The three-judge bench hearing the ‘administrative powers of CJI’ case is headed by Dipak Misra himself. Its ruling will be binding on him and all future CJIs.
Two questions are pertinent: Why does the Trump administration keep making the same mistakes on the peace proposal? And what does a hurried peace plan mean on the ground?
While global corporations setting up GCCs in India continue to express confidence in availability of skilled AI engineers, the panel argued that India’s real challenge lies elsewhere.
Without a Congress revival, there can be no challenge to the BJP pan-nationally. Modi’s party is growing, and almost entirely at the cost of the Congress.
One wonders if this petition was filed (and being heard and judgement delivered quickly) at the propitious time to preempt and nullify the Bhusan’s application that has raised very fundamental questions of legal practices/conventions and moral and ethical issues. Also the CJI himself (whose actions triggered and prompted the 4 senior most judges to go public with their anguish) heading this bench to hear the matter rather than recusing is a clear pointer to burying Bhusan’s petition. Hope sense and wise counsel prevail for the sake of Indian democracy. Else it’ll only lead to greater disquiet and turbulence in future.
One wonders if this petition was filed (and being heard and judgement delivered quickly) at the propitious time to preempt and nullify the Bhusan’s application that has raised very fundamental questions of legal practices/conventions and moral and ethical issues. Also the CJI himself (whose actions triggered and prompted the 4 senior most judges to go public with their anguish) heading this bench to hear the matter rather than recusing is a clear pointer to burying Bhusan’s petition. Hope sense and wise counsel prevail for the sake of Indian democracy. Else it’ll only lead to greater disquiet and turbulence in future.
It would have been better if it had been heard by the five learned judges who constitute the collegium.