Pathetic article have been reading The Print articles for a long time never came across such a pathetic article.blatant baised attack on the ruling govt.judt because giving ticket to Kangana
Completely biased towards BJP by the so called feminist. Mentioning Manipur but not sandeshkhali..outright abuses by congress party towards BJP women Leaders including Smriti Irani not mentioned shows he writers only thing is to target the BJP .she is articulating her hate towards women with different thought of school nothing other than that.Completely baised article just to proof “look i am feminist and a libru””
No woman deserves to be abused:
– four years ago, she termed Urmila Matondkar a “soft porn star”
– Earlier this year, she called Rihanna, who she has beefed with since the farmers’ agitation, a “porn singer”
– calling her a “gold digger”
I feel like some humans deserve it. And she wouldn’t be the first woman to deserve it.
Anyway, unlike her own jibes, she wasn’t abused for being a woman. She’s abused for being a sellout.
This is such a beautifully balanced and nuanced article.
The author manages to find ways to empathise while never once forgiving the sins of this — by many accounts — despicable ‘celebrity’.
This piece shows not just great writing talent and experience, but a mature wisdom that’s hard to come by these days.
Bravo to the author, and looking forward to more of her writing!
Pathetic article have been reading The Print articles for a long time never came across such a pathetic article.blatant baised attack on the ruling govt.judt because giving ticket to Kangana
Completely biased towards BJP by the so called feminist. Mentioning Manipur but not sandeshkhali..outright abuses by congress party towards BJP women Leaders including Smriti Irani not mentioned shows he writers only thing is to target the BJP .she is articulating her hate towards women with different thought of school nothing other than that.Completely baised article just to proof “look i am feminist and a libru””
No woman deserves to be abused:
– four years ago, she termed Urmila Matondkar a “soft porn star”
– Earlier this year, she called Rihanna, who she has beefed with since the farmers’ agitation, a “porn singer”
– calling her a “gold digger”
I feel like some humans deserve it. And she wouldn’t be the first woman to deserve it.
Anyway, unlike her own jibes, she wasn’t abused for being a woman. She’s abused for being a sellout.
This is such a beautifully balanced and nuanced article.
The author manages to find ways to empathise while never once forgiving the sins of this — by many accounts — despicable ‘celebrity’.
This piece shows not just great writing talent and experience, but a mature wisdom that’s hard to come by these days.
Bravo to the author, and looking forward to more of her writing!