Judges can work only within the laws that the politicians, with the support (and often cheerful clapping) of ignorant junta, make and give them. As per my understanding, under the law in which umar is held and the PMLA act, if strictly applied, it is next to impossible to get bail unless the gov decides to let the convict get bail. So, the right question to ask is why the public support such laws (and even ask for more tough laws, even when they have zero idea abt the existing laws), and why the SC does not strike down such laws as they go against the fundamental rights. by exploring and adopting suitable techniques.
Judges can work only within the laws that the politicians, with the support (and often cheerful clapping) of ignorant junta, make and give them. As per my understanding, under the law in which umar is held and the PMLA act, if strictly applied, it is next to impossible to get bail unless the gov decides to let the convict get bail. So, the right question to ask is why the public support such laws (and even ask for more tough laws, even when they have zero idea abt the existing laws), and why the SC does not strike down such laws as they go against the fundamental rights. by exploring and adopting suitable techniques.
We are well on our way to become a banana republic.