Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/
“All plants are our brothers and sisters. They talk to us, and if we listen, we can hear them.” — Arapaho Proverb
This essay is a listening exercise.
It listens to the cracks in our systems, the myths that once held us together, and the ecological memory buried beneath our economic obsessions. It does not seek to elevate one civilization over another, but to restore balance
History, as imagined by Hegel, was the unfolding of human freedom through dialectical struggle — thesis, antithesis, synthesis — culminating in the rational state. Marx inherited this arc but grounded it in material conditions: history as class struggle, driven by ownership and labor. Both thinkers envisioned progress, but neither foresaw the scale of devastation that would accompany it.
Natural science charted history through adaptation and ecological succession. Economics framed it as the march from scarcity to surplus. But beneath these narratives lies a darker truth: human advancement has often come at the expense of weaker groups and fragile ecosystems. Over the last 500 years, the thirst for resources became pathological. Colonial empires exterminated indigenous peoples, enslaved millions, and obliterated biomes. Forests became commodities. Rivers became trade routes. Cultures became collateral.
As Nate Hagens argues, the idea of humans as rational agents steering history is a myth. Our behavior — individually and collectively — reveals symptoms of ceaseless starvation. We are dopamine-driven organisms, wired to seek novelty, status, and control. The urge to transform our environment metastasized into a compulsion to expand — always outward, always more — at the detriment of Earth itself. The closest analogy is a locust swarm: blind to limits, driven by hunger, leaving devastation in its wake.
Hagens also introduces the idea of the Superorganism — the hidden architecture behind modern economic systems. It’s not a single man or cabal, but an emergent entity: a global human enterprise driven by energy, reward loops, and systemic momentum. It behaves as if it has agency, calling the tune, even though it’s composed of billions of individuals acting out their biological imperatives. The “hidden man” is not a person — it’s a feedback loop masquerading as progress.
To diagnose systemic fragility, we must name its failure modes. Three collapse lenses offer clarity:
– Fukuyama Moment: A breakdown born of ideological hubris — when a system declares itself final, invulnerable, or beyond revision. It is the blindness of triumph, the arrogance of permanence.
– Fukushima Moment: A breakdown born of neglected foresight — when known risks are dismissed, deferred, or downplayed. It is the blindness of denial, the cost of ignoring fragility.
– Black Swan Event (Nassim Taleb) : A breakdown born of radical unpredictability — rare, high-impact, and outside the realm of expectation. It is the blindness of assumption.
Unlike Black Swans, which may arrive uninvited, Fukuyama and Fukushima moments are authored collapses. They carry fingerprints. They are engineered fragilities. They are preventable — if we choose to see.
As Francis Fukuyama once wrote:
- “It was the slave’s continuing desire for recognition that was the motor which propelled history forward, not the idle complacency and unchanging self-identity of the master.”
If history moves through struggle, then regeneration begins with recognition — of fragility, of memory, of Earth herself.
South Asia for millennia, has absorbed and reimagined diverse traditions – preserving ancient tribal legends – that arguably lend material to the one of oldest epics in the world, Vedic hymns reaching the sky that gave way to quiet contemplation Dravidian cosmologies, Buddhist ethics, Jain austerity, Islamic , and Christian syncretic traditions . South Asia offers a living microcosm of humanity where diversity is preserved while coexisting as a living cultural soul
This mythic convergence extended across Southeast and Central Asia. The Ramayana was retold in Thai, Khmer, and Javanese forms. The Hikayat Hang Tuah of Malaysia blended Islamic heroism with animist folklore. The La Galigo epic from Indonesia narrated creation through ancestral spirits. In Central Asia, Zoroastrian fire rituals mingled with Buddhist iconography, and Turkic epics preserved nomadic wisdom. These stories weren’t just entertainment — they were moral infrastructure, ecological memory, and cultural glue.
South Asia’s role is not to claim primacy over other worlds — but to restore balance. It offers a gravitational center that tempers ideological excess, ecological amnesia, and historical arrogance. It reminds us that civilization is not a race to the top, but a dance of mutual recognition.
But this mythic inheritance is under strain. In India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, religion is increasingly deployed as a quick fix — a tool to gloss over internal conflicts, unrealized aspirations, and economic peril. Political actors channel repressed anger toward identified groups, weaponizing faith to distract from systemic failures. This dynamic is no longer confined to the sub continent . In the West, too, religion is being reactivated — not as a source of collective meaning, but as a vessel for grievance. Fukuyama, writing in the early 1990s, could not have foreseen this resurgence in the countries he saw as the epitome of liberal democracy
To reclaim cultural sanity, we must return to the stories that bind rather than break. Not as nostalgia, but as strategy. Myth is not a relic — it is a regenerative technology.
And regeneration begins with naming not only collapse — but healing. For every Fukuyama Moment, there is a Sanctuary Reflex — a return to humility, ritual, and refuge. For every Fukushima Moment, a Safeguard Activation — the reinstallation of buffers, redundancies, and foresight. Even Black Swans can trigger Spontaneous Regeneration — emergent cooperation, innovation, and resilience.
We began with dialectics and ended with ecosystems. We named collapse not to mourn it, but to understand it. We traced its cognitive roots. We honored the myths that merged cultures. And we envisioned a new arc — not of history, but of futures. Now Let us find that balance between the storm and the calm to bring life back to our planet and into our lives
The same mind that builds empires can plant forests. The same system that collapses, can heal — if only we listen – as the Arapaho tells us
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.