The 60-yr-old musician's family alleges inadequate medical care. No inquiry yet into circumstances of his death. Human rights groups have been calling for transparency in custodial deaths.
One big challenge that BNP faces today is the rise of its former ally, the Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami. In the February 2026 polls, both parties are pitted against each other.
Bangladesh interim govt had banned activities of Awami League, led by ousted PM Sheikh Hasina, in May this year. Five US Reps express concerns in joint letter to Chief Adviser Yunus.
In interview with ThePrint, info minister in Hasina’s govt accuses Yunus of ‘dog-whistle politics’. ‘When Hindus were attacked, he tried to justify it by claiming them Awami League supporters.’
Hasnat Abdullah of National Citizen Party says if India shelters forces who don't respect Bangladesh's sovereignty, potential, voting rights & human rights, 'Bangladesh will respond'.
The graduation is meant to bolster the legacy and legitimacy of Sheikh Hasina's Awami League, even as the real-world preparedness lagged behind the glossy narrative.
The leaders of the new establishment, including Mohammad Yunus, should realize by now the danger of their single-minded focus on eradicating Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League.
India's projects related to BIMSTEC, Look-East-Act-East and Indian Ocean Rim Association could suffer a setback, impacting trade with South Asia and the South-South Cooperation agenda.
In 2022, athletes claimed they were asked to wind up training early at Thyagraj Stadium so that the IAS couple could walk their dog. Then came the memes and public outrage.
Instead of buying more Mirages outright in early 2000s, the requirement was tweaked in favour of a medium-weight, multi-role fighter with Mirage-like performance.
Pakistan not only has zero chance of catching up with India in most areas, but will inevitably see the gap rising. Its leaders will offer its people the same snake oil in different bottles.
Contrary to what writer has written, Bangladesh has no great strategic value. It is surrounded from all sides by India with small land border disturbed as civil war ongoing in Myanmar. With heightened radicalism / fundamentalism, a densely populated and Natura resource wisw poor country like Bangladesh is well on the way to become like Syria/ Iraq minus oil. Good luck to so called students and their mentor and their advising.
How can someone publish a blind opinion with out justifying the reality of it. Don’t know why you are being a part of this Nazi like propaganda machine.
It is no wonder that folks like Trump are getting elected. The ostrich effect is in failing to see efforts to whitewash history. If the author fails to see how Bangladesh is going down the drain, he will soon be living in a medieval Islamic country that cannot tolerate any alternate views. It is all well to speak against power in a democratic country like India. The fact that all newspapers in Bangladesh were threatened not to carry Sheikh Hasina’s speech and the fact that none of them had the backbone to publish speaks volumes of the new Bangladesh…Look at yourself in the mirror…
The current state of India’s regional relations suggests that its foreign policy approach may play a central role in these recurring tensions. A critical question arises: why do a majority of India’s neighbouring nations—whether Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, or others—seem to encounter persistent diplomatic, territorial, or strategic disputes with New Delhi? While external factors and historical complexities undoubtedly influence these relationships, the pattern invites scrutiny of India’s own strategic posturing and diplomatic priorities.
For instance, accusations of hegemony, unresolved border conflicts, and competing regional influence have often overshadowed collaboration. This recurring friction raises concerns about whether India’s foreign policy framework adequately balances assertiveness with empathy, or national interests with the sovereignty of neighbouring states. Rather than attributing blame unilaterally, it would be prudent for Indian policymakers to engage in earnest self-reflection. A candid reassessment of diplomatic strategies, coupled with open dialogue to address grievances, could pave the way for more stable, equitable partnerships. After all, sustainable regional stability hinges not only on power dynamics but also on mutual respect and trust-building measures.
Author harks back to the days with Vajpayee when DGFI and ISI conspired and supported ULFA whose bombing ripped through Assam. Not only killing hundreds and thousands of people but also igniting fault lines. He thinks India should keep quiet while her neighbours keep on sticking her people and dismantle her security.
Vajpayee learned the hard way that the do quami species of 47 would not change no matter if you save them literally from a genocide. And this is not the only instance. Moraji Desai extended support to a post Mujib government which was answered by helping Tripuri insurgents, Islamists etc by General Zia. It is absolutely frustrating to see GOI not classifying the country as inimical to Indian interest.
As for 71, revisionism is in the air. If we have to rewrite let us agree on something, the Dhaka based elite never supported the independence movement and until the very final days of the war, their stalwarts were part of the collaborator Shanti Bahini. At first they did not care about the slaughter because most of them were Hindus and then when their own people started getting killed also, they shrugged of them as they were mostly villagers. Intellectuals were assaassinated and they probably thought that they had it coming. The joke is this people are the ones who ran the country.
As for Dalai Lama, you are right Hasina is not Dalai Lama. But GOI is not under any obligation to force her to not speak out given the rhetoric and gutter level discourse against India in Bangladesh. Not to mention the deliberate attempt to bring in Pakistani deep state. In essence to ignite hostility with India.
And who is Md Yunus ? If the author takes this myopic liberty to presume who the Dalai Lamas of the world are, may I digress and ask who the Dalai Lama in current Bangladesh is with whom India can be all friendly while the opposite end clearly goes about its charade of blatant disregard and instigation in the name of independent foreign policy and revolution ?
A word of advice for the Print editors – you know something is being desperately tried to push when an article published a few hours ago rakez up thousands of likes in the Facebook/ Meta plugin. Who is trying desperately to push an agenda ? And why ?
Contrary to what writer has written, Bangladesh has no great strategic value. It is surrounded from all sides by India with small land border disturbed as civil war ongoing in Myanmar. With heightened radicalism / fundamentalism, a densely populated and Natura resource wisw poor country like Bangladesh is well on the way to become like Syria/ Iraq minus oil. Good luck to so called students and their mentor and their advising.
How can someone publish a blind opinion with out justifying the reality of it. Don’t know why you are being a part of this Nazi like propaganda machine.
It is no wonder that folks like Trump are getting elected. The ostrich effect is in failing to see efforts to whitewash history. If the author fails to see how Bangladesh is going down the drain, he will soon be living in a medieval Islamic country that cannot tolerate any alternate views. It is all well to speak against power in a democratic country like India. The fact that all newspapers in Bangladesh were threatened not to carry Sheikh Hasina’s speech and the fact that none of them had the backbone to publish speaks volumes of the new Bangladesh…Look at yourself in the mirror…
The current state of India’s regional relations suggests that its foreign policy approach may play a central role in these recurring tensions. A critical question arises: why do a majority of India’s neighbouring nations—whether Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, or others—seem to encounter persistent diplomatic, territorial, or strategic disputes with New Delhi? While external factors and historical complexities undoubtedly influence these relationships, the pattern invites scrutiny of India’s own strategic posturing and diplomatic priorities.
For instance, accusations of hegemony, unresolved border conflicts, and competing regional influence have often overshadowed collaboration. This recurring friction raises concerns about whether India’s foreign policy framework adequately balances assertiveness with empathy, or national interests with the sovereignty of neighbouring states. Rather than attributing blame unilaterally, it would be prudent for Indian policymakers to engage in earnest self-reflection. A candid reassessment of diplomatic strategies, coupled with open dialogue to address grievances, could pave the way for more stable, equitable partnerships. After all, sustainable regional stability hinges not only on power dynamics but also on mutual respect and trust-building measures.
Good to read a contrarian view on this subject.
Author harks back to the days with Vajpayee when DGFI and ISI conspired and supported ULFA whose bombing ripped through Assam. Not only killing hundreds and thousands of people but also igniting fault lines. He thinks India should keep quiet while her neighbours keep on sticking her people and dismantle her security.
Vajpayee learned the hard way that the do quami species of 47 would not change no matter if you save them literally from a genocide. And this is not the only instance. Moraji Desai extended support to a post Mujib government which was answered by helping Tripuri insurgents, Islamists etc by General Zia. It is absolutely frustrating to see GOI not classifying the country as inimical to Indian interest.
As for 71, revisionism is in the air. If we have to rewrite let us agree on something, the Dhaka based elite never supported the independence movement and until the very final days of the war, their stalwarts were part of the collaborator Shanti Bahini. At first they did not care about the slaughter because most of them were Hindus and then when their own people started getting killed also, they shrugged of them as they were mostly villagers. Intellectuals were assaassinated and they probably thought that they had it coming. The joke is this people are the ones who ran the country.
As for Dalai Lama, you are right Hasina is not Dalai Lama. But GOI is not under any obligation to force her to not speak out given the rhetoric and gutter level discourse against India in Bangladesh. Not to mention the deliberate attempt to bring in Pakistani deep state. In essence to ignite hostility with India.
greatly written
And who is Md Yunus ? If the author takes this myopic liberty to presume who the Dalai Lamas of the world are, may I digress and ask who the Dalai Lama in current Bangladesh is with whom India can be all friendly while the opposite end clearly goes about its charade of blatant disregard and instigation in the name of independent foreign policy and revolution ?
A word of advice for the Print editors – you know something is being desperately tried to push when an article published a few hours ago rakez up thousands of likes in the Facebook/ Meta plugin. Who is trying desperately to push an agenda ? And why ?