Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
For the first time in recent memory, India’s net foreign direct investment (FDI) turned negative in August 2025. Gross inflows slumped to roughly $6 billion, barely half of July’s figure, while repatriations by foreign companies touched nearly $5 billion. Add to that the steady foreign portfolio investor (FPI) sell-offs through the year, and India suddenly finds itself confronting a paradox: a booming domestic growth story colliding with fading global investor enthusiasm.
This is more than a statistical blip. It is a strategic signal, one that demands a rethink of how India positions itself in the global capital landscape, manages macroeconomic vulnerabilities, and balances confidence with credibility.
A Pause in the “India Story”
For years, India’s narrative to global investors has been one of inevitability: demography, democracy, and digital transformation would together ensure sustained inflows. That story now faces its first real stress test.
When net FDI turns negative, it means not just that inflows have slowed, but that existing investors are pulling money out faster than new ones are putting it in. It reflects hesitation, whether about returns, regulation, or risk perception.
Global factors are certainly at play. A strong U.S. dollar and elevated interest rates make American assets more attractive, drawing capital away. At the same time, China’s slowdown, commodity volatility, and geopolitical uncertainty have triggered a broader “risk-off” sentiment worldwide. But India’s case is unique. Despite being among the fastest-growing large economies, foreign investors are adopting a “wait-and-see” approach.
Why? Some answers lie closer home:
- Policy predictability remains a concern, particularly in sectors such as e-commerce, taxation, and data regulation
- Export competitiveness has slipped amid tariff barriers and weak global demand
- And while domestic consumption is resilient, profitability pressure in several industries, from electronics to renewables, has prompted parent companies to repatriate capital instead of reinvesting
The Macro Tightrope
For India’s economic managers, this reversal poses a delicate balancing act between growth ambition and external stability. On one hand, India needs foreign capital to sustain its investment cycle, particularly for infrastructure, manufacturing, and green transition goals. On the other, volatile portfolio flows and falling FDI increase the burden on the rupee, widen the current account deficit, and make external borrowing costlier.
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has so far handled this turbulence well, maintaining liquidity while preventing sharp currency swings. Yet, even the RBI’s latest bulletin quietly acknowledges that FDI inflows have moderated and that the external sector could face “transient pressures” i.e., India can no longer take global capital for granted.
Recalibrating the Investment Proposition
India’s long-term fundamentals remain robust, young labour, expanding markets, and improving logistics. But investors increasingly want predictability over potential. That demands a recalibration from optimism to operational clarity, through:
- Ease of Doing Business 2.0: The next frontier is not regulatory reform, but regulatory consistency. Clearer exit norms, dispute resolution mechanisms, and stable tax frameworks
- Sectoral focus: India’s FDI strategy must pivot from chasing all capital to courting the right kind, deep tech, renewables, semiconductors, and high-value manufacturing where India’s policy ecosystem can differentiate itself from peers like Vietnam or Mexico
- Outward investment discipline: As Indian companies increasingly invest abroad, policymakers must ensure these flows complement domestic capital formation. Encouraging joint ventures that bring back technology and market access would strike that balance
- Domestic ballast: The quiet hero of India’s markets this year has been the domestic institutional investor (DII), provident funds, insurers, and retail SIPs. Strengthening these channels further will help cushion FPI volatility
Vulnerabilities and the Road Ahead
The immediate concern lies in external vulnerabilities. If the rupee weakens further and oil prices climb, the current account deficit could widen beyond the comfort zone. Meanwhile, any dip in forex reserves would restrict RBI’s ability to smooth shocks.
Still, there is no reason for alarm, only for action. Unlike in 2013’s “taper tantrum,” India today has stronger reserves, better inflation control, and a deeper domestic market. What it needs is to communicate a clear policy path that assures global investors of continuity amid change.
Confidence with Credibility
India’s economic diplomacy often touts itself as a bridge between the developed and developing worlds. To retain that credibility, it must signal that capital, whether domestic or foreign, is welcome, secure, and efficiently deployed.
The turning of net FDI into negative territory is not a verdict against India; it is a reminder. The world is re-pricing risk, and even large economies must constantly earn their attractiveness. A reform fatigue or perception gap, if allowed to grow, can quickly outweigh even the best growth numbers.
If the past decade was about inviting capital, the coming one must be about anchoring it, through policy stability, and institutional maturity. That is the only way India can convert its promise into permanence.
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.