Mughals forced conversion, destroyed temples. An example is the Somnath temple which was looted 18 times by Muslim invaders. They killed millions. Don’t get me wrong I hate no Muslim; they did not have control over the crimes of their ancestors. most of them were victims of Mughal forced conversions. But I cannot say the same for the people that admire the Mughals.
The introduction of pulao is no excuse for mass genocide.
If only the Portuguese had seen the “Emperor” in royal defacation then the story would have been complete.
By the way the central Asian region from where the Mughals came had no rice, no spice and no silver.
So please stop trying to give a picture that Mal-e-Ghanimat plunderers were royals.
Mughals forced conversion, destroyed temples. An example is the Somnath temple which was looted 18 times by Muslim invaders. They killed millions. Don’t get me wrong I hate no Muslim; they did not have control over the crimes of their ancestors. most of them were victims of Mughal forced conversions. But I cannot say the same for the people that admire the Mughals.
The introduction of pulao is no excuse for mass genocide.
If only the Portuguese had seen the “Emperor” in royal defacation then the story would have been complete.
By the way the central Asian region from where the Mughals came had no rice, no spice and no silver.
So please stop trying to give a picture that Mal-e-Ghanimat plunderers were royals.
Great comment, slap on these Islamic Jihadi apologists.
Nice one
The headline is misleading. The copy talks in a very generic way on the emperor’s food. The headline suggests a narration of one particular instance.