MY543
- KeralaChalakudy
-
Innocent
Age: 70 Education: Middle School
- 01 Number of Terms
- 69% 80% Attendance/ National Average
- 42 65.3 Debate Participated/ National Average
- 0 2.2 Private member Bills Introduced/ National Average
- 217 285 Question Asked/ National Average
Source: PRS Legislative Research. Data for full-term ministers not recorded.
Subject-wise LS Questions by the MP
Explanation of graph
- Classification of questions only a broad indication.
- “Miscellaneous” signals that fewer MPs raised these topics in general
MPLADS Expenditure
Explanation of graph
- Source: mplads.gov.in. All figures as of 25 Jan 2019
- State Avg is average expenditure of all state constituencies
- Entitlement > 25 crores (carry over from previous LS term)
- Entitlement < 25 crores (by-election/seat vacant)
- Entitlement = 0 (no data available)
Constituency Indicators
Explanation of graph
- The constituency level estimates for nutrition, health, and development are based on research conducted by population health scientists and social scientists at Harvard, IEG, and the Tata Trusts. The complete data, in addition to map visualizations, are available at https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/population-development/indiapcfactsheets
Wrong choice as MP. He is a waste of time
Such a poor job done. He is a waste of time and a burden upon the public. Never give him a second chance. He is making a mockery of the democracy. Shame on keralites…
I stand by with this opinion
Poor performance ever……
Poor performance..success in comedy
He is easily approachable and considers you irrespective of your status and politics. His development initiatives in the constituency are highly appreciated. Anticancer initiatives in the hospitals within the constituency are commendable. Facing any problems with humour and explaining his experiences in parliament innocently and humourously should not be taken as a sign of weakness but a matter of inner strength. His most greatest strength as a person is his ability to view everything in a humorous eye and the courage to even self humorize his life and experiences in order to prove a life point.
Why he is being there for the second time. Why Party is not rethinking about the candidate’s performance for past 5 yrs and nominate new person.
People should think twise to vote such a person
Very poor perfomance
he need to retire from politics, and stay back home
We don’t have any idea that he was there for last 5 years in our constituency. During floods where was he? Even he said that, “In parliament I am just a visitor, and I am not able to understand many things happening over there”. He considers things happening in the parliament as joke. Why we need a MP like this. I don’t know the logic behind CPM’s agenda of giving a ticket for him to compete in Chalakudy.
I agree completely. Never seen dring flood or before in our area. This MP is available in newspaper with film syar only. Wrong choice.
Poor Performance as a MP…… Next time we recommended only a active and good mp from Chalakkudy.
poor performance
He is an utter waste , a bafoon.
Govt. is wasting money on such persons. He is fit for the stage shows and be allowed to perform only in the film industry.
He is a waste.should not be re elected.Dont waste the vote.
He is a very comedian, I wish him stay in movies instead of staying in such respectful position which he does not deserve, I have seen him speaking on number of occasion in public, but as soon as I know that it is this useless MP I used to put my fingers in my ears and walk away. Publin made a biggest blunder by wrongly casting vote for him.
He is a very good comedian. Wish he stays in the movie field and leave the MP seat to people who have political back ground.
He should be given some mimicry portfolios in the parliament mentioned so that his talent can be utilised. Why to blame him, it is the party who sponsor him to think.
He should not have been opted for a second term. Communist party is not interested in the welfare of the people and Nation..
Very poor performance,
Cheating the public, national waste.
Mr Innocent’s performance in the Parliament is far from satisfactory. He should not have been given a 2nd opportunity to stand for election by the Communist Party. It is very clear this party is not bothered about the performance of the MP & they don’t care for the people. At least general public of the constituency should recognize this & ensure that person does not a second chance to enter Parliament.
Poor performance
Why PM data not showing ?
Innocent’s development schemes of 1750 cores
Innocent had un incured expenditure of all mp funds and also the lapsed funds of former member. Some of the development schemes. Technology centre Angamaly 130 cores first phase and second phase 70 cores. Ayudham hospital 15 cores of which 9 cores sanctioned.CRF roads 123 cores,PMGSY roads 32 cores, Mamogram in five government taluk hospitals and dialysis units in taluk hospitals. 32 school buses. Highest lights in colonies. Drinking water schemes in girija colonies. A M.P whose presence felt for the first in this Loksabha constituency after Panampilly
Utter waste…
It is better for. Innacent to continue acting which he can do better and leave politics to better crookes
A total waste of public funds and position
Poor performance. He is good for comedy only.
How leading political parties allowing for such wastage of public funds?. Must not give a second chance
National waste
Very poor performance, should not be given a chance again, cheating the public
Quite a Comprehensive Check List!