Published by Penguin India, ‘India on the Move’ will be released on 17 December on SoftCover, ThePrint’s online platform for launching non-fiction books.
Published by HarperCollins India, ‘Just One Heart’ will be released on 11 December on SoftCover, ThePrint’s online platform for launching non-fiction books.
Published by Penguin India, 'The Ten Trillion Dream Dented' will be released on 29 November on SoftCover, ThePrint’s online platform for launching non-fiction books.
Published by HarperCollins India, ‘2024: The Election That Surprised India' will be released on 28 November on SoftCover, ThePrint’s online platform for launching non-fiction books.
Published by HarperCollins India, ‘The Other Mohan in Britain's India Ocean Empire’ will be released on 15 November on SoftCover, ThePrint’s online platform for launching non-fiction books.
Published by HarperCollins India, 'Speaking with Nature’ will be released on 16 October on SoftCover, ThePrint’s online platform for launching non-fiction books.
Published by Westland Books, The Lion, the Admiral and a Cat Called B. Uma Vijaylakshmi will be released on 9 October on SoftCover, ThePrint’s online platform for launching non-fiction books.
Published by Penguin India, 'The Company of Violent Men’ will be released on 2nd October on SoftCover, ThePrint’s online venue to launch non-fiction books.
Published by HarperCollins India, 'Ahimsa' by Devdutt Pattanaik will be released on 30 September on SoftCover, ThePrint’s online venue to launch non-fiction books.
While global corporations setting up GCCs in India continue to express confidence in availability of skilled AI engineers, the panel argued that India’s real challenge lies elsewhere.
Wing Commander Namansh Syal is survived by his wife, their 6-year-old daughter and his mother. Back in his native village, relatives and neighbours wait for his remains for last rites.
It is a brilliant, reasonably priced, and mostly homemade aircraft with a stellar safety record; only two crashes in 24 years since its first flight. But its crash is a moment of introspection.
Why is the focus solely on “Jai Shree Ram” and “Bande Mataram”?
Why is “Nara e takbeer ..”, “Assalam alaikum”, “Tera mera rishta kya …..”, etc. not under focus?
Was it not the Muslim League which insisted on the Partition? Did slogans like “Lar ke lenge Pakistan” have no malice?
The Print’s review of the book shows how far to the Left it has shifted in recent times. Accusing one side of “blind obedience” while eulogising the other for being “champions of inclusive and diverse India”.
Is supporting Afzal Guru and Maqbool Bhat a pre-condition for being categorised as an inclusive person?
Since when did celebrating convicted terrorists hanged on judicial orders become the cornerstone of a “diverse” India?
This article is shameful. I hope Mr. Shekhar Gupta takes note of this article and initiates a course correction. Otherwise, The Print is well on it’s way to being the next Newslaundry.
The Print has shifted decisively to the Left in its reportage. A sample from this article serves as an example – “On one side stand those who equate patriotism with unquestioning conformity and blind obedience. On the other, a perspective that champions a more inclusive and diverse India, where dissent and criticism are not just tolerated but essential to a functioning democracy.”
The sentences reek of bias and prejudice. It’s absolutely clear that the journalist/editor who wrote these lines considers every right-of-centre person as an “Andhbhakt” – a pejorative term used to describe supporters of Modi/BJP/RSS.
While the “other side” – presumably the Left-liberal cabal – is a champion of “inclusive and diverse India, where dissent and criticism are not just tolerated but essential”. So the Left-liberal supporters are a bunch of progressive saints who are “inclusive” and stand for freedom of speech, rule of law and justice.
Such reportage in The Print is the reason why I am no longer a paid subscriber.
Why is the focus solely on “Jai Shree Ram” and “Bande Mataram”?
Why is “Nara e takbeer ..”, “Assalam alaikum”, “Tera mera rishta kya …..”, etc. not under focus?
Was it not the Muslim League which insisted on the Partition? Did slogans like “Lar ke lenge Pakistan” have no malice?
The Print’s review of the book shows how far to the Left it has shifted in recent times. Accusing one side of “blind obedience” while eulogising the other for being “champions of inclusive and diverse India”.
Is supporting Afzal Guru and Maqbool Bhat a pre-condition for being categorised as an inclusive person?
Since when did celebrating convicted terrorists hanged on judicial orders become the cornerstone of a “diverse” India?
This article is shameful. I hope Mr. Shekhar Gupta takes note of this article and initiates a course correction. Otherwise, The Print is well on it’s way to being the next Newslaundry.
The Print has shifted decisively to the Left in its reportage. A sample from this article serves as an example – “On one side stand those who equate patriotism with unquestioning conformity and blind obedience. On the other, a perspective that champions a more inclusive and diverse India, where dissent and criticism are not just tolerated but essential to a functioning democracy.”
The sentences reek of bias and prejudice. It’s absolutely clear that the journalist/editor who wrote these lines considers every right-of-centre person as an “Andhbhakt” – a pejorative term used to describe supporters of Modi/BJP/RSS.
While the “other side” – presumably the Left-liberal cabal – is a champion of “inclusive and diverse India, where dissent and criticism are not just tolerated but essential”. So the Left-liberal supporters are a bunch of progressive saints who are “inclusive” and stand for freedom of speech, rule of law and justice.
Such reportage in The Print is the reason why I am no longer a paid subscriber.