & patchy implementation, and protect creditors, with window for genuine promoters to retain control of their companies.
Billed as the military’s own version of Raisina Dialogue, the event will spotlight on tech-driven warfighting, lessons from Operation Sindoor and release of three new doctrines.
Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?
There is hardly many people in the country who, being questioned about exercise of authority, would abdicate his power to decide critical issues involving himself in allegations, by others.
In all probability the other judges, considered Constitutionally equal, in all probability, would have devised a procedure equally impersonal and admirable to inspire universal confidence. But the situation reiterating continuance of the same system question by resectable judges, perhaps further provokes lack of confidence in the exsisting procedure in place.
Sad and ominous for the 1.30 bn people!
It is evident that the Registry could not have overriden the CJI’s authority, assigned such a sensitive case to another Bench, acceeding to the petitioners’s plea that it should not be heard by the CJI. However, in light of recent developments, turning down the plea, reiterating the absolute discretion that the term ” Master of the Roster ” implies is unfortunate. It will keep discontent simmering that is not occasioned by personalities or any personal intetest but a deep, principled concern for the credibility of India’s most respected, trusted institution. Succeeding CJIs, the first of whom ought unquestionably to be Justice Gogoi, will have to heal the rift.
There is hardly many people in the country who, being questioned about exercise of authority, would abdicate his power to decide critical issues involving himself in allegations, by others.
In all probability the other judges, considered Constitutionally equal, in all probability, would have devised a procedure equally impersonal and admirable to inspire universal confidence. But the situation reiterating continuance of the same system question by resectable judges, perhaps further provokes lack of confidence in the exsisting procedure in place.
Sad and ominous for the 1.30 bn people!
It is evident that the Registry could not have overriden the CJI’s authority, assigned such a sensitive case to another Bench, acceeding to the petitioners’s plea that it should not be heard by the CJI. However, in light of recent developments, turning down the plea, reiterating the absolute discretion that the term ” Master of the Roster ” implies is unfortunate. It will keep discontent simmering that is not occasioned by personalities or any personal intetest but a deep, principled concern for the credibility of India’s most respected, trusted institution. Succeeding CJIs, the first of whom ought unquestionably to be Justice Gogoi, will have to heal the rift.