Jinnahbhai wants to became a prime minister of India but Congress and RSS militant group don’t want a Muslim to control the majority Hindu population of India. So, both the jihadist league and the Congress beef made a hasty decision to divide their own flesh and blood, the own ethnicity in the name of their Dumb a** bloody religion.
“As late as April 1947, Gandhi was ready to hand over power to Jinnah at the centre with an all-Muslim administration if he gave up his demand of Partition”…
I really shudder if this would have become reality..These people would have massacred hindus and INC would have done nothing…
‘Jinnah’s two-nation theory, which sharply and irreconcilably dichotomized Hindus and Muslims as two separate nations, is disseminated in Pakistan through the educational curriculum.’
Savarkar had proposed a Two Nation Theory long before Jinnah. At that time, Jinnah was a Congressman and Gandhi called him the finest lawyer in India, and Sarojini Naidu called him the finest patriot.
But Congress while having true secular democrats with a modern outlook also had typical reactionary communal Hindu types like Patel, Lala Lajpat Rai, Tilak. Congress allowed entryism to the Hindu right. These people counteracted Gandhi, Nehru and their reassurances to Muslims.
Karan Thapar says that even Gandhi was not truly secular. He brought in prayer meetings, the only thing is he have space to all religions. Jinnah on the other hand avoided this.
In the background, outside Congress, both the RSS and Hindu Mahasabha openly threatened Muslims, advocating Hitlerian notions. That is just as they are doing now.
In that situation, partition was bound to occur. To avoid partition, it would have required Hindus to show leadership and amicability and not hostility and imposition of a revanchist Hindu Raj. Looking at the RSS-BJP of today with their cow lynchings and pogroms, a Pakistani will say that Jinnah had foresight and could see what would happen when the Hindus with calibre like Nehru and Gandhi disappeared, and the low minded Hindus took over.
“,, typical reactionary communal Hindu types like Patel, Lala Lajpat Rai, Tilak..counteracted Gandhi, Nehru” ? Thought that Lajpat Rai and Tilak were already in the Congress before Gandhi returned to India in 1915, and Gandhi became influential in the party after these people had passed away.
Looks like the commenter is mixing up dates to conveniently suit an anti-Hindu rant and to play the victim card.
We are really thankful that p**kistan was created…dont want such people here in indi..most of the f**th gone to your country
Mr. Subhash Chandra Bose was a highly controversial figure in the Indian National Congress. He left India for Germany in 1940 and was later transport to Japan in a German submarine. Given that the name ‘Pakistan’ was not mentioned in the Lahore Resolution and was not adopted by the Muslim League and Jinnah until April 1943 (see below), exactly what was it that Mr, Bose bargaining for with Jinnah and under what authorisation?
It was not until April 1943 that Muslim League and Jinnah adopted Pakistan as such in Jinnah’s words, ‘ —– when we passed the Lahore Resolution, we had not used the word “Pakistan”. —– Pakistan is a word which is really foisted upon us and fathered on us by some sections of the Hindu Press and also by the British Press. Now our Resolution was known for a long time as the “Lahore Resolution, popularly known as Pakistan”. But how long are we to have this long phrase? I now say to my Hindu and British friends: we thank you for giving us (this) one word’ (Foundation of Pakistan: All-India Muslim League Documents, 1906 – 1947, Vol. II, pp. 425, 6).
If u can accept karan Thapar’s view then Ambedkar ji should be more secular and pragmatic in your eyes….
It was Ambedkar who wrote in his book “Pakistan or partition of India” with ‘data’ and facts why it should be formed…
When you read the book, Gandhi ji was more pseudo secular than you mentioned the names…
Hindu-muslim riots started taking bloody after the death of tilak…
Read Moplah rebellion having an open mind…
For your knowledge Indian congress workers were threatening the muslims to join the Gandhi’s 1932 movement against their wishes…
One more thing…muslims did not take seriously the independence cause till Khilafat…
So, plz do not put a biased view….
K. Hussain Zia: your statement shows your lack of knowledge about Subhash Chandra Bose…
He was not “highly controversial” which you or person like you have not read or do not want to…
He was an unbiased, non-communal, patriot of India who despite differences with pseudo-secular Gandhi (as titled by Ambedkar in his book by examples) remained in the Congress despite Gandhi’s dictatorial decision against him to replace him from the president ship of the Congress….
His objection was, British were not doing any good for india so to remove them he has to take hard steps….
Plz, correct your facts about Alama Iqbal who took this ‘pakistan’ term from an Oxford graduate before 1940 session…
Really????? Have the guy done a bit of chronology analysis?? Subhas Bose left India in 1941 January and never returned back to India till his alleged disappearance in 1945. Now please connect the above said event (except you create another story out of the air)..
1947 events clearly shows , how naive and stupid Hindus were , they trusted Nehru& Gandhi , who said partition will happen only over his dead body , but Gandhi never did fast on to death to prevent partition, it is Hindus mind which was enslaved, why Hindus allowed partition of India , they should have chosen a civil war and ask Muslims to migrate To Afghanistan or Iran if they want to live under Sharia , like US civil war , but greedy congress fooled Hindus , Muslims wiped out Hindus & Sikhs From Pakistan and took their lands and wealth but stayed in India to create future Pakistan, silly Hindus still trying to appease Muslims by calling Muslims brothers and showering them With lollipops!!!
Jinnahbhai wants to became a prime minister of India but Congress and RSS militant group don’t want a Muslim to control the majority Hindu population of India. So, both the jihadist league and the Congress beef made a hasty decision to divide their own flesh and blood, the own ethnicity in the name of their Dumb a** bloody religion.
“As late as April 1947, Gandhi was ready to hand over power to Jinnah at the centre with an all-Muslim administration if he gave up his demand of Partition”…
I really shudder if this would have become reality..These people would have massacred hindus and INC would have done nothing…
‘Jinnah’s two-nation theory, which sharply and irreconcilably dichotomized Hindus and Muslims as two separate nations, is disseminated in Pakistan through the educational curriculum.’
Savarkar had proposed a Two Nation Theory long before Jinnah. At that time, Jinnah was a Congressman and Gandhi called him the finest lawyer in India, and Sarojini Naidu called him the finest patriot.
But Congress while having true secular democrats with a modern outlook also had typical reactionary communal Hindu types like Patel, Lala Lajpat Rai, Tilak. Congress allowed entryism to the Hindu right. These people counteracted Gandhi, Nehru and their reassurances to Muslims.
Karan Thapar says that even Gandhi was not truly secular. He brought in prayer meetings, the only thing is he have space to all religions. Jinnah on the other hand avoided this.
In the background, outside Congress, both the RSS and Hindu Mahasabha openly threatened Muslims, advocating Hitlerian notions. That is just as they are doing now.
In that situation, partition was bound to occur. To avoid partition, it would have required Hindus to show leadership and amicability and not hostility and imposition of a revanchist Hindu Raj. Looking at the RSS-BJP of today with their cow lynchings and pogroms, a Pakistani will say that Jinnah had foresight and could see what would happen when the Hindus with calibre like Nehru and Gandhi disappeared, and the low minded Hindus took over.
“,, typical reactionary communal Hindu types like Patel, Lala Lajpat Rai, Tilak..counteracted Gandhi, Nehru” ? Thought that Lajpat Rai and Tilak were already in the Congress before Gandhi returned to India in 1915, and Gandhi became influential in the party after these people had passed away.
Looks like the commenter is mixing up dates to conveniently suit an anti-Hindu rant and to play the victim card.
We are really thankful that p**kistan was created…dont want such people here in indi..most of the f**th gone to your country
Mr. Subhash Chandra Bose was a highly controversial figure in the Indian National Congress. He left India for Germany in 1940 and was later transport to Japan in a German submarine. Given that the name ‘Pakistan’ was not mentioned in the Lahore Resolution and was not adopted by the Muslim League and Jinnah until April 1943 (see below), exactly what was it that Mr, Bose bargaining for with Jinnah and under what authorisation?
It was not until April 1943 that Muslim League and Jinnah adopted Pakistan as such in Jinnah’s words, ‘ —– when we passed the Lahore Resolution, we had not used the word “Pakistan”. —– Pakistan is a word which is really foisted upon us and fathered on us by some sections of the Hindu Press and also by the British Press. Now our Resolution was known for a long time as the “Lahore Resolution, popularly known as Pakistan”. But how long are we to have this long phrase? I now say to my Hindu and British friends: we thank you for giving us (this) one word’ (Foundation of Pakistan: All-India Muslim League Documents, 1906 – 1947, Vol. II, pp. 425, 6).
If u can accept karan Thapar’s view then Ambedkar ji should be more secular and pragmatic in your eyes….
It was Ambedkar who wrote in his book “Pakistan or partition of India” with ‘data’ and facts why it should be formed…
When you read the book, Gandhi ji was more pseudo secular than you mentioned the names…
Hindu-muslim riots started taking bloody after the death of tilak…
Read Moplah rebellion having an open mind…
For your knowledge Indian congress workers were threatening the muslims to join the Gandhi’s 1932 movement against their wishes…
One more thing…muslims did not take seriously the independence cause till Khilafat…
So, plz do not put a biased view….
K. Hussain Zia: your statement shows your lack of knowledge about Subhash Chandra Bose…
He was not “highly controversial” which you or person like you have not read or do not want to…
He was an unbiased, non-communal, patriot of India who despite differences with pseudo-secular Gandhi (as titled by Ambedkar in his book by examples) remained in the Congress despite Gandhi’s dictatorial decision against him to replace him from the president ship of the Congress….
His objection was, British were not doing any good for india so to remove them he has to take hard steps….
Plz, correct your facts about Alama Iqbal who took this ‘pakistan’ term from an Oxford graduate before 1940 session…
Really????? Have the guy done a bit of chronology analysis?? Subhas Bose left India in 1941 January and never returned back to India till his alleged disappearance in 1945. Now please connect the above said event (except you create another story out of the air)..
1947 events clearly shows , how naive and stupid Hindus were , they trusted Nehru& Gandhi , who said partition will happen only over his dead body , but Gandhi never did fast on to death to prevent partition, it is Hindus mind which was enslaved, why Hindus allowed partition of India , they should have chosen a civil war and ask Muslims to migrate To Afghanistan or Iran if they want to live under Sharia , like US civil war , but greedy congress fooled Hindus , Muslims wiped out Hindus & Sikhs From Pakistan and took their lands and wealth but stayed in India to create future Pakistan, silly Hindus still trying to appease Muslims by calling Muslims brothers and showering them With lollipops!!!
Well said ,Sir.
Well said