Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
The recent remarks by L&T Chairman SN Subrahmanyan advocating for 90-hour workweeks have reignited the debate around overwork in India. While his statement might have emphasized dedication, it has drawn widespread criticism for promoting burnout and undermining work-life balance. Industry leaders like Rajiv Bajaj and Harsh Mariwala have countered this idea, urging a shift toward more competent work practices and employee well-being.
The question remains: Does working longer hours genuinely lead to success, or does it create more harm than good?
The Stanford Study: Hours vs. Productivity
Research from Stanford University shows that longer hours do not always result in higher productivity. While efficiency might hold steady during the initial extra hours, it declines sharply as fatigue and stress set in. Prolonged overworking can lead to significant decreases in performance that total output during extended weeks can be less than that of a standard 40-hour week.
This aligns with workplace observations: tired employees make more mistakes, slow progress, and reduce overall team efficiency.
Reference: https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/cs181/projects/crunchmode/econ-hours-productivity.html
The Health Risks of Long Hours
Further research published in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine highlights another critical aspect: the physical toll of long work hours. The study found:
- Employees working overtime face a 61% higher risk of workplace injuries.
- Working 12+ hours per day increases injury risks by 37%.
- Working 60+ hours per week raises these risks by 23%.
The findings reinforce the idea that overworking diminishes productivity and jeopardizes employee health and safety. These statistics underline the importance of sustainable work practices that prioritize well-being.
Reference: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1741083/
The Nail in the Wall: An Analogy for Efficiency
Imagine you need to hang a picture frame. Here are three approaches:
- The Stone Method: Using a stone to hit the nail takes hours, leaves you exhausted, and risks damaging the wall.
- The Hammer Approach: A hammer gets the job done faster and with less effort.
- The Power Tool Solution: A nail gun drives the nail in seconds with precision and minimal energy.
The stone represents outdated, inefficient work methods. The hammer symbolizes more innovative practices, and the nail gun exemplifies leveraging technology and innovation.
The lesson? It’s not about how long you work but how effectively you use your time and tools.
Working Smarter, Not Longer 🚀
To foster a productive and balanced work culture, organizations must shift their focus from hours worked to outcomes achieved:
- Focus on Results 🎯: Measure success by results, not time logged.
- Provide Better Tools 🛠️: Empower employees with technology, training, and streamlined processes to reduce effort and increase efficiency.
- Encourage Proactivity 🔍: Help employees anticipate challenges and take ownership of solutions.
As Harsh Mariwala aptly said, “It’s not about how much time you spend but how effectively you use your time.”
Leadership Matters: Burnout or Breakthrough?
Extra effort may sometimes be necessary, but it should remain the exception, not the norm. As Rajiv Bajaj pointed out, “If you want people to work 90 hours a week, start from the top.”
Leaders must model sustainable practices by prioritizing balance, investing in tools, and rewarding efficiency. When employees are empowered to work smarter, they create more value without sacrificing their health or personal lives.
What’s Your Take? 💬
Do longer hours lead to success, or is it time to redefine productivity? Share your thoughts below—let’s build smarter, healthier workplaces together.
This version blends the productivity-focused insights from Stanford with the occupational health risks outlined in the Occupational and Environmental Medicine study, creating a holistic argument for sustainable work practices. Let me know if further tweaks are needed!
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint