Since the text of the Constitution goes against the Hindu Right’s worldview, minister Ravi Shankar Prasad has to scavenge the manuscript to show us pictures to suggest its Hindu-ness.
Amid protests by Dalits, BJP govt is also staring at 10 Feb deadline by Marathas to meet their demands for reservations and scrapping of the Atrocities Act.
Following the transaction which is expected to be completed by November, Dassault Reliance Aerospace Ltd will become an associate company, with Reliance retaining a 49% stake.
From Munir’s point of view, a few bumps here and there is par for the course. He isn’t going to drive his dumper truck to its doom. He wants to use it as a weapon.
It’s ironic that the ‘Hindu’ Gods who have been depicted are just that – Gods – and are the stuff of scriptures and epics. The ‘others’ (Buddha, Mahavir, Kabir, Akbar & Co) were real life people who left an indelible imprint on Indian history. In some manner, the inclusion of Hindu Gods amongst non-Hindu mortals (or vice-versa) may suggest many contradictions and concessions that hint at true secularism envisaged by the makers of the Constitution.
Well the party in power today is so insecure about its existence and the Existence of it’s parivar, always trying to twist the narrative in their favour and to remind the people of this country of their existence, saying ho I we are there, we are there, so insecure that they want to use the Hindu word everywhere, so far as to say TAJ is a Hindu monument, Ganhiji did not admonish or reject us, so on and on, why feel so insecure, people have given you 5 years to rule, speak of your performance, or non performance, election is arround buddy.
Anyways, on a more serious note, what RSP was trying to convey was the acceptance of our founding fathers of religious figures into our constitutional masterpiece as a symbol of India’s rich history and culture.
Images represent stories and characters, which in turn represent values & societal norms which the constitution documents and aims to defend.
The soul of the constitution died when Indira Gandhi introduce d secular and socialism in preamble of constitution
The Minister should also to mention that Constitution of India is extension of Manulaw book. LoL
It’s ironic that the ‘Hindu’ Gods who have been depicted are just that – Gods – and are the stuff of scriptures and epics. The ‘others’ (Buddha, Mahavir, Kabir, Akbar & Co) were real life people who left an indelible imprint on Indian history. In some manner, the inclusion of Hindu Gods amongst non-Hindu mortals (or vice-versa) may suggest many contradictions and concessions that hint at true secularism envisaged by the makers of the Constitution.
Well the party in power today is so insecure about its existence and the Existence of it’s parivar, always trying to twist the narrative in their favour and to remind the people of this country of their existence, saying ho I we are there, we are there, so insecure that they want to use the Hindu word everywhere, so far as to say TAJ is a Hindu monument, Ganhiji did not admonish or reject us, so on and on, why feel so insecure, people have given you 5 years to rule, speak of your performance, or non performance, election is arround buddy.
How ironical, your name has Krishna in it. Lol
Anyways, on a more serious note, what RSP was trying to convey was the acceptance of our founding fathers of religious figures into our constitutional masterpiece as a symbol of India’s rich history and culture.
Images represent stories and characters, which in turn represent values & societal norms which the constitution documents and aims to defend.