Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
Donald Trump’s second presidency has been disruptive, to put it mildly. From Eastern Europe to the Middle East, the global order is rippling. Ukraine, despite unprecedented Western aid, appears set to lose more territory to Russia. Palestinian statehood, already fragile, is now near collapse, as Israel prepares for full-scale occupation of Gaza with tacit U.S. approval. Trump has not merely disrupted diplomacy; he has rewritten the rules on trade, security, and coercion.
A World Bowing to Washington
Across continents, nations and blocs have quietly acquiesced to Trump’s economic aggression. The European Union, ever dependent on American security guarantees, folded almost instantly. The U.K., desperate to reinforce its “special relationship,” abandoned any talk of retaliation. Canada unilaterally reversed its counter-tariffs in the name of economic peace. In Asia, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore pledged billions in new U.S. investments – a kind of tribute extracted in return for market access.
The Middle East, reliant on U.S. military cover, has fallen in line as well. Iran, having seen its network of regional proxies dismantled, is increasingly isolated. Latin America has largely retreated, save for a tentative Brazilian exception. South Africa finds itself cornered by sanctions. Even Russia, despite its battlefield advances in Ukraine, has reluctantly complied with U.S. – EU price caps on hydrocarbons. India too, for all its rhetoric of “strategic autonomy,” has sought quiet, face-saving negotiations behind closed doors in Washington.
The message is clear: most capitals would rather bend than risk being broken by America’s coercive power.
Beijing: The Lone Holdout
Yet amid global capitulation, one country stands apart – China. Its resistance may be understated, but its implications are seismic. The U.S. – China trade relationship still exceeds $650 billion annually, underscoring deep mutual dependence. Trump may wield tariffs, some spiking as high as 40%, but he cannot secure America’s economic or strategic position without China’s factories, minerals, or consumers.
Rare earths provide the clearest example. China produces 70% of mined rare earths and nearly 90% of refined output, including the magnets and materials that power modern technology. The U.S. itself sources around 70% of its rare-earth imports from China, a reminder that coercion has limits when dependency is this entrenched. No tariff can erase this asymmetry.
Beijing’s quiet defiance reflects decades of groundwork. By building industrial indispensability, it has insulated itself from unilateral coercion in ways no other major power has.
The Pivotal Moment
History will likely mark this as a turning point in great-power dynamics. Trump’s hyper-aggressive posture has thrown into sharp relief China’s structural resilience. In a world where nearly all others have yielded, Beijing’s ability to resist demonstrates that it is not just a challenger to U.S. primacy, it is an indispensable counterweight.
Lessons for India
For India, the implications are urgent. Strategic autonomy on paper has not yet translated into material strength. Unlike China, India does not hold any truly indispensable position in global industry. Its contribution to world manufacturing remains modest at just 2.8%, compared to China’s commanding 28.8%.
Still, there are glimmers of opportunity. Between 2018 and 2022, India’s exports to the U.S. surged by $23 billion, an increase of 44%, while China’s exports fell by 10%. Within that growth, India’s semiconductor and materials exports to the U.S. jumped 143%, auto components rose 65%, and machinery exports climbed 70%. In pharmaceuticals, India is already a global leader, producing more than 50% of the world’s vaccines and serving as the backbone of affordable medicines worldwide.
These shifts hint at the possibility of India carving out niches of indispensability, if pursued with deliberate strategy. India must emulate the Chinese approach: build domestic industrial resilience before testing the boundaries of diplomatic defiance. Whether in semiconductors, critical minerals, defence manufacture, or life sciences, depth at home must precede boldness abroad. Otherwise, “strategic autonomy” will remain an aspiration, not a shield.
The Bigger Picture
Trump’s presidency has exposed the fragility of what was once called the rules-based order. Trade is no longer about efficiency; it has become a weapon of coercion. Security alliances are no longer about deterrence, they are conditional arrangements, leveraged to extract tribute. In this era, compliance may bring temporary comfort, but only leverage ensures lasting sovereignty.
China, having built that leverage through decades of industrial dominance, now stands resilient. India faces a choice: it can continue lobbying Washington for exceptions and waivers, or it can invest in building structural indispensability that forces others to take its interests seriously.
The lesson of the Trump era is simple but sobering: diplomacy without economic backbone is submission by another name. China has shown what quiet defiance backed by hard power can achieve. The question for India is whether it will follow that example or remain a supplicant at the altar of geopolitics.
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.