Prosecuting diplomat Devyani Khobragade opened Preet Bharara to charges of betraying his Indian roots, the former US Attorney writes in 'Doing Justice'.
Instead of provisions for death penalty, it is restorative justice that needs to be built into the existing laws and implemented through a sensitised justice delivery system.
The IndiGo crisis is nothing short of a threat to India’s stability. Could it be an experiment? Can this happen in any other crucial sector like power or railways?
November exports to the US saw 10% growth from the previous month. Overall, in the first 8 months this fiscal, the merchandise exports to the US touched has touched $59bn.
It is argued that India-Israel ties are moving from buyer–seller dynamic to one focused on joint development & manufacturing partnership, a shift 'more durable' than traditional arms sales.
Don’t blame misfortune. This is colossal incompetence and insensitivity. So bad, heads would have rolled even in the old PSU-era Indian Airlines and Air India.
I am happy that Preet Bharara is fired because he refuses to charge a police officer who is the White for shooting an unarmed teenager who is Black. Shame on Preet; I do not have a bad feeling for Preet. He deserves the punishment for refusing to charge a police officer. Preet, if you do not like my comments, too bad; you are an adult and you should be ashamed of yourself. Yes, I am very angry at you!!!
It remains truly disappointing that those who vehemently opposed Mr. Preet Bharara did not bother to carefully research the facts of each of the cases in which people of South Asian origins happened to be defendants.
The likes of Mr. Raj Rajaratnam and Ms. Devyani Khobragade could never have been categorised as “helpless innocents”, regardless of what their supporters may have wanted to believe. That term would have been more appropriate to describe people such as the Indian domestic worker (the alleged victim) who deserved justice which had, apparently, been denied to her while “working” for Ms. Khobragade. Interestingly, nobody in India had seemed the least bothered about her!
Both Mr. Rajaratnam and Ms. Khobragade were prosecuted under the prevailing laws of the country which any individual holding the title of United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York at the time would have had to follow. So then why the vitriol specifically directed against Mr. Bharara? Was he supposed to have provided a “free pass” to any defendants just because they might have happened to share similar ethnicity to Mr. Bharara’s?
It appears that Mr. Bharara paid a high price for just doing his job well. Or, perhaps, it was the fame that came with his success that caused many of his detractors to succumb to that well-known human frailty of envy.
Article won’t be complete until you discuss and mention the background of Bharara’s parents who were brought up, educated and employed on a state-sponsored subsidized system which asks for not for an ROI on investment but at least a basic human decency and loyalty till then he would and should be considered a ungrateful smart little c*nt. Unknown to his own background and history.
So the son has to abandon the ethics and principles of the Law of United States, the country which educated him and gave him benefit of doubt to reach one of the highest positions to serve. So the Indian subsidized system would REQUIRE any patrons to serve any legitimate or illegitimate issues of the India and have ENSLAVED the future generations into that binding! Did you think this is 2nd CE that Humans are still bonded labors for generations. Aah and then you expect basic loyalty not to the country that gave him education BUT loyalty to India for their ILLEGITIMATE doings.
I am happy that Preet Bharara is fired because he refuses to charge a police officer who is the White for shooting an unarmed teenager who is Black. Shame on Preet; I do not have a bad feeling for Preet. He deserves the punishment for refusing to charge a police officer. Preet, if you do not like my comments, too bad; you are an adult and you should be ashamed of yourself. Yes, I am very angry at you!!!
My only problem with you is that you let the Jew go and captured the Indian scapegoat, Mathew Martomo.
It remains truly disappointing that those who vehemently opposed Mr. Preet Bharara did not bother to carefully research the facts of each of the cases in which people of South Asian origins happened to be defendants.
The likes of Mr. Raj Rajaratnam and Ms. Devyani Khobragade could never have been categorised as “helpless innocents”, regardless of what their supporters may have wanted to believe. That term would have been more appropriate to describe people such as the Indian domestic worker (the alleged victim) who deserved justice which had, apparently, been denied to her while “working” for Ms. Khobragade. Interestingly, nobody in India had seemed the least bothered about her!
Both Mr. Rajaratnam and Ms. Khobragade were prosecuted under the prevailing laws of the country which any individual holding the title of United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York at the time would have had to follow. So then why the vitriol specifically directed against Mr. Bharara? Was he supposed to have provided a “free pass” to any defendants just because they might have happened to share similar ethnicity to Mr. Bharara’s?
It appears that Mr. Bharara paid a high price for just doing his job well. Or, perhaps, it was the fame that came with his success that caused many of his detractors to succumb to that well-known human frailty of envy.
Article won’t be complete until you discuss and mention the background of Bharara’s parents who were brought up, educated and employed on a state-sponsored subsidized system which asks for not for an ROI on investment but at least a basic human decency and loyalty till then he would and should be considered a ungrateful smart little c*nt. Unknown to his own background and history.
So the son has to abandon the ethics and principles of the Law of United States, the country which educated him and gave him benefit of doubt to reach one of the highest positions to serve. So the Indian subsidized system would REQUIRE any patrons to serve any legitimate or illegitimate issues of the India and have ENSLAVED the future generations into that binding! Did you think this is 2nd CE that Humans are still bonded labors for generations. Aah and then you expect basic loyalty not to the country that gave him education BUT loyalty to India for their ILLEGITIMATE doings.