Since the text of the Constitution goes against the Hindu Right’s worldview, minister Ravi Shankar Prasad has to scavenge the manuscript to show us pictures to suggest its Hindu-ness.
Amid protests by Dalits, BJP govt is also staring at 10 Feb deadline by Marathas to meet their demands for reservations and scrapping of the Atrocities Act.
The ECI needs to respond to Rahul Gandhi’s accusations professionally and transparently. Else, it will end up giving him the ammunition he is desperately seeking.
India’s industrial output growth saw a 10-month low in June, with Index of Industrial Production (IIP) growing by mere 1.5% as against 1.9% in May 2025.
Gen Dwivedi framed Op Sindoor not just as retaliation to Pahalgam, but as demonstration of India’s capability to fight multi-domain conflicts with integration between services & agencies.
Standing up to America is usually not a personal risk for a leader in India. Any suggestions of foreign pressure unites India behind who they see as leading them in that fight.
It’s ironic that the ‘Hindu’ Gods who have been depicted are just that – Gods – and are the stuff of scriptures and epics. The ‘others’ (Buddha, Mahavir, Kabir, Akbar & Co) were real life people who left an indelible imprint on Indian history. In some manner, the inclusion of Hindu Gods amongst non-Hindu mortals (or vice-versa) may suggest many contradictions and concessions that hint at true secularism envisaged by the makers of the Constitution.
Well the party in power today is so insecure about its existence and the Existence of it’s parivar, always trying to twist the narrative in their favour and to remind the people of this country of their existence, saying ho I we are there, we are there, so insecure that they want to use the Hindu word everywhere, so far as to say TAJ is a Hindu monument, Ganhiji did not admonish or reject us, so on and on, why feel so insecure, people have given you 5 years to rule, speak of your performance, or non performance, election is arround buddy.
Anyways, on a more serious note, what RSP was trying to convey was the acceptance of our founding fathers of religious figures into our constitutional masterpiece as a symbol of India’s rich history and culture.
Images represent stories and characters, which in turn represent values & societal norms which the constitution documents and aims to defend.
The soul of the constitution died when Indira Gandhi introduce d secular and socialism in preamble of constitution
The Minister should also to mention that Constitution of India is extension of Manulaw book. LoL
It’s ironic that the ‘Hindu’ Gods who have been depicted are just that – Gods – and are the stuff of scriptures and epics. The ‘others’ (Buddha, Mahavir, Kabir, Akbar & Co) were real life people who left an indelible imprint on Indian history. In some manner, the inclusion of Hindu Gods amongst non-Hindu mortals (or vice-versa) may suggest many contradictions and concessions that hint at true secularism envisaged by the makers of the Constitution.
Well the party in power today is so insecure about its existence and the Existence of it’s parivar, always trying to twist the narrative in their favour and to remind the people of this country of their existence, saying ho I we are there, we are there, so insecure that they want to use the Hindu word everywhere, so far as to say TAJ is a Hindu monument, Ganhiji did not admonish or reject us, so on and on, why feel so insecure, people have given you 5 years to rule, speak of your performance, or non performance, election is arround buddy.
How ironical, your name has Krishna in it. Lol
Anyways, on a more serious note, what RSP was trying to convey was the acceptance of our founding fathers of religious figures into our constitutional masterpiece as a symbol of India’s rich history and culture.
Images represent stories and characters, which in turn represent values & societal norms which the constitution documents and aims to defend.